Literature DB >> 20959292

The Pancreatic Expression database: 2011 update.

Rosalind J Cutts1, Emanuela Gadaleta, Stephan A Hahn, Tatjana Crnogorac-Jurcevic, Nicholas R Lemoine, Claude Chelala.   

Abstract

The Pancreatic Expression database (PED, http://www.pancreasexpression.org) has established itself as the main repository for pancreatic-derived -omics data. For the past 3 years, its data content and access have increased substantially. Here we describe several of its new and improved features, such as data content, which now includes over 60,000 measurements derived from transcriptomics, proteomics, genomics and miRNA profiles from various pancreas-centred reports on a broad range of specimen and experimental types. We also illustrate the capabilities of its interface, which allows integrative queries that can combine PED data with a growing number of biological resources such as NCBI, Ensembl, UniProt and Reactome. Thus, PED is capable of retrieving and integrating different types of -omics, annotations and clinical data. We also focus on the importance of data sharing and interoperability in the cancer field, and the integration of PED into the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) data portal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20959292      PMCID: PMC3013788          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death world-wide (1) with surgical intervention and radiotherapy having a minimal impact on 5-year survival rates. As a result, patient survival rates have remained relatively unchanged over the past 30 years. Because of the poor prognosis associated with pancreatic cancer, a multitude of studies have been dedicated to elucidating the pathogenesis of this malignancy (2). Augmented by advances in high-throughput technologies, this has resulted in a plethora of -omics data. Despite the magnitude of information available, the heterogeneity and isolation of public datasets prevents researchers from effectively mining, extracting and integrating relevant data into their current research. The publicly available Pancreatic Expression database (PED) was developed to overcome these obstacles by enabling complex pancreatic datasets to be manipulated, mined and integrated with ease (3). Since its inception in 2007, PED has undergone extensive improvements. The range of clinical and -omics data types available for queries has broadened substantially, facilitating the systematic study of pancreatic cancer. Unlike many cancer databases specialised in providing single-type information, PED stores four different kinds of -omics data: transcriptomics, proteomics, miRNA and genomics. These profiles are derived from a broad range of specimens from tissues and body fluids of healthy people or patients, cell lines and mouse models as well as different treatments and drugs. This is key to providing a comprehensive overview of the molecular changes in cancer. Another important feature of PED is that it allows for its data to be interrogated from major gene repositories such as NCBI EntrezGene (4) and Ensembl GeneView (5), third-party software such as R statistical environment (6) and Cytoscape (7) or jointly with data from major biological resources such as the Reactome Pathway project (8), PRIDE (9) and UniProt (10). Increased functionality also allows for greater interoperability with international cancer efforts, such as the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC, http://www.icgc.org), a major international collaboration designed to identify the key genetic mutations involved in up to 50 types of cancer, which will enable the development of new and better ways of diagnosing, treating and preventing cancer (11). To the best of our knowledge, there are neither tools nor databases that provide the same information for cancer research as our platform. By allowing for integration and mining of published pancreatic cancer data in the context of a wide range of annotations, PED offers more options than raw data repositories such as Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (12) or ArrayExpress (13). One of the main strengths of our system is the possibility of setting many filters to ask very specific pancreatic cancer-related questions and obtain a focused annotated data output. Here we outline details of the improved data content, query interfaces and interoperability.

IMPROVED DATA CONTENT

The database contains 56 015 differential or expression measurements and 6363 DNA copy number alterations. These data values are extracted from over 59 published studies and include profiles from a large number of specimen types, such as pancreatic tissues and various body fluids obtained from healthy subjects and patients with benign, pre-malignant and malignant diseases. In addition, studies using pancreatic cancer cell lines and murine models have also been incorporated (Supplementary Table S1). Where applicable, information on the different treatment conditions applied is provided to users. The collected samples were profiled on a wide range of transcriptomics, proteomics, miRNAs and genomics platforms (Supplementary Table S2). To date, PED describes pancreatic-related regulation events in 8229 genes/proteins, 27 327 transcripts and 279 miRNA as well as 2771 gains, 1073 losses, 347 homozygous deletions, 1297 high-level amplifications and 875 loss of heterozygosity events occurring in distinct genomic areas. The data collection pipeline from the original database was enhanced to cover not only transcriptomics but also genomics, proteomics and miRNA information. Data from the primary literature were manually curated, reviewed for accuracy and consistency, and loaded into a relational database. The Ensembl annotations originally used for mapping probe identifiers and gene names to standard values (version 48) have been updated to a more current version (version 56). This ensures that our database remains up-to-date with ongoing improvements to annotation and microarray probe set mappings and helps avoid data integrity errors. The data collection process was expanded to encompass new data types such as DNA copy number changes. Here, chromosomal coordinates for each copy number variation identified from papers were mapped to genome release GRCh37 with conversions between genome versions carried out using the liftover tool from UCSC (14). We imported the available Ensembl human gene annotations (5) for genes, proteins, SNP information, sequences, gene structure and multi-species data, enabling the integration and annotation of heterogeneous pancreatic data (Supplementary Table S3).

IMPROVED QUERY CAPABILITIES

While the original PED system included tools for querying across different tumour stages of pancreatic cancer and different pancreatic disease types in a simple integrated way (3), the interface has been greatly improved to provide the user access to the expanded data content. By including new platforms, comparisons and data types, it is possible to combine information and, therefore, to perform more complex queries than by viewing expression data alone. For example, it is possible to highlight the impact of copy number aberrations on gene expression patterns to filter out genes whose expression levels are not consistent with their DNA copy number status and point to the subset of candidate oncogenes or tumour suppressor genes showing copy number-driven expression changes (Figure 1). There are now options available for proteomics, transcriptomics and miRNA profiling, allowing these data types to be queried in isolation or combined to look for genes consistently identified across different data technologies or to extract specific data such as microRNAs deregulated in the different stages of pancreatic cancer.
Figure 1.

Integrated view of genomic and transcriptomic changes in pancreatic cancer. This figure integrates the results from both genome-wide DNA copy number and genome-wide gene expression profiling. In a few seconds, this allows for visual inspection of copy number-driven expression changes. Here the query is to find genes differentially up-regulated in PDAC versus normal using microdissected ductal cells (A) and then combine this information with data on genes that are also associated with genomic variations in PDAC samples by combining with results for copy number changes on high level amplifications (B). Pick attributes for display (C). A summary of the first 20 results is shown in (D).

Integrated view of genomic and transcriptomic changes in pancreatic cancer. This figure integrates the results from both genome-wide DNA copy number and genome-wide gene expression profiling. In a few seconds, this allows for visual inspection of copy number-driven expression changes. Here the query is to find genes differentially up-regulated in PDAC versus normal using microdissected ductal cells (A) and then combine this information with data on genes that are also associated with genomic variations in PDAC samples by combining with results for copy number changes on high level amplifications (B). Pick attributes for display (C). A summary of the first 20 results is shown in (D). The new interface incorporates the full functionality and data from Ensembl Mart 56 including richer data content and more advanced querying capabilities and also makes better use of the BioMart interface capabilities (15) for cross-linking different datasets that have data types in common; for example by combining PED data with Reactome pathway data of human reactions and pathways (8) (Figure 2). This integration allows researchers to quickly identify both pancreatic cancer genes and the pathways they control.
Figure 2.

Cross-linking pathways information from reactome. Results from the previous query (shown in Figure 1) can be further mined and merged with data from Reactome. Here we select Reactome pathways as a second dataset to combine in queries and then restrict obtained information to ‘Homo sapiens’ data (A). Pick attributes and display a summary of the first 20 results (B). Query results return pathway name and stable ID with a hyper-link to the Reactome website allowing to instantly extract data (C).

Cross-linking pathways information from reactome. Results from the previous query (shown in Figure 1) can be further mined and merged with data from Reactome. Here we select Reactome pathways as a second dataset to combine in queries and then restrict obtained information to ‘Homo sapiens’ data (A). Pick attributes and display a summary of the first 20 results (B). Query results return pathway name and stable ID with a hyper-link to the Reactome website allowing to instantly extract data (C).

IMPROVED DATA ACCESS

PED is freely accessible through a BioMart web-based query interface at http://www.pancreasexpression.org. PED is also a DAS server (16) providing DAS annotations for the wider community, so it can be used in other resources or browsers such as Ensembl GeneView using the GeneDAS protocol. Access is also possible via web services through third party software tools that have been made compatible with BioMart resources such as Bioconductor (http://www.bioconductor.org) (6,17), Galaxy (18) and Cytoscape (7). Interoperability with the ICGC is also possible through this web services layer and PED is now available through the ICGC data portal (http://dcc.icgc.org) (Figure 3) allowing researchers to conduct combined queries on ICGC experimental data alongside PED literature data. This further increases the ways in which the database can be accessed and its exposure to a variety of disciplines and interests in the scientific community. The database is also accessible as a Linkout resource from NCBI EntrezGene (4). This allows EntrezGene users to be alerted to pancreatic expression data by the presence of a data link for relevant genes that are in the database.
Figure 3.

Interoperability with the ICGC experimental data. Access available from http://dcc.icgc.org. The figure shows the ICGC data portal report for the TP53 gene including gene information; ICGC experimental sequencing results obtained from the participating centres; and PED data. In the PED Report section, a heatmap represents, visually, the level of de-regulation as extracted from the original publication and stored in PED. If you hold your mouse over the coloured box, it will display the fold change value (when available).

Interoperability with the ICGC experimental data. Access available from http://dcc.icgc.org. The figure shows the ICGC data portal report for the TP53 gene including gene information; ICGC experimental sequencing results obtained from the participating centres; and PED data. In the PED Report section, a heatmap represents, visually, the level of de-regulation as extracted from the original publication and stored in PED. If you hold your mouse over the coloured box, it will display the fold change value (when available).

DISCUSSION

We have described how PED has evolved from its original role as a repository for cancer transcriptomics data into a comprehensive resource capable of providing a quick overview of molecular changes at the transcriptome, proteome, genome and/or miRNA level. Consequently, there has been a huge growth in its -omics, specimen/clinical and annotation data content. We believe that interoperability is a key factor in the utility and productive use of any current and future cancer databases. This is essential to ensure the sustainability of any cancer database and facilitate its integration with major international efforts in cancer research such as the ICGC. This will also allow the design and implementation of more sophisticated analysis portals. The cancer research community needs open source, fully interoperable resources allowing information connectivity and data sharing. Only these types of resource can ensure that cancer data generated across different organisations are shared, thereby maximising the impact of cancer research. By using the BioMart technology for its data management system, PED is fully interoperable with the ICGC. This ensures that PED is integrated with The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, http://cgap.nci.nih.gov) data available through the ICGC data portal. The BioMart web service layer also allows PED to be integrated with several other data sources that also use the BioMart technology such as Reactome, PRIDE, UniProt and Ensembl. Moreover, PED is a Linkout resource integrated with NCBI. Our database fills the urgent requirement of the pancreatic cancer community for resources capable of integrating the overflowing influx of data generated by novel high-throughput technologies. The architectural flexibility of PED is easily extendable to other disease types, with this model being used to create a similar resource for malignant (breast cancer) and non-malignant (neurodegenerative) diseases. Reuse of a similar database design will facilitate complex query capabilities across multiple diseases and data types.

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Supplementary Data are available at NAR Online.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK (programme grant C355/A6253) and FW6 EU project MolDiag-Paca. R.C. is funded by Breast Cancer Campaign. Funding for open access charge: Cancer Research UK. Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
  17 in total

1.  Integration of biological networks and gene expression data using Cytoscape.

Authors:  Melissa S Cline; Michael Smoot; Ethan Cerami; Allan Kuchinsky; Nerius Landys; Chris Workman; Rowan Christmas; Iliana Avila-Campilo; Michael Creech; Benjamin Gross; Kristina Hanspers; Ruth Isserlin; Ryan Kelley; Sarah Killcoyne; Samad Lotia; Steven Maere; John Morris; Keiichiro Ono; Vuk Pavlovic; Alexander R Pico; Aditya Vailaya; Peng-Liang Wang; Annette Adler; Bruce R Conklin; Leroy Hood; Martin Kuiper; Chris Sander; Ilya Schmulevich; Benno Schwikowski; Guy J Warner; Trey Ideker; Gary D Bader
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  International network of cancer genome projects.

Authors:  Thomas J Hudson; Warwick Anderson; Axel Artez; Anna D Barker; Cindy Bell; Rosa R Bernabé; M K Bhan; Fabien Calvo; Iiro Eerola; Daniela S Gerhard; Alan Guttmacher; Mark Guyer; Fiona M Hemsley; Jennifer L Jennings; David Kerr; Peter Klatt; Patrik Kolar; Jun Kusada; David P Lane; Frank Laplace; Lu Youyong; Gerd Nettekoven; Brad Ozenberger; Jane Peterson; T S Rao; Jacques Remacle; Alan J Schafer; Tatsuhiro Shibata; Michael R Stratton; Joseph G Vockley; Koichi Watanabe; Huanming Yang; Matthew M F Yuen; Bartha M Knoppers; Martin Bobrow; Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Lynn G Dressler; Stephanie O M Dyke; Yann Joly; Kazuto Kato; Karen L Kennedy; Pilar Nicolás; Michael J Parker; Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag; Carlos M Romeo-Casabona; Kenna M Shaw; Susan Wallace; Georgia L Wiesner; Nikolajs Zeps; Peter Lichter; Andrew V Biankin; Christian Chabannon; Lynda Chin; Bruno Clément; Enrique de Alava; Françoise Degos; Martin L Ferguson; Peter Geary; D Neil Hayes; Thomas J Hudson; Amber L Johns; Arek Kasprzyk; Hidewaki Nakagawa; Robert Penny; Miguel A Piris; Rajiv Sarin; Aldo Scarpa; Tatsuhiro Shibata; Marc van de Vijver; P Andrew Futreal; Hiroyuki Aburatani; Mónica Bayés; David D L Botwell; Peter J Campbell; Xavier Estivill; Daniela S Gerhard; Sean M Grimmond; Ivo Gut; Martin Hirst; Carlos López-Otín; Partha Majumder; Marco Marra; John D McPherson; Hidewaki Nakagawa; Zemin Ning; Xose S Puente; Yijun Ruan; Tatsuhiro Shibata; Michael R Stratton; Hendrik G Stunnenberg; Harold Swerdlow; Victor E Velculescu; Richard K Wilson; Hong H Xue; Liu Yang; Paul T Spellman; Gary D Bader; Paul C Boutros; Peter J Campbell; Paul Flicek; Gad Getz; Roderic Guigó; Guangwu Guo; David Haussler; Simon Heath; Tim J Hubbard; Tao Jiang; Steven M Jones; Qibin Li; Nuria López-Bigas; Ruibang Luo; Lakshmi Muthuswamy; B F Francis Ouellette; John V Pearson; Xose S Puente; Victor Quesada; Benjamin J Raphael; Chris Sander; Tatsuhiro Shibata; Terence P Speed; Lincoln D Stein; Joshua M Stuart; Jon W Teague; Yasushi Totoki; Tatsuhiko Tsunoda; Alfonso Valencia; David A Wheeler; Honglong Wu; Shancen Zhao; Guangyu Zhou; Lincoln D Stein; Roderic Guigó; Tim J Hubbard; Yann Joly; Steven M Jones; Arek Kasprzyk; Mark Lathrop; Nuria López-Bigas; B F Francis Ouellette; Paul T Spellman; Jon W Teague; Gilles Thomas; Alfonso Valencia; Teruhiko Yoshida; Karen L Kennedy; Myles Axton; Stephanie O M Dyke; P Andrew Futreal; Daniela S Gerhard; Chris Gunter; Mark Guyer; Thomas J Hudson; John D McPherson; Linda J Miller; Brad Ozenberger; Kenna M Shaw; Arek Kasprzyk; Lincoln D Stein; Junjun Zhang; Syed A Haider; Jianxin Wang; Christina K Yung; Anthony Cros; Anthony Cross; Yong Liang; Saravanamuttu Gnaneshan; Jonathan Guberman; Jack Hsu; Martin Bobrow; Don R C Chalmers; Karl W Hasel; Yann Joly; Terry S H Kaan; Karen L Kennedy; Bartha M Knoppers; William W Lowrance; Tohru Masui; Pilar Nicolás; Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag; Laura Lyman Rodriguez; Catherine Vergely; Teruhiko Yoshida; Sean M Grimmond; Andrew V Biankin; David D L Bowtell; Nicole Cloonan; Anna deFazio; James R Eshleman; Dariush Etemadmoghadam; Brooke B Gardiner; Brooke A Gardiner; James G Kench; Aldo Scarpa; Robert L Sutherland; Margaret A Tempero; Nicola J Waddell; Peter J Wilson; John D McPherson; Steve Gallinger; Ming-Sound Tsao; Patricia A Shaw; Gloria M Petersen; Debabrata Mukhopadhyay; Lynda Chin; Ronald A DePinho; Sarah Thayer; Lakshmi Muthuswamy; Kamran Shazand; Timothy Beck; Michelle Sam; Lee Timms; Vanessa Ballin; Youyong Lu; Jiafu Ji; Xiuqing Zhang; Feng Chen; Xueda Hu; Guangyu Zhou; Qi Yang; Geng Tian; Lianhai Zhang; Xiaofang Xing; Xianghong Li; Zhenggang Zhu; Yingyan Yu; Jun Yu; Huanming Yang; Mark Lathrop; Jörg Tost; Paul Brennan; Ivana Holcatova; David Zaridze; Alvis Brazma; Lars Egevard; Egor Prokhortchouk; Rosamonde Elizabeth Banks; Mathias Uhlén; Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Juris Viksna; Fredrik Ponten; Konstantin Skryabin; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal; Ewan Birney; Ake Borg; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Carlos Caldas; John A Foekens; Sancha Martin; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Andrea L Richardson; Christos Sotiriou; Hendrik G Stunnenberg; Giles Thoms; Marc van de Vijver; Laura van't Veer; Fabien Calvo; Daniel Birnbaum; Hélène Blanche; Pascal Boucher; Sandrine Boyault; Christian Chabannon; Ivo Gut; Jocelyne D Masson-Jacquemier; Mark Lathrop; Iris Pauporté; Xavier Pivot; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Eric Tabone; Charles Theillet; Gilles Thomas; Jörg Tost; Isabelle Treilleux; Fabien Calvo; Paulette Bioulac-Sage; Bruno Clément; Thomas Decaens; Françoise Degos; Dominique Franco; Ivo Gut; Marta Gut; Simon Heath; Mark Lathrop; Didier Samuel; Gilles Thomas; Jessica Zucman-Rossi; Peter Lichter; Roland Eils; Benedikt Brors; Jan O Korbel; Andrey Korshunov; Pablo Landgraf; Hans Lehrach; Stefan Pfister; Bernhard Radlwimmer; Guido Reifenberger; Michael D Taylor; Christof von Kalle; Partha P Majumder; Rajiv Sarin; T S Rao; M K Bhan; Aldo Scarpa; Paolo Pederzoli; Rita A Lawlor; Massimo Delledonne; Alberto Bardelli; Andrew V Biankin; Sean M Grimmond; Thomas Gress; David Klimstra; Giuseppe Zamboni; Tatsuhiro Shibata; Yusuke Nakamura; Hidewaki Nakagawa; Jun Kusada; Tatsuhiko Tsunoda; Satoru Miyano; Hiroyuki Aburatani; Kazuto Kato; Akihiro Fujimoto; Teruhiko Yoshida; Elias Campo; Carlos López-Otín; Xavier Estivill; Roderic Guigó; Silvia de Sanjosé; Miguel A Piris; Emili Montserrat; Marcos González-Díaz; Xose S Puente; Pedro Jares; Alfonso Valencia; Heinz Himmelbauer; Heinz Himmelbaue; Victor Quesada; Silvia Bea; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal; Peter J Campbell; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Andrea L Richardson; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Marc van de Vijver; Gilles Thomas; Jocelyne D Masson-Jacquemier; Samuel Aparicio; Ake Borg; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Carlos Caldas; John A Foekens; Hendrik G Stunnenberg; Laura van't Veer; Douglas F Easton; Paul T Spellman; Sancha Martin; Anna D Barker; Lynda Chin; Francis S Collins; Carolyn C Compton; Martin L Ferguson; Daniela S Gerhard; Gad Getz; Chris Gunter; Alan Guttmacher; Mark Guyer; D Neil Hayes; Eric S Lander; Brad Ozenberger; Robert Penny; Jane Peterson; Chris Sander; Kenna M Shaw; Terence P Speed; Paul T Spellman; Joseph G Vockley; David A Wheeler; Richard K Wilson; Thomas J Hudson; Lynda Chin; Bartha M Knoppers; Eric S Lander; Peter Lichter; Lincoln D Stein; Michael R Stratton; Warwick Anderson; Anna D Barker; Cindy Bell; Martin Bobrow; Wylie Burke; Francis S Collins; Carolyn C Compton; Ronald A DePinho; Douglas F Easton; P Andrew Futreal; Daniela S Gerhard; Anthony R Green; Mark Guyer; Stanley R Hamilton; Tim J Hubbard; Olli P Kallioniemi; Karen L Kennedy; Timothy J Ley; Edison T Liu; Youyong Lu; Partha Majumder; Marco Marra; Brad Ozenberger; Jane Peterson; Alan J Schafer; Paul T Spellman; Hendrik G Stunnenberg; Brandon J Wainwright; Richard K Wilson; Huanming Yang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Analysis of mortality rates for pancreatic cancer across the world.

Authors:  D Hariharan; A Saied; H M Kocher
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Pancreatic Expression database: a generic model for the organization, integration and mining of complex cancer datasets.

Authors:  Claude Chelala; Stephan A Hahn; Hannah J Whiteman; Sayka Barry; Deepak Hariharan; Tomasz P Radon; Nicholas R Lemoine; Tatjana Crnogorac-Jurcevic
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  The distributed annotation system.

Authors:  R D Dowell; R M Jokerst; A Day; S R Eddy; L Stein
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2001-10-10       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Reactome knowledgebase of human biological pathways and processes.

Authors:  Lisa Matthews; Gopal Gopinath; Marc Gillespie; Michael Caudy; David Croft; Bernard de Bono; Phani Garapati; Jill Hemish; Henning Hermjakob; Bijay Jassal; Alex Kanapin; Suzanna Lewis; Shahana Mahajan; Bruce May; Esther Schmidt; Imre Vastrik; Guanming Wu; Ewan Birney; Lincoln Stein; Peter D'Eustachio
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  BioMart Central Portal--unified access to biological data.

Authors:  Syed Haider; Benoit Ballester; Damian Smedley; Junjun Zhang; Peter Rice; Arek Kasprzyk
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  The UCSC Genome Browser database: update 2010.

Authors:  Brooke Rhead; Donna Karolchik; Robert M Kuhn; Angie S Hinrichs; Ann S Zweig; Pauline A Fujita; Mark Diekhans; Kayla E Smith; Kate R Rosenbloom; Brian J Raney; Andy Pohl; Michael Pheasant; Laurence R Meyer; Katrina Learned; Fan Hsu; Jennifer Hillman-Jackson; Rachel A Harte; Belinda Giardine; Timothy R Dreszer; Hiram Clawson; Galt P Barber; David Haussler; W James Kent
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) in 2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  PRIDE: new developments and new datasets.

Authors:  Philip Jones; Richard G Côté; Sang Yun Cho; Sebastian Klie; Lennart Martens; Antony F Quinn; David Thorneycroft; Henning Hermjakob
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  15 in total

1.  Identification of germline genomic copy number variation in familial pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Wigdan Al-Sukhni; Sarah Joe; Anath C Lionel; Nora Zwingerman; George Zogopoulos; Christian R Marshall; Ayelet Borgida; Spring Holter; Aaron Gropper; Sara Moore; Melissa Bondy; Alison P Klein; Gloria M Petersen; Kari G Rabe; Ann G Schwartz; Sapna Syngal; Stephen W Scherer; Steven Gallinger
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Integration of proteomics into systems biology of cancer.

Authors:  S Hanash; M Schliekelman; Q Zhang; A Taguchi
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2012-03-08

Review 3.  Reuse of public genome-wide gene expression data.

Authors:  Johan Rung; Alvis Brazma
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  miR-148a- and miR-216a-regulated oncolytic adenoviruses targeting pancreatic tumors attenuate tissue damage without perturbation of miRNA activity.

Authors:  Xavier Bofill-De Ros; Meritxell Gironella; Cristina Fillat
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 11.454

5.  Using BioMart as a framework to manage and query pancreatic cancer data.

Authors:  Rosalind J Cutts; Emanuela Gadaleta; Nicholas R Lemoine; Claude Chelala
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  A global insight into a cancer transcriptional space using pancreatic data: importance, findings and flaws.

Authors:  Emanuela Gadaleta; Rosalind J Cutts; Gavin P Kelly; Tatjana Crnogorac-Jurcevic; Hemant M Kocher; Nicholas R Lemoine; Claude Chelala
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Sgo1 is a potential therapeutic target for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Lyu-Han Wang; Chia-Jui Yen; Tian-Neng Li; Sabine Elowe; Wen-Ching Wang; Lily Hui-Ching Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-02-10

Review 8.  MicroRNA Targeted Therapeutic Approach for Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Yiwei Li; Fazlul H Sarkar
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 6.580

9.  Molecular analysis of precursor lesions in familial pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Tatjana Crnogorac-Jurcevic; Claude Chelala; Sayka Barry; Tomohiko Harada; Vipul Bhakta; Sam Lattimore; Stipo Jurcevic; Mary Bronner; Nicholas R Lemoine; Teresa A Brentnall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The pancreatic expression database: recent extensions and updates.

Authors:  Abu Z Dayem Ullah; Rosalind J Cutts; Millika Ghetia; Emanuela Gadaleta; Stephan A Hahn; Tatjana Crnogorac-Jurcevic; Nicholas R Lemoine; Claude Chelala
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.