Literature DB >> 20954858

A comparison of chromosome repair kinetics in G(0) and G(1) reveals that enhanced repair fidelity under noncycling conditions accounts for increased potentially lethal damage repair.

Cuihua Liu1, Tetsuya Kawata, Naoyuki Shigematsu, Francis Cucinotta, Kerry George, Masayoshi Saito, Takashi Uno, Kouichi Isobe, Hisao Ito.   

Abstract

Potentially lethal damage (PLD) and its repair were studied in confluent human fibroblasts by analyzing the kinetics of chromosome break rejoining and misrejoining in irradiated cells that were either held in noncycling G(0) phase or allowed to enter G(1) phase of the cell cycle immediately after 6 Gy irradiation. Virally mediated premature chromosome condensation (PCC) methods were combined with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to study chromosomal aberrations in interphase. Flow cytometry revealed that the vast majority of cells had not yet entered S phase 15 h after release from G(0). By this time some 95% of initially produced prematurely condensed chromosome breaks had rejoined, indicating that most repair processes occurred during G(1). The rejoining kinetics of prematurely condensed chromosome breaks was similar for each culture condition. However, under noncycling conditions misrepair peaked at 0.55 exchanges per cell, while under cycling conditions (G(1)) it peaked at 1.1 exchanges per cell. At 12 h postirradiation, complex-type exchanges were sevenfold more abundant for cycling cells (G(1)) than for noncycling cells (G(0)). Since most repair in G(0)/G(1) occurs via the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) process, increased PLD repair may result from improved cell cycle-specific rejoining fidelity of the NHEJ pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20954858     DOI: 10.1667/RR2159.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  6 in total

1.  Participation of gap junction communication in potentially lethal damage repair and DNA damage in human fibroblasts exposed to low- or high-LET radiation.

Authors:  Narongchai Autsavapromporn; Masao Suzuki; Ianik Plante; Cuihua Liu; Yukio Uchihori; Tom K Hei; Edouard I Azzam; Takeshi Murakami
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Radiosensitivity of quiescent and proliferating cells grown as multicellular tumor spheroids.

Authors:  Yusuke Onozato; Atsushi Kaida; Hiroyuki Harada; Masahiko Miura
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2017-04-16       Impact factor: 6.716

3.  A Mechanistic DNA Repair and Survival Model (Medras): Applications to Intrinsic Radiosensitivity, Relative Biological Effectiveness and Dose-Rate.

Authors:  Stephen Joseph McMahon; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Effects of shielding on the induction of 53BP1 foci and micronuclei after Fe ion exposures.

Authors:  Wentao Hu; Hailong Pei; He Li; Nan Ding; Jinpeng He; Jufang Wang; Yoshiya Furusawa; Ryoichi Hirayama; Yoshitaka Matsumoto; Cuihua Liu; Yinghui Li; Tetsuya Kawata; Guangming Zhou
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Comparison of the repair of potentially lethal damage after low- and high-LET radiation exposure, assessed from the kinetics and fidelity of chromosome rejoining in normal human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Cuihua Liu; Tetsuya Kawata; Guangming Zhou; Yoshiya Furusawa; Ryuichi Kota; Atsuhiro Kumabe; Shinya Sutani; Junichi Fukada; Masayo Mishima; Naoyuki Shigematsu; Kerry George; Francis Cucinotta
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  Mechanistic Modelling of DNA Repair and Cellular Survival Following Radiation-Induced DNA Damage.

Authors:  Stephen J McMahon; Jan Schuemann; Harald Paganetti; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.