Literature DB >> 20957635

Radiolabeled cetuximab: dose optimization for epidermal growth factor receptor imaging in a head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma model.

Bianca A W Hoeben1, Janneke D M Molkenboer-Kuenen, Wim J G Oyen, Wenny J M Peeters, Johannes H A M Kaanders, Johan Bussink, Otto C Boerman.   

Abstract

Noninvasive imaging of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma could be of value to select patients for EGFR-targeted therapy. We assessed dose optimization of (111) Indium-DTPA-cetuximab ((111) In-cetuximab) for EGFR imaging in a head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma xenograft model. (111) In-cetuximab slowly internalized into FaDu cells in vitro, amounting to 1.0 × 10(4) molecules cetuximab per cell after 24 hr (15.8% of added activity). In nude mice with subcutaneous FaDu xenograft tumors, a protein dose escalation study with (111) In-cetuximab showed highest specific accumulation in tumors at protein doses between 1 and 30 μg per mouse (mean tumor uptake 33.1 ± 3.1%ID/g, 3 days postinjection (p.i.)). The biodistribution of (111) In-cetuximab and (125) I-cetuximab was determined at 1, 3 and 7 days p.i. at optimal protein dose. Tumor uptake was favorable for (111) In-cetuximab compared to (125) I-cetuximab. With pixel-by-pixel analysis, good correlations were found between intratumoral distribution of (111) In-cetuximab as determined by autoradiography and EGFR expression in the same tumor sections as determined immunohistochemically (mean r = 0.74 ± 0.14; all correlations p < 0.0001). Micro Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (MicroSPECT) scans clearly visualized FaDu tumors from 1 day p.i. onward and tumor-to-background contrast increased until 7 days p.i. (tumor-to-liver ratios 0.58 ± 0.24, 3.42 ± 0.66, 8.99 ± 4.66 and 16.33 ± 11.56, at day 0, day 1, day 3 and day 7 p.i., respectively). Our study suggests that, at optimal cetuximab imaging dose, (111) In-cetuximab can be used for visualization of EGFR expression in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma using SPECT.
Copyright © 2010 UICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20957635     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  19 in total

1.  Is Tumor Cell Specificity Distinct from Tumor Selectivity In Vivo?: A Quantitative NIR Molecular Imaging Analysis of Nanoliposome Targeting.

Authors:  Girgis Obaid; Kimberley Samkoe; Kenneth Tichauer; Shazia Bano; Yeonjae Park; Zachary Silber; Sassan Hodge; Susan Callaghan; Mina Guirguis; Srivalleesha Mallidi; Brian Pogue; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Nano Res       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 8.897

2.  Biodistribution, pharmacokinetics and radioimmunotherapy of 188Re-cetuximab in NCI-H292 human lung tumor-bearing nude mice.

Authors:  Ya-Jen Chang; Chung-Li Ho; Kai-Hung Cheng; Wan-I Kuo; Wan-Chi Lee; Keng-Li Lan; Chih-Hsien Chang
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  A comprehensively revised strategy that improves the specific activity and long-term stability of clinically relevant 89Zr-immuno-PET agents.

Authors:  Nikunj B Bhatt; Darpan N Pandya; Stephanie Rideout-Danner; Howard D Gage; Frank C Marini; Thaddeus J Wadas
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.390

4.  89Zr-DFO-Cetuximab as a Molecular Imaging Agent to Identify Cetuximab Resistance in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Raquel Benedetto; Adriana V F Massicano; Bryant K Crenshaw; Renato Oliveira; Rui M Reis; Elaine B Araújo; Suzanne E Lapi
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.099

5.  EGFR-Targeted ImmunoPET of UMUC3 Orthotopic Bladder Tumors.

Authors:  Tran T Hoang; Komal Mandleywala; Tara Viray; Kel Vin Tan; Jason S Lewis; Patricia M R Pereira
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.484

6.  Performance evaluation of small-animal multipinhole μSPECT scanners for mouse imaging.

Authors:  Steven Deleye; Roel Van Holen; Jeroen Verhaeghe; Stefaan Vandenberghe; Sigrid Stroobants; Steven Staelens
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Theranostic applications of antibodies in oncology.

Authors:  Emmy D G Fleuren; Yvonne M H Versleijen-Jonkers; Sandra Heskamp; Carla M L van Herpen; Wim J G Oyen; Winette T A van der Graaf; Otto C Boerman
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 6.603

8.  Radiolabeled Cetuximab Conjugates for EGFR Targeted Cancer Diagnostics and Therapy.

Authors:  Wiebke Sihver; Jens Pietzsch; Mechthild Krause; Michael Baumann; Jörg Steinbach; Hans-Jürgen Pietzsch
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2014-03-05

9.  Systematic analysis of 18F-FDG PET and metabolism, proliferation and hypoxia markers for classification of head and neck tumors.

Authors:  Bianca A W Hoeben; Maud H W Starmans; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Ludwig J Dubois; Albert J van der Kogel; Johannes H A M Kaanders; Paul C Boutros; Philippe Lambin; Johan Bussink
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Zirconium-89 labeled antibodies: a new tool for molecular imaging in cancer patients.

Authors:  Floor C J van de Watering; Mark Rijpkema; Lars Perk; Ulrich Brinkmann; Wim J G Oyen; Otto C Boerman
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.