Literature DB >> 20955273

Biocompatibility of heparin-grafted hemodialysis membranes: impact on monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 circulating level and oxidative status.

Marion Morena1, Isabelle Jaussent, Lotfi Chalabi, Anne-Sophie Bargnoux, Anne-Marie Dupuy, Stéphanie Badiou, Claire Rakic, Michel Thomas, Bernard Canaud, Jean-Paul Cristol, Françoise Michel.   

Abstract

This prospective observational study aimed at evaluating efficacy and biocompatibility performances of the new heparin-coated Evodial dialyzers with/without systemic heparin reduction. After a 4-week wash-out period with reference polysulfone F70S dialyzers, 6 hemodialysis patients were sequentially dialyzed with Evodial, F70S, and Evodial dialyzers using 30% heparin reduction, each period of treatment was 4 weeks. Removal rates (RR) (urea, creatinine, and β2-microglobulin), dialysis dose, and instantaneous clearances (urea and creatinine) were measured as well as inflammatory (C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, interleukin 6, tumor necrosis factor α, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) and oxidative stress (OS) (superoxide anion, homocysteine, and isoprostanes) parameters at the end of each study period. Patients treated with Evodial or F70S dialyzers for 4 weeks presented comparable dialysis efficacy parameters including urea and creatinine RR, dialysis dose and instantaneous clearances. By contrast, a significantly lower but reasonably good β2-microglobulin RR was achieved with Evodial dialyzers. Regarding biocompatibility, no significant difference was observed with inflammation and OS except for postdialysis monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 which significantly decreased with Evodial dialyzers. Thirty percent heparinization reduction with Evodial dialyzers did not induce any change in inflammation but led to an improvement in OS as demonstrated by a decrease in postdialysis superoxide production and predialysis homocysteine and isoprostane. This bioactive dialyzer together with heparin dose reduction represents a good trade-off between efficacy and biocompatibility performance (improvement in OS with a weak decrease in efficacy) and its use is encouraging for hemodialysis patients not only in reducing OS but also in improving patient comorbid conditions due to lesser heparin side effects.
© 2010 The Authors. Hemodialysis International © 2010 International Society for Hemodialysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20955273     DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2010.00494.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hemodial Int        ISSN: 1492-7535            Impact factor:   1.812


  7 in total

1.  Surface modification of polysulfone based hemodialysis membranes with layer by layer self assembly of polyethyleneimine/alginate-heparin: a simple polyelectrolyte blend approach for heparin immobilization.

Authors:  Filiz Yasar Mahlicli; Sacide Alsoy Altinkaya
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  Modified Lipids and Lipoproteins in Chronic Kidney Disease: A New Class of Uremic Toxins.

Authors:  Nans Florens; Catherine Calzada; Egor Lyasko; Laurent Juillard; Christophe O Soulage
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 4.546

3.  Unexpected and striking effect of heparin-free dialysis on cytokine release.

Authors:  Alicja Rydzewska-Rosolowska; Joanna Gozdzikiewicz-Lapinska; Jacek Borawski; Ewa Koc-Zorawska; Michal Mysliwiec; Beata Naumnik
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Arteriovenous access in hemodialysis: A multidisciplinary perspective for future solutions.

Authors:  Bernd Stegmayr; Christian Willems; Thomas Groth; Albino Martins; Nuno M Neves; Khosrow Mottaghy; Andrea Remuzzi; Beat Walpoth
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 1.595

5.  Rationale and design of the HepZero study: a prospective, multicenter, international, open, randomized, controlled clinical study with parallel groups comparing heparin-free dialysis with heparin-coated dialysis membrane (Evodial) versus standard care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Patrick Rossignol; Marc Dorval; Renaud Fay; Joan Fort Ros; Nathalie Loughraieb; Frédérique Moureau; Maurice Laville
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene (MCP-1-2518 A/G) polymorphism and serological markers of hepatitis B virus infection in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Alicja E Grzegorzewska; Dominik Pajzderski; Anna Sowińska; Paweł P Jagodziński
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-06-30

7.  Randomised trial on clinical performances and biocompatibility of four high-flux hemodialyzers in two mode treatments: hemodialysis vs post dilution hemodiafiltration.

Authors:  Marion Morena; Caroline Creput; Mouloud Bouzernidj; Annie Rodriguez; Lotfi Chalabi; Bruno Seigneuric; Céline Lauret; Anne-Sophie Bargnoux; Anne-Marie Dupuy; Jean-Paul Cristol
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.