Literature DB >> 20957580

The similarity-in-topography principle: reconciling theories of conceptual deficits.

W Kyle Simmons1, Lawrence W Barsalou.   

Abstract

Three theories currently compete to explain the conceptual deficits that result from brain damage: sensory-functional theory, domain-specific theory, and conceptual structure theory. We argue that all three theories capture important aspects of conceptual deficits, and offer different insights into their origins. Conceptual topography theory (CTT) integrates these insights, beginning with A. R. Damasio's (1989) convergence zone theory and elaborating it with the similarity-in-topography (SIT) principle. According to CTT, feature maps in sensory-motor systems represent the features of a category's exemplars. A hierarchical system of convergence zones then conjoins these features to form both property and category representations. According to the SIT principle, the proximity of two conjunctive neurons in a convergence zone increases with the similarity of the features they conjoin. As a result, conjunctive neurons become topographically organised into local regions that represent properties and categories. Depending on the level and location of a lesion in this system, a wide variety of deficits is possible. Consistent with the literature, these deficits range from the loss of a single category to the loss of multiple categories that share sensory-motor properties.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 20957580     DOI: 10.1080/02643290342000032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0264-3294            Impact factor:   2.468


  81 in total

1.  Perceptual simulation in property verification.

Authors:  Karen Olseth Solomon; Lawrence W Barsalou
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-03

2.  An integrated neural model of semantic memory, lexical retrieval and category formation, based on a distributed feature representation.

Authors:  Mauro Ursino; Cristiano Cuppini; Elisa Magosso
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  Manipulability and object recognition: is manipulability a semantic feature?

Authors:  Fabio Campanella; Tim Shallice
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Concept Representation Reflects Multimodal Abstraction: A Framework for Embodied Semantics.

Authors:  Leonardo Fernandino; Jeffrey R Binder; Rutvik H Desai; Suzanne L Pendl; Colin J Humphries; William L Gross; Lisa L Conant; Mark S Seidenberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  The role of action representations in visual object recognition.

Authors:  Hannah Barbara Helbig; Markus Graf; Markus Kiefer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Distinct and common cortical activations for multimodal semantic categories.

Authors:  R F Goldberg; C A Perfetti; W Schneider
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  What is embodied about cognition?

Authors:  Bradford Z Mahon
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.331

8.  Activating event knowledge.

Authors:  Mary Hare; Michael Jones; Caroline Thomson; Sarah Kelly; Ken McRae
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-03-18

9.  The Two-Level Theory of verb meaning: An approach to integrating the semantics of action with the mirror neuron system.

Authors:  David Kemmerer; Javier Gonzalez-Castillo
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Category-specific naming and recognition deficits in temporal lobe epilepsy surgical patients.

Authors:  Daniel L Drane; George A Ojemann; Elizabeth Aylward; Jeffrey G Ojemann; L Clark Johnson; Daniel L Silbergeld; John W Miller; Daniel Tranel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.