Literature DB >> 23867854

Participation of gap junction communication in potentially lethal damage repair and DNA damage in human fibroblasts exposed to low- or high-LET radiation.

Narongchai Autsavapromporn1, Masao Suzuki, Ianik Plante, Cuihua Liu, Yukio Uchihori, Tom K Hei, Edouard I Azzam, Takeshi Murakami.   

Abstract

Existing research has not fully explained how different types of ionizing radiation (IR) modulate the responses of cell populations or tissues. In our previous work, we showed that gap junction intercellular communication (GJIC) mediates the propagation of stressful effects among irradiated cells exposed to high linear energy transfer (LET) radiations, in which almost every cells is traversed by an IR track. In the present study, we conducted an in-depth study of the role of GJIC in modulating the repair of potentially lethal damage (PLDR) and micronuclei formation in cells exposed to low- or high-LET IR. Confluent human fibroblasts were exposed in the presence or absence of a gap junction inhibitor to 200kV X rays (LET∼1.7keV/μm), carbon ions (LET∼76keV/μm), silicon ions (LET∼113keV/μm) or iron ions (LET∼400keV/μm) that resulted in isosurvival levels. The fibroblasts were incubated for various times at 37°C. As expected, high-LET IR were more effective than were low-LET X rays at killing cells and damaging DNA shortly after irradiation. However, when cells were held in a confluent state for several hours, PLDR associated with a reduction in DNA damage, occurred only in cells exposed to X rays. Interestingly, inhibition of GJIC eliminated the enhancement of toxic effects, which resulted in an increase of cell survival and reduction in the level of micronucleus formation in cells exposed to high, but not in those exposed to low-LET IR. The experiment shows that gap-junction communication plays an important role in the propagation of stressful effects among irradiated cells exposed to high-LET IR while GJIC has only a minimal effect on PLDR and DNA damage following low-LET irradiation. Together, our results show that PLDR and induction of DNA damage clearly depend on gap-junction communication and radiation quality.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gap junction intercellular communication; Heavy-ion beams; Ionizing radiation; Linear energy transfer; Potentially lethal damage repair

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23867854      PMCID: PMC4001089          DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  37 in total

1.  Repair of potentially lethal damage in Chinese hamster cells after X and alpha irradiation.

Authors:  M R Raju; J P Frank; E Bain; T T Trujillo; R A Tobey
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Repair of potentially lethal damage in x-irradiated HeLa cells.

Authors:  R A Phillips; L J Tolmach
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Factors influencing the repair of potentially lethal radiation damage in growth-inhibited human cells.

Authors:  J B Little
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Repair of sub-lethal and potentially lethal radiation damage in plateau phase cultures of human cells.

Authors:  J B Little
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1969-11-22       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Measurement of micronuclei in lymphocytes.

Authors:  M Fenech; A A Morley
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1985 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Potentially lethal damage repair (PLDR) in X-irradiated cultures of a normal human diploid fibroblast cell strain.

Authors:  R R Weichselbaum; H R Withers; K Tomkinson; J Little
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med       Date:  1983-03

Review 7.  Repair processes in radiation biology.

Authors:  M M Elkind
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Cell-cycle-dependent recovery from heavy-ion damage in G1-phase cells.

Authors:  E A Blakely; P Y Chang; L Lommel
Journal:  Radiat Res Suppl       Date:  1985

9.  Mutation and inactivation of cultured mammalian cells exposed to beams of accelerated heavy ions. IV. Biophysical interpretation.

Authors:  D T Goodhead; R J Munson; J Thacker; R Cox
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med       Date:  1980-02

10.  Cell-interdependent cisplatin killing by Ku/DNA-dependent protein kinase signaling transduced through gap junctions.

Authors:  Ryan Jensen; Peter M Glazer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

1.  DNA repair pathway choice at various conditions immediately post irradiation.

Authors:  Min Liu; Hongyan Wang; Solah Lee; Bailong Liu; Lihua Dong; Ya Wang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.694

2.  Cell cycle delay in murine pre-osteoblasts is more pronounced after exposure to high-LET compared to low-LET radiation.

Authors:  Yueyuan Hu; Christine E Hellweg; Christa Baumstark-Khan; Günther Reitz; Patrick Lau
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Model assembly for estimating cell surviving fraction for both targeted and nontargeted effects based on microdosimetric probability densities.

Authors:  Tatsuhiko Sato; Nobuyuki Hamada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Higher Initial DNA Damage and Persistent Cell Cycle Arrest after Carbon Ion Irradiation Compared to X-irradiation in Prostate and Colon Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Annelies Suetens; Katrien Konings; Marjan Moreels; Roel Quintens; Mieke Verslegers; Els Soors; Kevin Tabury; Vincent Grégoire; Sarah Baatout
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.