OBJECTIVE: To determine by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), whether knees with advanced radiographic disease (medial joint space narrowing [mJSN]) encounter greater longitudinal cartilage loss than contralateral knees with earlier disease (no or less mJSN). METHODS: Participants were selected from 2,678 cases in the Osteoarthritis Initiative, based on exhibition of bilateral pain, body mass index >25 (kg/m(2)), mJSN in 1 knee, no or less mJSN in the contralateral knee, and no lateral JSN in both knees. Eighty participants (mean +/- SD age 60.6 +/- 9.1 years) fulfilled these criteria. Medial tibial and femoral cartilage morphology was analyzed from the baseline and the 1-year followup MRI (sagittal double echo at steady state by 3.0T) of both knees by experienced readers blinded to the time point and mJSN status. RESULTS: Knees with more radiographic mJSN displayed greater medial cartilage loss (-80 mum) assessed by MRI than contralateral knees with less mJSN (-57 mum). The difference reached statistical significance in participants with an mJSN grade of 2 or 3 (P = 0.005-0.08), but not in participants with an mJSN grade of 1 (P = 0.28-0.98). In knees with more mJSN, cartilage loss increased with higher grades of mJSN (P = 0.003 in the medial femur). Knees with an mJSN grade of 2 or 3 displayed greater cartilage loss in the weight-bearing medial femur than in the posterior femur or in the medial tibia (P = 0.048). CONCLUSION: Knees with advanced mJSN displayed greater cartilage loss than contralateral knees with less mJSN. These data suggest that radiography can be used to stratify fast structural progressors, and that MRI cartilage thickness loss is more pronounced at advanced radiographic disease stage.
OBJECTIVE: To determine by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), whether knees with advanced radiographic disease (medial joint space narrowing [mJSN]) encounter greater longitudinal cartilage loss than contralateral knees with earlier disease (no or less mJSN). METHODS:Participants were selected from 2,678 cases in the Osteoarthritis Initiative, based on exhibition of bilateral pain, body mass index >25 (kg/m(2)), mJSN in 1 knee, no or less mJSN in the contralateral knee, and no lateral JSN in both knees. Eighty participants (mean +/- SD age 60.6 +/- 9.1 years) fulfilled these criteria. Medial tibial and femoral cartilage morphology was analyzed from the baseline and the 1-year followup MRI (sagittal double echo at steady state by 3.0T) of both knees by experienced readers blinded to the time point and mJSN status. RESULTS: Knees with more radiographic mJSN displayed greater medial cartilage loss (-80 mum) assessed by MRI than contralateral knees with less mJSN (-57 mum). The difference reached statistical significance in participants with an mJSN grade of 2 or 3 (P = 0.005-0.08), but not in participants with an mJSN grade of 1 (P = 0.28-0.98). In knees with more mJSN, cartilage loss increased with higher grades of mJSN (P = 0.003 in the medial femur). Knees with an mJSN grade of 2 or 3 displayed greater cartilage loss in the weight-bearing medial femur than in the posterior femur or in the medial tibia (P = 0.048). CONCLUSION: Knees with advanced mJSN displayed greater cartilage loss than contralateral knees with less mJSN. These data suggest that radiography can be used to stratify fast structural progressors, and that MRI cartilage thickness loss is more pronounced at advanced radiographic disease stage.
Authors: D T Felson; D R Gale; M Elon Gale; J Niu; D J Hunter; J Goggins; M P Lavalley Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2004-09-20 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: M-P H Le Graverand; S Mazzuca; M Lassere; A Guermazi; E Pickering; K Brandt; C Peterfy; G Cline; M Nevitt; T Woodworth; P Conaghan; E Vignon Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2006 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: F Eckstein; M Hudelmaier; W Wirth; B Kiefer; R Jackson; J Yu; C B Eaton; E Schneider Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2005-08-26 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Kenneth D Brandt; Steven A Mazzuca; Barry P Katz; Kathleen A Lane; Kenneth A Buckwalter; David E Yocum; Frederick Wolfe; Thomas J Schnitzer; Larry W Moreland; Susan Manzi; John D Bradley; Leena Sharma; Chester V Oddis; Steven T Hugenberg; Louis W Heck Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2005-07
Authors: O Bruyere; A Honore; O Ethgen; L C Rovati; G Giacovelli; Y E Henrotin; L Seidel; J-Y L Reginster Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Jean-Pierre Raynauld; Johanne Martel-Pelletier; Marie-Josée Berthiaume; Gilles Beaudoin; Denis Choquette; Boulos Haraoui; Hyman Tannenbaum; Joan M Meyer; John F Beary; Gary A Cline; Jean-Pierre Pelletier Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2005-12-30 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: F Eckstein; W Wirth; D J Hunter; A Guermazi; C K Kwoh; D R Nelson; O Benichou Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2010-02-18 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: W Wirth; S Larroque; R Y Davies; M Nevitt; A Gimona; F Baribaud; J H Lee; O Benichou; B T Wyman; M Hudelmaier; S Maschek; F Eckstein Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2010-10-31 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: R B Frobell; W Wirth; M Nevitt; B T Wyman; O Benichou; D Dreher; R Y Davies; J H Lee; F Baribaud; A Gimona; M Hudelmaier; S Cotofana; F Eckstein Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2010-02-06 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: F Eckstein; C E Mc Culloch; J A Lynch; M Nevitt; C K Kwoh; S Maschek; M Hudelmaier; L Sharma; W Wirth Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2012-07-16 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: K Bloecker; A Guermazi; W Wirth; O Benichou; C K Kwoh; D J Hunter; M Englund; H Resch; F Eckstein Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2012-12-05 Impact factor: 6.576