OBJECTIVE: To study the longitudinal rate of (and sensitivity to) change of knee cartilage thickness across defined stages of radiographic osteoarthritis (OA), specifically healthy knees and knees with end-stage radiographic OA. METHODS: One knee of 831 Osteoarthritis Initiative participants was examined: 112 healthy knees, without radiographic OA or risk factors for knee OA, and 719 radiographic OA knees (310 calculated Kellgren/Lawrence [K/L] grade 2, 300 calculated K/L grade 3, and 109 calculated K/L grade 4). Subregional change in thickness was assessed after segmentation of weight-bearing femorotibial cartilage at baseline and 1 year from coronal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Regional and ordered values (OVs) of change were compared by baseline radiographic OA status. RESULTS: Healthy knees displayed small changes in plates and subregions (±0.7%; standardized response mean [SRM] ±0.15), with OVs being symmetrically distributed close to zero. In calculated K/L grade 2 knees, changes in cartilage thickness were small (<1%; minimal SRM -0.22) and not significantly different from healthy knees. Knees with calculated K/L grade 3 showed substantial loss of cartilage thickness (up to -2.5%; minimal SRM -0.35), with OV1 changes being significantly (P < 0.05) greater than those in healthy knees. Calculated K/L grade 4 knees displayed the largest rate of loss across radiographic OA grades (up to -3.9%; minimal SRM -0.51), with OV1 changes also significantly (P < 0.05) greater than in healthy knees. CONCLUSION: MRI-based cartilage thickness showed high rates of loss in knees with moderate and end-stage radiographic OA, and small rates (indistinguishable from healthy knees) in mild radiographic OA. From the perspective of sensitivity to change, end-stage radiographic OA knees need not be excluded from longitudinal studies using MRI cartilage morphology as an end point.
OBJECTIVE: To study the longitudinal rate of (and sensitivity to) change of knee cartilage thickness across defined stages of radiographic osteoarthritis (OA), specifically healthy knees and knees with end-stage radiographic OA. METHODS: One knee of 831 Osteoarthritis Initiative participants was examined: 112 healthy knees, without radiographic OA or risk factors for knee OA, and 719 radiographic OA knees (310 calculated Kellgren/Lawrence [K/L] grade 2, 300 calculated K/L grade 3, and 109 calculated K/L grade 4). Subregional change in thickness was assessed after segmentation of weight-bearing femorotibial cartilage at baseline and 1 year from coronal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Regional and ordered values (OVs) of change were compared by baseline radiographic OA status. RESULTS: Healthy knees displayed small changes in plates and subregions (±0.7%; standardized response mean [SRM] ±0.15), with OVs being symmetrically distributed close to zero. In calculated K/L grade 2 knees, changes in cartilage thickness were small (<1%; minimal SRM -0.22) and not significantly different from healthy knees. Knees with calculated K/L grade 3 showed substantial loss of cartilage thickness (up to -2.5%; minimal SRM -0.35), with OV1 changes being significantly (P < 0.05) greater than those in healthy knees. Calculated K/L grade 4 knees displayed the largest rate of loss across radiographic OA grades (up to -3.9%; minimal SRM -0.51), with OV1 changes also significantly (P < 0.05) greater than in healthy knees. CONCLUSION: MRI-based cartilage thickness showed high rates of loss in knees with moderate and end-stage radiographic OA, and small rates (indistinguishable from healthy knees) in mild radiographic OA. From the perspective of sensitivity to change, end-stage radiographic OA knees need not be excluded from longitudinal studies using MRI cartilage morphology as an end point.
Authors: Robert J Buck; Bradley T Wyman; Marie-Pierre Hellio Le Graverand; Martin Hudelmaier; Wolfgang Wirth; Felix Eckstein Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2009-07-15
Authors: Felix Eckstein; Olivier Benichou; Wolfgang Wirth; David R Nelson; Susanne Maschek; Martin Hudelmaier; C Kent Kwoh; Ali Guermazi; David Hunter Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2009-09-15
Authors: D J Hunter; J Niu; Y Zhang; S Totterman; J Tamez; C Dabrowski; R Davies; M-P Hellio Le Graverand; M Luchi; Y Tymofyeyev; C R Beals Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2008-04-13 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: M-P Hellio Le Graverand; R J Buck; B T Wyman; E Vignon; S A Mazzuca; K D Brandt; M Piperno; H C Charles; M Hudelmaier; D J Hunter; C Jackson; V Byers Kraus; T M Link; S Majumdar; P V Prasad; T J Schnitzer; A Vaz; W Wirth; F Eckstein Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: F Eckstein; S Maschek; W Wirth; M Hudelmaier; W Hitzl; B Wyman; M Nevitt; M-P Hellio Le Graverand Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2008-06-02 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: J-P Raynauld; J Martel-Pelletier; P Bias; S Laufer; B Haraoui; D Choquette; A D Beaulieu; F Abram; M Dorais; E Vignon; J-P Pelletier Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2008-07-23 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Felix Eckstein; Wolfgang Wirth; Martin I Hudelmaier; Susanne Maschek; Wolfgang Hitzl; Bradley T Wyman; Michael Nevitt; Marie-Pierre Hellio Le Graverand; David Hunter Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2009-06-17 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: F W Roemer; D J Hunter; M D Crema; C K Kwoh; E Ochoa-Albiztegui; A Guermazi Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Wolfgang Hitzl; Wolfgang Wirth; Susanne Maschek; Sebastian Cotofana; Michael Nevitt; Markus R John; Christoph Ladel; Felix Eckstein Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: F Eckstein; C E Mc Culloch; J A Lynch; M Nevitt; C K Kwoh; S Maschek; M Hudelmaier; L Sharma; W Wirth Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2012-07-16 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Martin Faschingbauer; M Kasparek; W Waldstein; P Schadler; H Reichel; F Boettner Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2019-03-06 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: A Guermazi; D Hayashi; F Roemer; D T Felson; K Wang; J Lynch; S Amin; J Torner; C E Lewis; M C Nevitt Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: W Wirth; D J Hunter; M C Nevitt; L Sharma; C K Kwoh; C Ladel; F Eckstein Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: F Eckstein; A Guermazi; G Gold; J Duryea; M-P Hellio Le Graverand; W Wirth; C G Miller Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: K Bloecker; A Guermazi; W Wirth; O Benichou; C K Kwoh; D J Hunter; M Englund; H Resch; F Eckstein Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2012-12-05 Impact factor: 6.576