Literature DB >> 20959370

Prognostic significance of parameters derived from co-registered 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET and contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with high-grade glioma.

M J Paldino1, T Z Wong, D A Reardon, H S Friedman, D P Barboriak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic significance of the volume and intensity of abnormal (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) accumulation within areas of contrast enhancement on post-therapeutic volumetric MRI.
METHODS: A total of 10 patients with Grade III or IV glioma were treated with resection followed by intracavitary radiation therapy with (131)I-labelled antitenascin monoclonal antibody. Patients underwent serial FDG-PET and 1.5 T MR imaging. For each patient, MR and FDG-PET image volumes at each time point were aligned using a rigid-body normalised mutual information algorithm. Contrast-enhancing regions of interest (ROIs) were defined using a semi-automated k-means clustering technique. Activity within the ROI on the co-registered PET scan was calculated as a ratio (mean activity ratio; MAR) to activity in contralateral normal-appearing white matter (NAWM). The PET lesion was defined as the portion of the ROI associated with activity greater than two standard deviations above the mean in NAWM. Survival was assessed using the logrank test.
RESULTS: Larger contrast-enhancing ROIs were strongly associated with an increased MAR (r = 0.51; p<0.002). Enhancing lesions with an MAR >1.2 were associated with decreased survival (p<0.016). In nine patients who died, the MAR on PET correlated inversely with survival duration (r = -0.43; p<0.01), whereas PET lesion volume did not.
CONCLUSION: Following intracavitary radiation therapy, the development of contrast-enhancing lesions that are associated with high mean FDG-PET accumulation suggests poor prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20959370      PMCID: PMC3473471          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/48528504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  29 in total

1.  Volumetric analysis of 18F-FDG PET in glioblastoma multiforme: prognostic information and possible role in definition of target volumes in radiation dose escalation.

Authors:  Kevin S Tralins; James G Douglas; Keith J Stelzer; David A Mankoff; Daniel L Silbergeld; Robert C Rostomily; Sharon Hummel; Jeff Scharnhorst; Kenneth A Krohn; Alexander M Spence; Robert Rostomilly
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Glioma therapies: how to tell which work?

Authors:  James R Perry; J Gregory Cairncross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-08-11       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Prediction of pathology and survival by FDG PET in gliomas.

Authors:  M V Padma; S Said; M Jacobs; D R Hwang; K Dunigan; M Satter; B Christian; J Ruppert; T Bernstein; G Kraus; J C Mantil
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Simultaneous in vivo positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ciprian Catana; Daniel Procissi; Yibao Wu; Martin S Judenhofer; Jinyi Qi; Bernd J Pichler; Russell E Jacobs; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Comparison of visual and ROI-based brain tumour grading using 18F-FDG PET: ROC analyses.

Authors:  P T Meyer; M Schreckenberger; U Spetzger; G F Meyer; O Sabri; K S Setani; T Zeggel; U Buell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-02

6.  The sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET in distinguishing recurrent brain tumor from radionecrosis in patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  S T Chao; J H Suh; S Raja; S Y Lee; G Barnett
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2001-06-20       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Kinetic characterization of hexokinase isoenzymes from glioma cells: implications for FDG imaging of human brain tumors.

Authors:  M Muzi; S D Freeman; R C Burrows; R W Wiseman; J M Link; K A Krohn; M M Graham; A M Spence
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 8.  Temozolomide and treatment of malignant glioma.

Authors:  H S Friedman; T Kerby; H Calvert
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Image analysis in patients with cancer studied with a combined PET and CT scanner.

Authors:  M Charron; T Beyer; N N Bohnen; P E Kinahan; M Dachille; J Jerin; R Nutt; C C Meltzer; V Villemagne; D W Townsend
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.794

10.  Comparison of (18)F-FET and (18)F-FDG PET in brain tumors.

Authors:  Dirk Pauleit; Gabriele Stoffels; Ansgar Bachofner; Frank W Floeth; Michael Sabel; Hans Herzog; Lutz Tellmann; Paul Jansen; Guido Reifenberger; Kurt Hamacher; Heinz H Coenen; Karl-Josef Langen
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 2.408

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Standard clinical approaches and emerging modalities for glioblastoma imaging.

Authors:  Joshua D Bernstock; Sam E Gary; Neil Klinger; Pablo A Valdes; Walid Ibn Essayed; Hannah E Olsen; Gustavo Chagoya; Galal Elsayed; Daisuke Yamashita; Patrick Schuss; Florian A Gessler; Pier Paolo Peruzzi; Asim K Bag; Gregory K Friedman
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2022-05-26

2.  Multiparametric MRI and [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Is a Potential Prognostic Imaging Biomarker in Recurrent Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Comron Hassanzadeh; Yuan James Rao; Anupama Chundury; Jackson Rowe; Maria Rosana Ponisio; Akash Sharma; Michelle Miller-Thomas; Christina I Tsien; Joseph E Ippolito
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 6.244

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.