Literature DB >> 20096450

Incidence of 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1 infection in England: a cross-sectional serological study.

Elizabeth Miller1, Katja Hoschler, Pia Hardelid, Elaine Stanford, Nick Andrews, Maria Zambon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the age-specific prevalence of immunity from, and incidence of infection with, 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1 virus is essential for modelling the future burden of disease and the effectiveness of interventions such as vaccination.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional serological survey, we obtained 1403 serum samples taken in 2008 (before the first wave of H1N1 infection) and 1954 serum samples taken in August and September, 2009 (after the first wave of infection) as part of the annual collection for the Health Protection Agency seroepidemiology programme from patients accessing health care in England. Antibody titres were measured by use of haemagglutination inhibition and microneutralisation assays. We calculated the proportion of samples with antibodies to pandemic H1N1 virus in 2008 by age group and compared the proportion of samples with haemagglutination inhibition titre 1:32 or more (deemed a protective response) before the first wave of infection with the proportion after the first wave.
FINDINGS: In the baseline serum samples from 2008, haemagglutination inhibition and microneutralisation antibody titres increased significantly with age (F test p<0.0001). The proportion of samples with haemagglutination inhibition titre 1:32 or more ranged from 1.8% (three of 171; 95% CI 0.6-5.0) in children aged 0-4 years to 31.3% (52 of 166; 24.8-38.7) in adults aged 80 years or older. In London and the West Midlands, the difference in the proportion of samples with haemagglutination inhibition titre equal to or above 1:32 between baseline and September, 2009, was 21.3% (95% CI 8.8-40.3) for children younger than 5 years of age, 42.0% (26.3-58.2) for 5-14-year-olds, and 20.6% (1.6-42.4) for 15-24-year-olds, with no difference between baseline and September in older age groups. In other regions, only children younger than 15 years showed a significant increase from baseline (6.3%, 1.8-12.9).
INTERPRETATION: Around one child in every three was infected with 2009 pandemic H1N1 in the first wave of infection in regions with a high incidence, ten times more than estimated from clinical surveillance. Pre-existing antibody in older age groups protects against infection. Children have an important role in transmission of influenza and would be a key target group for vaccination both for their protection and for the protection of others through herd immunity. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20096450     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62126-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  349 in total

Review 1.  The role of seroepidemiology in the comprehensive surveillance of vaccine-preventable diseases.

Authors:  Sarah E Wilson; Shelley L Deeks; Todd F Hatchette; Natasha S Crowcroft
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Seasonal H1N1 influenza virus infection induces cross-protective pandemic H1N1 virus immunity through a CD8-independent, B cell-dependent mechanism.

Authors:  Yuan Fang; David Banner; Alyson A Kelvin; Stephen S H Huang; Christopher J Paige; Steven A Corfe; Kevin P Kane; R Chris Bleackley; Thomas Rowe; Alberto J Leon; David J Kelvin
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  H1N1v at a seroepidemiological glance: is the nightmare over?

Authors:  C Reinheimer; H W Doerr; I Friedrichs; M Stürmer; R Allwinn
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Antibody prevalence to the 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus in Germany: geographically variable immunity in winter 2010/2011.

Authors:  Anne Hackenberg; Gökhan Arman-Kalcek; Jens Hiller; Gülsah Gabriel
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Estimated cumulative incidence of pandemic (H1N1) influenza among pregnant women during the first wave of the 2009 pandemic.

Authors:  Salaheddin M Mahmud; Marissa Becker; Yoav Keynan; Lawrence Elliott; Laura H Thompson; Keith Fowke; Lisa Avery; Paul Van Caeseele; Sande Harlos; James Blanchard; Magdy Dawood
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Neurologic and muscular complications of the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic.

Authors:  Larry E Davis
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.081

7.  Portrait of a year-old pandemic.

Authors:  Declan Butler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Prevalence of seroprotection against the pandemic (H1N1) virus after the 2009 pandemic.

Authors:  Danuta M Skowronski; Travis S Hottes; Naveed Z Janjua; Dale Purych; Suzana Sabaiduc; Tracy Chan; Gaston De Serres; Jennifer Gardy; Janet E McElhaney; David M Patrick; Martin Petric
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  A case report of a patient in whom antibodies against the 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 virus have been present since June 1999.

Authors:  Masashi Yoshida; Hirotoshi Sugino; Tadashi Iizuka; Liu Xiaofang; Akira Suzuki; Hitoshi Oshitani; Tatsuo Suzutani; Kazufumi Ikuta
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Employer-incurred health care costs and productivity losses associated with influenza.

Authors:  Sudeep Karve; Derek A Misurski; Genevieve Meier; Keith L Davis
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.