Literature DB >> 20954688

Noise in wavefront error measurement from pupil center location uncertainty.

Raymond A Applegate1, Jason D Marsack, Edwin J Sarver.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the impact of pupil center location uncertainty in wavefront sensing on the variance in repeated measures of higher order root-mean-square (RMS) wavefront error (WFE).
METHODS: Dilated WFE for one normal eye and one eye with keratoconus of two patients were measured using a custom Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor (lenslet spacing 400 μm). Twelve measurements for each patient were averaged to form the best estimate of each eye's WFE and standard deviation. The percentage of the standard deviation of the actual measurements attributable to the uncertainty in pupil center location was modeled by inducing random offsets in the pupil center up to 50, 100, 150, and 200 μm.
RESULTS: The percentage of standard deviation of the actual measurements accounted for by pupil location uncertainty form a complex interaction between magnitude and distribution of the higher order WFE with the magnitude of pupil centering error. The larger the WFE and pupil center uncertainty, the greater the effect.
CONCLUSIONS: As pupil center uncertainty increases, so does the WFE variation in repeated measurements. The larger the underlying WFE, the greater the impact on measurement variation. Increasing measurement variation decreases the ability to detect changes in WFE (eg, as a function of aging or clinical intervention) and decreases the accuracy with which wavefront-guided corrections can be made. Copyright 2010, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20954688      PMCID: PMC3040955          DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20100921-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  3 in total

1.  Pupil location under mesopic, photopic, and pharmacologically dilated conditions.

Authors:  Yabo Yang; Keith Thompson; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Direct transformation of Zernike eye aberration coefficients between scaled, rotated, and/or displaced pupils.

Authors:  Salvador Bará; Justo Arines; Jorge Ares; Paula Prado
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Detecting significant change in wavefront error: how long does it take?

Authors:  Darren E Koenig; Raymond A Applegate; Jason D Marsack; Edwin J Sarver; Lan Chi Nguyen
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.742

  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Influence of simple myopic against-the-rule and with-the-rule astigmatism on visual acuity in eyes with monofocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Toshiya Yamamoto; Takahiro Hiraoka; Simone Beheregaray; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Factors accounting for the 4-year change in acuity in patients between 50 and 80 years.

Authors:  Darren E Koenig; Lan Chi Nguyen; Katrina E Parker; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in keratoconus.

Authors:  Jason D Marsack; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Chi Nguyen; Anita Ticak; Darren E Koenig; James D Elswick; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Evaluation of anterior segment parameters and possible influencing factors in normal subjects using a dual Scheimpflug analyzer.

Authors:  Xiaogang Wang; Jing Dong; Qiang Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.