Literature DB >> 20957657

Rates of change and sensitivity to change in cartilage morphology in healthy knees and in knees with mild, moderate, and end-stage radiographic osteoarthritis: results from 831 participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Felix Eckstein1, Michael Nevitt, Alberto Gimona, Kristen Picha, Jennifer H Lee, Richard Y Davies, Donatus Dreher, Olivier Benichou, Marie-Pierre Hellio Le Graverand, Martin Hudelmaier, Susanne Maschek, Wolfgang Wirth.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the longitudinal rate of (and sensitivity to) change of knee cartilage thickness across defined stages of radiographic osteoarthritis (OA), specifically healthy knees and knees with end-stage radiographic OA.
METHODS: One knee of 831 Osteoarthritis Initiative participants was examined: 112 healthy knees, without radiographic OA or risk factors for knee OA, and 719 radiographic OA knees (310 calculated Kellgren/Lawrence [K/L] grade 2, 300 calculated K/L grade 3, and 109 calculated K/L grade 4). Subregional change in thickness was assessed after segmentation of weight-bearing femorotibial cartilage at baseline and 1 year from coronal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Regional and ordered values (OVs) of change were compared by baseline radiographic OA status.
RESULTS: Healthy knees displayed small changes in plates and subregions (±0.7%; standardized response mean [SRM] ±0.15), with OVs being symmetrically distributed close to zero. In calculated K/L grade 2 knees, changes in cartilage thickness were small (<1%; minimal SRM -0.22) and not significantly different from healthy knees. Knees with calculated K/L grade 3 showed substantial loss of cartilage thickness (up to -2.5%; minimal SRM -0.35), with OV1 changes being significantly (P < 0.05) greater than those in healthy knees. Calculated K/L grade 4 knees displayed the largest rate of loss across radiographic OA grades (up to -3.9%; minimal SRM -0.51), with OV1 changes also significantly (P < 0.05) greater than in healthy knees.
CONCLUSION: MRI-based cartilage thickness showed high rates of loss in knees with moderate and end-stage radiographic OA, and small rates (indistinguishable from healthy knees) in mild radiographic OA. From the perspective of sensitivity to change, end-stage radiographic OA knees need not be excluded from longitudinal studies using MRI cartilage morphology as an end point.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20957657      PMCID: PMC3106126          DOI: 10.1002/acr.20370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)        ISSN: 2151-464X            Impact factor:   4.794


  46 in total

1.  OARSI/OMERACT criteria of being considered a candidate for total joint replacement in knee/hip osteoarthritis as an endpoint in clinical trials evaluating potential disease modifying osteoarthritic drugs.

Authors:  Maxime Dougados; Gillian Hawker; Stefan Lohmander; Aileen M Davis; Paul Dieppe; Jean-Francis Maillefert; Laure Gossec
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.666

2.  Does the use of ordered values of subregional change in cartilage thickness improve the detection of disease progression in longitudinal studies of osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Robert J Buck; Bradley T Wyman; Marie-Pierre Hellio Le Graverand; Martin Hudelmaier; Wolfgang Wirth; Felix Eckstein
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-07-15

Review 3.  The osteoarthritis initiative: report on the design rationale for the magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the knee.

Authors:  C G Peterfy; E Schneider; M Nevitt
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based cartilage loss in painful contralateral knees with and without radiographic joint space narrowing: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Felix Eckstein; Olivier Benichou; Wolfgang Wirth; David R Nelson; Susanne Maschek; Martin Hudelmaier; C Kent Kwoh; Ali Guermazi; David Hunter
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-09-15

5.  Change in cartilage morphometry: a sample of the progression cohort of the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  D J Hunter; J Niu; Y Zhang; S Totterman; J Tamez; C Dabrowski; R Davies; M-P Hellio Le Graverand; M Luchi; Y Tymofyeyev; C R Beals
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2008-04-13       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Change in regional cartilage morphology and joint space width in osteoarthritis participants versus healthy controls: a multicentre study using 3.0 Tesla MRI and Lyon-Schuss radiography.

Authors:  M-P Hellio Le Graverand; R J Buck; B T Wyman; E Vignon; S A Mazzuca; K D Brandt; M Piperno; H C Charles; M Hudelmaier; D J Hunter; C Jackson; V Byers Kraus; T M Link; S Majumdar; P V Prasad; T J Schnitzer; A Vaz; W Wirth; F Eckstein
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  One year change of knee cartilage morphology in the first release of participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative progression subcohort: association with sex, body mass index, symptoms and radiographic osteoarthritis status.

Authors:  F Eckstein; S Maschek; W Wirth; M Hudelmaier; W Hitzl; B Wyman; M Nevitt; M-P Hellio Le Graverand
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Protective effects of licofelone, a 5-lipoxygenase and cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor, versus naproxen on cartilage loss in knee osteoarthritis: a first multicentre clinical trial using quantitative MRI.

Authors:  J-P Raynauld; J Martel-Pelletier; P Bias; S Laufer; B Haraoui; D Choquette; A D Beaulieu; F Abram; M Dorais; E Vignon; J-P Pelletier
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Is obesity a risk factor for progressive radiographic knee osteoarthritis?

Authors:  J Niu; Y Q Zhang; J Torner; M Nevitt; C E Lewis; P Aliabadi; B Sack; M Clancy; L Sharma; D T Felson
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-03-15

10.  Relationship of compartment-specific structural knee status at baseline with change in cartilage morphology: a prospective observational study using data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Felix Eckstein; Wolfgang Wirth; Martin I Hudelmaier; Susanne Maschek; Wolfgang Hitzl; Bradley T Wyman; Michael Nevitt; Marie-Pierre Hellio Le Graverand; David Hunter
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  An illustrative overview of semi-quantitative MRI scoring of knee osteoarthritis: lessons learned from longitudinal observational studies.

Authors:  F W Roemer; D J Hunter; M D Crema; C K Kwoh; E Ochoa-Albiztegui; A Guermazi
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Greater Lateral Femorotibial Cartilage Loss in Osteoarthritis Initiative Participants With Incident Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Wolfgang Hitzl; Wolfgang Wirth; Susanne Maschek; Sebastian Cotofana; Michael Nevitt; Markus R John; Christoph Ladel; Felix Eckstein
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  How do short-term rates of femorotibial cartilage change compare to long-term changes? Four year follow-up data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  F Eckstein; C E Mc Culloch; J A Lynch; M Nevitt; C K Kwoh; S Maschek; M Hudelmaier; L Sharma; W Wirth
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Cartilage survival of the knee strongly depends on malalignment: a survival analysis from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI).

Authors:  Martin Faschingbauer; M Kasparek; W Waldstein; P Schadler; H Reichel; F Boettner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Severe radiographic knee osteoarthritis--does Kellgren and Lawrence grade 4 represent end stage disease?--the MOST study.

Authors:  A Guermazi; D Hayashi; F Roemer; D T Felson; K Wang; J Lynch; S Amin; J Torner; C E Lewis; M C Nevitt
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  Predictive and concurrent validity of cartilage thickness change as a marker of knee osteoarthritis progression: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  W Wirth; D J Hunter; M C Nevitt; L Sharma; C K Kwoh; C Ladel; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Rates and sensitivity of knee cartilage thickness loss in specific central reading radiographic strata from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  S Maschek; W Wirth; C Ladel; M-P Hellio Le Graverand; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 8.  Imaging of cartilage and bone: promises and pitfalls in clinical trials of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  F Eckstein; A Guermazi; G Gold; J Duryea; M-P Hellio Le Graverand; W Wirth; C G Miller
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Tibial coverage, meniscus position, size and damage in knees discordant for joint space narrowing - data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  K Bloecker; A Guermazi; W Wirth; O Benichou; C K Kwoh; D J Hunter; M Englund; H Resch; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Baseline Cartilage Thickness and Meniscus Extrusion Predict Longitudinal Cartilage Loss by Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Jason S Klein; Jean Jose; Michael G Baraga; Ty K Subhawong
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.