Beyond the dopamine receptor: novel therapeutic targets for treating schizophrenia.

All current drugs approved to treat schizophrenia appear to exert their antipsychotic effects through blocking the dopamine D2 receptor. Recent meta-analyses and comparative efficacy studies indicate marginal differences in efficacy of newer atypical antipsychotics and the older drugs, and little effects on negative and cognitive symptoms. This review integrates findings from postmortem, imaging, and drug-challenge studies to elucidate a corticolimbic "pathologic circuit" in schizophrenia that may be particularly relevant to the negative symptoms and cognitive impairments of schizophrenia. Potential sites for pharmacologic intervention targeting glutatatergic, GABAergic, and cholinergic neurotransmission to treat these symptoms of schizophrenia are discussed.

Limitations of antipsychotic medications in schizophrenia

To this day, the pharmacological management of schizophrenia is based upon the serendipitous discovery, over 50 years ago, of the antipsychotic effects of chlorpromazine.[1] Subsequent drug discovery for schizophrenia treatments was directed at identifying agents with comparable properties inferred by quite indirect criteria such as protection against apomorphine-induced canine vomiting or improvement in the conditioned avoidance response, while at the same time seeking increased potency and attenuated neurologic side effects.[2] Carlson[3] proposed that antipsychotic drugs produced their therapeutic effects by blocking dopamine receptors. Advances in ligand-binding techniques led Snyder and Seemen to demonstrate that there was a specific and highly robust correlation between the clinical potencies of antipsychotics and their ability to block the dopamine D2 receptor.[5-5] With the target of therapeutic action clearly identified, pharmacologists could then “build” into new agents other neurotransmitter receptor interactions to minimize side effects. However, these modifications, while virtually eliminating extrapyramidal side effects, introduced other serious problems including weight gain, hyperlipidosis, and glucose intolerance.[6]

The introduction of antipsychotic medications was associated with the progressive decline in the number of patients held in state mental hospitals. The vast majority of these suffered from psychotic disorders, and the inference was that the antipsychotic medications had a profound impact on their care, permitting this deinstitutionalization. A less sanguine view would note that currently half of the homeless suffer from serious mental illness,[7] and that the number of prison beds on a percapita basis has largely replaced the closed mental hospital beds, consistent with a shift in the locus of confinement.[8] So, in spite of the semblance of substantial improvements in treatment of schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders, schizophrenia, which affects approximately 1% of the population, remains the seventh most costly medical illness to society, and is still associated with a life-long disability for the vast majority of patients suffering from the disease.[9]

Results of recent clinical studies further raise concern over the modest advances that have been achieved over the last five decades in developing more effective drugs for treating schizophrenia. While meta-analyses comparing the first-generation antipsychotics to the secondgeneration antipsychotics do suggest some modest superiority of the second-generation antipsychotics, these effects are limited to positive symptoms known to be sensitive to D2 receptor antagonism.[10] In the large-scale CATIE (Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness) trial, Lieberman et al[11] compared several second-generation antipsychotics with a first-generation antipsychotic, perphenazine. The majority of patients in each group discontinued their antipsychotics owing to inefficacy or intolerable side effects. When clozapine was compared with other second-generation antipsychotics, it did exhibit modest but significant superiority over these other drugs. A separate study carried out in England, Cost Utility of the Latest Antipsychotic Drugs and Schizophrenia Study (CUtLASS 1), also found few differences in effectiveness between first-generation antipsychotics and second-generation antipsychotics in non-refractory patients.[12] As pointed out by Lieberman,[13] both the CATIE and the CUtLASS studies are “effectiveness” studies, which examine the therapeutic response in real-world clinical situations. This design is markedly different from the randomized clinical trial of “efficacy,” in which a new drug is compared with placebo in a very select group of patients subject to a myriad of exclusionary criteria. Thus, basing a drug discovery effort for schizophrenia on the assumption that it is primarily a disorder of dopaminergic dysfunction has led to the introduction of antipsychotics that are marginally more efficacious than their “progenitors,” chlorpromazine and haloperidol.

Starting about 20 years ago, psychopharmacologists began to focus on other components of schizophrenia rather than just the antipsychotic responsive positive symptoms (ie, hallucinations, delusion, and thought disorder). Negative symptoms including apathy, poverty of thought, anhedonia, lack of drive, disorganization, and social isolation were observed to covary independently of positive symptoms, be much more enduring, and correlate inversely with outcome.[14,15] With advances in neuropsychology, much more rigorous testing delineated the specific impairments in memory, problem-solving, and executive functions, which were noted a century ago with the designation of “dementia praecox.”[16,17] At the same time, progress in both structural and functional brain imaging revealed substantial cortical involvement in schizophrenia. On average, cortical volume is reduced and lateral ventricular volume is increased in individuals with a first episode of schizophrenia, and these differences increase over the next 5 to 10 years.[18,19] Functional imaging studies demonstrate impairments in the ability to perform tasks that engage the prefrontal cortex or the hippocampus, which corresponds with their inability to activate these areas.[20] Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has shown abnormalities in white-matter tracts of frontotemporal, frontoparietal, and temporooccipital connections,[21,22] providing further evidence for the presence of structural disconnectivity in schizophrenia. Finally, event-related potentials reveal disruption in cortical processing of sensory stimuli regardless of modality[22] Thus, the preponderance of evidence supports the notion that schizophrenia is a progressive disorder that diffusely affects the corticolimbic system.

The N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor and schizophrenia

Dissociative anesthetics such as ketamine and phencyclidine (PCP) have been known since their introduction a half-century ago to produce in adults a syndrome difficult to distinguish from schizophrenia.[23-24] While these drugs have complex interactions in the nervous system, Javitt and Zukin[25] noted that the psychotomimetic effects of PCP occurred at plasma concentrations that cause a noncompetitive, use-dependent antagonism of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors.[26] Ketamine infused in normal volunteers at doses that do not cause delirium/dementia produced the full range of signs and symptoms of schizophrenia, with positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and the selective cognitive deficits.[27,28] Subsequent studies showed that low-dose ketamine caused in normal volunteers the physiologic abnormalities associated with schizophrenia, including abnormal event-related potentials,[29] eye-tracking abnormalities[30] and enhanced subcortical dopamine release.[31] Individuals with stabilized schizophrenia exhibited marked sensitivity to ketamine with recurrence of individual specific symptoms.[32]

With a greater availability of brain tissue for histologic and neurochemical analyses, a number of findings have crystallized over the last 15 years as they have been confirmed in different laboratories using a variety of techniques including quantitative neurochemistry, immunocytochemistry, in situ hybridization, and DNA chip arrays. One of the first neurochemical abnormalities described in postmortem studies in schizophrenia was a reduction in the cortical activity of glutamate decarboxylase (GAD), the enzyme that synthesizes γ-amino butyric acid (GAB A), in the cortex.[33] More recent studies have revealed a much more selective effect primarily on the parvalbumin (PV+) -expressing, fast-firing GABAergic interneurons in the intermediate layers of the cortex and in subsectors of the hippocampus that provide recurrent inhibition to the pyramidal cells.[3435] Thus, the reduction in the expression of GAD67, PV, and the GABA transporter has been demonstrated in this neuronal population.[36] That the downregulation of these presynaptic markers reflects reduced activity of these GABAergic neurons is inferred by the compensatory upregulation of postsynaptic GABAA receptors and its a2-containing subunit.[37] Another recurrent finding from Golgi-stain studies and more recent immunocytochemistry of spinophilin, a protein enriched in dendritic spines, is the reduction in dendritic complexity and spine density on pyramidal neurons in several cortical regions, consistent with the overall cortical atrophy in schizophrenia.[38,39]

These core pathologic features of schizophrenia have been linked to NMDA receptor hypofunction. Several studies have demonstrated that subacute treatment of rats with dissociative anesthetics results in a downregulation of GAD67 and PV expression in the GABAergic neurons in the intermediate layers of the cortex and a consequent disinhibition of pyramidal neuronal firing.[4041] This disinhibition of the pyramidal neurons is consistent with the results of functional imaging studies in the hippocampus, as well as the elevated evoked subcortical dopamine release in normal individuals challenged with ketamine.[31] The paradoxically reduced firing of the PVGABAergic interneurons may be secondary to the decreased flux of calcium through their NMDA receptors, which causes a misperception of reduced excitatory drive.[42] NMDA receptors also play an important role in dendritic elaboration and spine development.[43] Mice that are homozygotes for a null mutation of serine racemase, the enzyme that synthesizes D-serine, exhibit marked reduction in NMDA receptor function.[44] Cortical pyramidal neurons of these serine racemase knockout mice have significantly reduced dendritic complexity and spine density, as compared with their wild-type littermates, with the pathology quite similar to that observed in schizophrenia.[45]

Schizophrenia is a disorder with a high degree of heritability, and recent genetic studies have provided support for a role for NMDA receptors in this disorder. Most of the evidence is derived from association studies, although that strategy has come under criticism by advocates of “unbiased” genome -wide association study (GWAS) strategy. Meta-analysis has strongly implicated the gene encoding D -amino acid oxidase (DAAO), which regulates the availability of D-serine, as well as G72, a gene encoding a protein that binds to and inhibits DAAO (for review, see ref 42). Meta-analysis has also pointed to NR2B, a component of the NMDA receptor, as a risk gene for schizophrenia.[46] Other risk genes include neuregulin 1, which among other actions directly modulates NMDA receptor activity,[47] and dysbindin, which is concentrated in glutamatergic terminals.[48] Integrating the postmortem, genetic, and animal modeling results has suggested a plausible pathologic circuit in schizophrenia (Figure 1) . Hypofunction of corticolimbic NMDA receptors on the fast-firing PV+-GABAergic interneurons in the intermediate layers of the cortex results in downregulation of GAD67 and PV expression, reduced inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs), and disinhibition of the postsynaptic pyramidal cells.[42] NMDA receptor hypofunction can be due to elevated endogenous inhibitors such as kynurenic acid or N-acetyl aspartyl glutamate (NAAG), reduced availability of the endogenous co-agonist D-serine, or heritable abnormalities in NR2B expression or function. Electrophysiological correlates include loss of gamma-band responses to sensory stimuli and elevated neuronal activity in the default mode.[49] Disinhibition of glutamatergic output from the ventral hippocampus would drive the firing of dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area and enhanced subcortical dopamine release, which in PET studies correlates with psychosis.[50] Thus, in this model, psychosis is a downstream event.

Schematic representation of the synaptic circuitry relevant to the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. NMDA receptor hypofunction can be produced by exogenous antagonists such as ketamine, endogenous antagonists such as N-acetyl aspartyl glutamate (NAAG) or kyneurenic acid, reduced availability of D-serine due to increased activity of D-amino acid oxidase (DAAO) or mutant NR2B. This results in dendritic dysplasia on pyramidal neurons and reduced activity of the parvalbumin positive GABAergic interneurons. Reduced recurrent inhibition disrupts cortical processing, causing cognitive impairment and negative symptoms and increased excitatory drive to the ventral tegmental area (VTA), leading to psychosis. An allelic variant of the gene encoding the α7 nicotinic receptor causes reduced expression and disrupts sensory gating. NMDA, N-methylD-aspartate; GABA, γ-aminobutyric acid; DA, dopamine; NBM, nucleus basalis of Meynert; nAchR, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; Glu, glutamate

Hypofunction of NMDA receptors could account for other aspects of the disorder. First, given the role of NMDA receptors in neuronal migration,[51] it could account for the finding of abnormal distribution of cortical GABAergic interneurons in some cases.[52] Secondly, persistent hypofunction of NMDA receptors is consistent with the reduced pyramidal neuron dendritic complexity, reduced spine density, and net compaction of the neuropil in schizophrenia.[37]

Obviously, the pathophysiology of schizophrenia is much more complex and nuanced than suggested by this simplified model. Indeed, a number of putative risk genes encode transcriptional factors that affect brain development.[53] Other risk genes encode products involved in myelination.[54] Furthermore, in recognition of the variation in symptoms among patients who satisfy the diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia and its complex genetics, where literally hundreds of genes of modest effect might be involved, the proposed “pathologic circuit” represents at best a crude first approximation of the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Nevertheless, it does yield a host of potential targets for therapeutic intervention, and many of these are under investigation by the pharmaceutical industry. It is these potential therapeutic targets related to this circuit that are the subject of this review (Figure 2). Of particular interest is the fact that these targets would intervene in the primary cortical pathology of schizophrenia and thus potentially treat the negative symptoms and cognitive deficits.

Potential pharmacologic interventions to treat schizophrenia: (i) Enhance NMDA receptor function by increasing synaptic glycine concentrations with an inhibitor of GlyT1 , administering exogenous D-serine, inhibiting D-amino acid oxidase or by treating with an mGluR5 agonist that augments NMDA receptor function; (ii) Increase the excitability of the parvalbumin-positive GABAergic interneurons with a c 7nicotine receptorpositive modulator; (iii) Reduce pyramidal neuron excitability with GABAA receptor-positive modulator. (iv) Decrease disinhibited pyramidal neuron glutamate release with an mGluR2/3 agonist. NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate; GABA, γ-aminobutyric acid; DA, dopamine; NBM, nucleus basalis of Meynert; mAchR, metabotrophic acetylcholine receptor; Glu, glutamate; DAAO, D-amino acid oxidase

Targeting the glutamatergic synapse

Structure and function of the NMDA receptor

The NMDA receptor, with its triple gate for activation, is a critical postsynaptic mediator of activity-dependent synaptic plasticity. Throughout most of the brain, the heterotetrameric receptor is composed of two NR1 subunits and two NR2 subunits, all of which contribute transmembrane domains to the pore of the ion channel. The NR1 subunit has eight different splice variants, which may affect channel function differently by associating with different intracellular signaling pathways.[55] NR2 subunits may be expressed in four different forms (NR2AD), and in some regions of the nervous system may be substituted by two different forms of NR3 subunits, each of which confer different biophysical and pharmacologic properties to the channel.[56] Mg2 occludes the ion channel at resting membrane potential. Hence, opening of the “voltage gate” by expelling Mg2+ with depolarization of the postsynaptic cell is one requirement for conductance through the channel. A second requirement is opening of the “ligand gate” by agonist binding at glutamate binding sites on the NR2 subunits. A third requirement is agonist binding at glycine modulatory sites (GMS, also the Glycine B receptor) on the NR1 channel-encoding subunit.[57] Endogenous polyamines also modulate NMDA receptors by potentiating the action of glutamate.[58] Dissociative anesthetics gain access to and bind within the NMDA receptor channel pore when the channel is open, and as such are both noncompetitive and usedependent antagonists.[59,60]

The key roles that the NMDA receptor is known to play in neurodevelopment and in activity-dependent plasticity make it all the more plausible as a contributor to the pathophysiology of schizophrenia, particularly deficits in cognitive function. Because it opens only when the postsynaptic neuron receives several simultaneous excitatory inputs to sufficiently depolarize it so as to relieve the Mg2+ blockade, the NMDA receptor functions as a molecular coincidence detector. The NMDA receptor ion channel is characterized by high Ca2+ permeability, and the influx of Ca2+ triggers a cascade of intracellular events that mediate local, acute synaptic plasticity as well as changes in gene expression that influence long-term neural plasticity and have trophic effects.[61,62] Whether or not symptoms of schizophrenia are caused in part by hypofunctional signaling through NMDA receptormediated pathways, enhancing NMDA receptor-mediated activity may improve cognition and neural plasticity, thereby reducing the debilitating negative and cognitive symptoms. On the other hand, a significant risk in pursuing NMDA receptor activation as a therapeutic pathway is that of excitotoxic damage to the brain, which can result from excessive activation of NMDA receptors.[63] With this caveat in mind, efforts to treat symptoms of schizophrenia through the NMDA receptor have focused on positive modulation of the receptor rather than increasing agonist binding at the glutamate site.

The glycine modulatory site

The GMS of the NMDA receptor is a potentially rich target for therapeutics. Despite the presence of endogenous high potency agonists glycine and D-serine,[64,65] the GMS is not saturated in vivo,[66,67] supporting the idea that administration of GMS agonists could benefit patients by enhancing activation of NMDA receptors. Furthermore, evidence of reduced cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum D-serine levels in schizophrenic patients[68,69] as well as evidence of elevated levels of the endogenous GMS antagonist kynurenate in postmortem brain and CSF[70,71] suggest that the GMS occupancy is downshifted or shifted toward antagonism in the disease state.

There have been more than 80 clinical trials of agents that increase agonist occupancy of the GMS in schizophrenia, including D-serine, glycine, D-cycloserine, Dalanine, and sarcosine. Several of these studies have reported significant improvements over multiple symptom domains while others have not. Aside from intrinsic differences in efficacy between candidate GMS regulators, methodological factors likely contribute to the variability in results among these trials, most notably small sample sizes, variability in concomitant typical and atypical antipsychotic use, and subject compliance. Also, important to consider from the point of view of evaluating the promise of the GMS strategy, the majority of these trials have been conducted using glycine and/or the partial GMS agonist D-cycloserine, which are not the most potent agonist of the site. Studies employing cloned NMDA receptors expressed in a Xenopus oocyte system suggest the potency of D-serine is about three times that of glycine,[72] and D-cycloserine is a partial agonist with only about half the efficacy of glycine at the GMS.[73] Still, glycine and D-cycloserine have been more widely tested than D-serine due to historical approval of these agents for human use, glycine as a nonessential amino acid, and D-cycloserine as a second-line antibiotic effective against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

A recent meta-analysis of strategies to enhance NMDA receptor-mediated neurotransmission in schizophrenia reported the striking finding that NMDA-enhancing molecules as a whole exerted statistically significant effects on total psychopathology, depressive symptoms, negative symptoms, cognitive symptoms, positive symptoms, and general psychopathology in descending order of effect size.[74] The meta-analysis included results from 26 double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials in which the treatment lasted at least 4 weeks. Agents tested were glycine, D-cycloserine, D-serine, sarcosine, and D-alanine. Pooling of data from different studies was made possible by including only those for which enough data were available to calculate a standardized metric of the degree of improvement seen in a particular symptom domain relative to placebo, or the effect size (ES). There was some heterogeneity in the trials that were included, in that patients enrolled were administered concomitant typical or atypical antipsychotics and in others were not. Also, trials of chronic stable and acutely exacerbated schizophrenia were included. When the effects of different molecules were assessed separately, glycine was found to have significant effects on total psychopathology, positive symptoms, and depressive symptoms. D-serine was found effective on total psychopathology, negative symptoms, and cognitive symptoms. Sarcosine, an endogenous inhibitor of the glycine transporter, was effective on total psychopathology, negative symptoms, and general psychopathology. D-cylcoserine was not effective on any domain of schizophrenia symptoms. However, if the trials that use clozapine as the antipsychotic are excluded, the duration of exposure restricted and compliance controlled the data suggest that D-cycloserine significantly reduces negative symptoms.[63]

The findings of the meta-analysis by Tsai and Lin[74] provide some interesting new illumination for the results of the largest individual study to date of glycine and Dcycloserine, a multicenter trial called the Cognitive and Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia Trial (CONSIST). The CONSIST study found no statistically significant effects of either glycine or D-cyloserine on negative symptoms or cognitive performance in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Previous smaller studies of high doses of glycine administered concurrently with typical and atypical antipsychotics had reported improvements negative and cognitive symptoms.[75-77] High doses were purported to be required to achieve sufficiently high serum glycine levels for clinical efficacy, and difficulty with compliance was noted. The CONSIST study did report a significant effect of site (P<0.01), as well as lower serum levels of glycine than was achieved in previous studies. Thus, one of the concerns raised about the interpretation of this study with respect to its results with glycine was that variability in patient compliance between inpatient and outpatient clinics could account for the negative result. Indeed, restricting the results to those obtained with inpatients, for whom compliance was not in question, both glycine and D-cycloserine significantly (P<0.03) reduced negative symptoms. However, the results of the meta-analysis, which includes the CONSIST study, showed that when double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with glycine were considered together, glycine still had no significant effect on negative symptoms, but rather was effective on positive and depressive symptoms, which were not assessed by the CONSIST. Nonetheless, as serum levels of glycine were not part of the meta-analysis, the lack of any significant dose-response with glycine on negative symptoms, positive symptoms, or total psychopathology is still open to the question of whether compliance is a major issue in evaluating outcomes. Despite the negative findings of glycine efficacy with respect to negative and cognitive symptoms, the issues of compliance and serum levels may still be highly relevant to schizophrenia therapy, given the significant effects of glycine on positive and depressive symptoms, particularly for patients who do not respond to antipsychotics or are experiencing adverse side effects of clozapine.

Consistent with its action as a partial agonist, an initial dose-finding study with D-cycloserine added on to conventional neuroleptics reported a U-shaped doseresponse curve with an intermediate dose that improved negative as well as cognitive symptoms.[78] Given that the GMS is not saturated in vivo, one might speculate that a partial agonist would augment the activity of the NMDA receptor up to a point and then actually begin to compete with the endogenous agonist. Furthermore, this point of inflection in the nature of the D-cylcoserine effect may vary depending on the individual patient's level of GMS saturation. D-cylcoserine may in any case be an impractical approach for prolonged treatment, as NMDA receptor desensitization has been observed with chronic administration.[79] The apparent lack of consistent success of D-cycloserine use in schizophrenia stands in contrast to the positive results observed with it in extinction therapy for specific phobias. The extinction of a conditioned fear memory is an NMDA-dependent process,[80] which can be enhanced by positive modulation of the GMS.[81,82] D-cycloserine has been effective in treating acrophobia in combination of a virtual reality-based cognitive behavioral therapy[83,84] Thus, a key difference between the successful application of D-cycloserine in anxiety disorders and the unsuccessful application in schizophrenia may be that the in the former it is used acutely or subchronically as an adjunct to concomitant activation of specific brain circuitry related to specific fear or phobia.

D-serine itself is a potential therapy, as it has been shown in rodents to be relatively efficient at crossing the blood-brain barrier upon peripheral administration compared to glycine,[85] and can persist in cortex thereafter.[86] In contrast to other GMS agonists, there is direct indication that D-serine is affected in schizophrenia, as it is decreased in CSF[69] and serum from patients.[68] The significant effects of D-serine on total psychopathology, negative symptoms, and cognitive symptoms found in the Tsai and Lin[74] meta-analysis are based only on small trials that tested it as an add-on therapy to typical or atypical antipsychotics. In the case of D-serine as well as other agents, testing in conjunction with typical or atypical antipsychotics may occlude potential effects on positive symptoms, which are relatively well controlled with available antipsychotics. Large Phase II trials of D-serine in schizophrenia and schizophrenia prodrome are currently underway, both as an add-on to antipsychotics and as a monotherapy.

An intriguing pattern in the literature on GMS agonists, corroborated by the meta-analysis, is that they are ineffective when combined with clozapine as opposed to other antipsychotics. These results together could be explained by an effect of clozapine on GMS occupancy[75] The mechanism of putative clozapine interaction with NMDA receptors is not yet known, but increased NMDA-mediated currents have been observed in the presence of clozapine in rat frontal cortex,[87] and effects on glycine transport have been proposed.[88] If clozapine, which is superior to other atypical antipsychotics in treating negative and cognitive symptoms,[10] works through the GMS, it may be possible to achieve comparable benefits without the troubling side effects of clozapine such as agranulocytosis, weight gain, and metabolic syndrome by using other agents that enhance GMS occupancy.

D-amino acid oxidase

The peroxisomal enzyme D-amino acid oxidase (DAAO) converts D-serine to hydroxy-pyruvate in the brain, yielding hydrogen peroxide as a by-product.[89] DAAO expression was originally believed to be restricted to astrocytes in the mammalian cerebellum,[90] but has since been observed in neurons.[91] Inhibitors of DAAO would be expected to increase D-serine in the brain, and could thereby increase GMS occupancy. Direct evidence of involvement of DAAO in schizophrenia is somewhat controversial. DAAO has been implicated as a putative schizophrenia gene by linkage and association methods, but meta-analyses have revealed that the disease-associated variants of the gene are different across studies,[92,93]precluding a simple functional hypothesis based on the findings. Postmortem studies of brain DAAO expression in schizophrenia have reported elevated transcript levels and enzyme activity.[69,94-96] G72, a mysterious putative interacting protein of DAAO, is coded for in a linkage region identified for schizophrenia by multiple studies, and considered one of the strongest genetic risk factors for schizophrenia identified using linkage analysis. The link between G72 and DAAO originates from a yeast 2-hybrid study from which DAAO emerged as a G72 inter-actor.[97] An in vitro functional assay suggested that G72 protein is an activator of DAAO; but more recent studies demonstrate that it inhibits DAAO. According to this conceptualization, mutations in G72 would result in disinhibition of DAAO, thereby reducing the availability of D-serine. However, despite significant attention paid to it pursuant to its repeated appearance in the schizophrenia genetic literature, to date the protein has been observed only in heterologous expression systems. It should be noted that DAAO activity is not specific to D-serine, so manipulating the activity of this enzyme can affect the levels of other D-amino acids.

Several pharmaceutical companies have established DAAO inhibitor programs. While there are no published clinical data, preclinical studies have revealed promising behavioral effects. Adage et al[98] reported that DAAO inhibitor, AS057278, significantly increased cortical Dserine, corrected PCP induced prepulse inhibition (PPI) deficits and normalized PCP-induced hyperactivity, a behavioral surrogate for psychosis. Hashimoto et al[99] found that combining D-serine with the DAAO inhibitor, 5-chloro-benzo[d]isoxazol-3-ol (CBIO), markedly increased cortical D-serine levels and corrected dizocilpine-induced (MK801) PPI deficits. However, another DAAO inhibitor, in spite of elevating CSF D-serine levels, failed to normalize amphetamineinduced hyperactivity and MK801-induced disruption of cognition. As D-serine treatment was effective, it appears that DAAO inhibition must be greater than 80%, the upper limit achieved by their drug.[100]

D-Serine synthesis and transport

D-serine, the highest-affinity endogenous GMS agonist, is synthesized from L-serine by the pyridoxal 5'-dependent enzyme serine racemase. Polymorphisms in the 5' untranslated region of the serine racemase gene, which may be functionally related to levels of its promoter activity, have been associated with schizophrenia.[101-103] Like DAAO, serine racemase was originally believed to be restricted to astrocytes in its localization[104] but has since been observed in neurons.[105,106] Genetic knockout of serine racemase leads to a reduction of 80% to 90% in brain D-serine in mice.[107] The origin of the remaining 10% to 20% is unknown but may be diet and/or bacterial flora. D-serine levels within the synapse are regulated by the arginine-serine-cysteine transporter, ASC-1,[108] which is localized to neuronal somata and dendrites.[109,110] Inhibitors of ASC-1 have been proposed as therapeutics in schizophrenia,[111] as they would presumably elevate levels of extracellular brain D-serine. On a cautionary note, constitutive ACS-1 gene deletion in mice has been shown to cause tremors, seizures, and early postnatal death.[112]

GlyT1 inhibitors

The concentration of glycine in mammalian CSF is high relative to its dissociation constant (Kd) for the GMS, but local glycine levels are functionally regulated at the synapse by the sodium-dependent glycine transporter-1 (GlyT1) expressed in astrocytes.[113,114] The activity of GlyT1 is itself endogenously regulated by sarcosine (Nmethylglycine), an intermediate and byproduct in glycine synthesis and degradation. Electrophysiological studies in rodents suggest that inhibition of GlyT1 is more effective than exogenous application of glycine at potentiating NMDA receptor-mediated neurotransmission. For example, in an acute hippocampal slice preparation, NMDA receptor-mediated excitatory postsynaptic potentitals (EPSPs) in CA1 hippocampal pyramidal neurons were potentiated robustly by the sarcosine analog N[3-(4'-fluorophenyl)-3-(4'-phenylphenoxy)-propyl] sarcosine (NFPS), whereas perfusion with high concentrations of glycine (1 or 10 µM) had relatively little effect.[67] Similar findings have been reported in acute frontal cortical slices.[115] Systemic treatment with NFPS increased NMDA receptor currents and LTP in the dentate gyrus and enhanced prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response.[116]

Sarcosine administered to patients in conjunction with antipsychotics has shown some promise for treatment of schizophrenia. A meta-analysis of clinical trials testing the efficacy of GMS-enhancing agents found it effective on total psychopathology, negative symptoms, and general psychopathology.[74] However, undesirable side effects of sarcosine-derived GlyT1 inhibitors have also been noted, including ataxia, hypoactivity, and decreased respiration, prompting the development of novel classes of non-sarcosine-based inhibitors of GlyT1.[117] Several GlyT1 inhibitors are in the early stages of clinical trials; and Hoffman-LaRoche has reported that their GlyT1 inhibitor caused significant reductions in overall symptoms and especially negative symptoms in a Phase-II clinical trial in schizophrenia.

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) as therapeutic targets

Characteristics of mGluRs

While ionotropic glutamate (iGlu) receptors (AMPA, kainate and NMDA subtypes) serve as the mediators of excitatory (glutamatergic) signaling, G-protein coupled metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors act as modulators of excitatory signaling. Given the increased interest in the pathophysiological impact of dysfunctional glutamate signaling and their role as modulatory receptors, mGluRs have become a major target for the development of therapeutics for schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders.[118-121] The mGluRs are members of Class C of the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily. Eight subtypes of mGluRs have been identified and divided into three groups, based upon pharmacology, sequence homology, and G protein coupling: Group I (mGlu1 and mGlu5), Group II (mGluR2 and mGluR3), and Group III (mGluR4, mGluR6, mGluR7, and mGluR8) (for review, see ref 122). Each of these receptors possesses a distinct expression pattern that relates to physiological control over glutamatergic neurotransmission at various levels including neurotransmitter release, function of postsynaptic iGluRs, glial function, and neuroplastic changes in postsynaptic neurons. These discrete functions make these receptors very attractive targets for pharmacological intervention. Group I and II receptors have notably risen in interest as potential treatments for schizophrenia because of their ability to normalize dysfunctional glutamatergic neurotransmission thought to be a core feature of the disorder.

Group II mGluRs

Group II mGluRs are promising therapeutic targets because of their role as autoreceptors in the regulation of glutamate release from nerve terminals. Activation of Gai/o-coupled mGlu2/3 receptors attenuate electrically evoked excitatory neurotransmission.[123] Pharmacologically evoked and spontaneous excitatory currents are attenuated by mGluR2/3 activation, with effects predominantly on the frequency of currents, supporting a presynpatic mode of activity[124,125] Preclinical observations have been made that psychotomimetic drugs that act as noncompetitive blockers of NMDA receptors (eg, PCP, ketamine, MK801) cause an increase in synaptic glutamate levels in the prefrontal cortex (PFC).[126,127] As reviewed above, the deficient PV+-GABAergic neuron function found in postmortem studies in schizophrenia has led to the hypothesis that the pathophysiology of schizophrenia involves a disinhibition of cortical glutamatergic neurons and that group II mGluR-mediated reduction in glutamate release account for their antipsychotic action.[128-130] The development of ligands selective for mGlu2/3 receptors has allowed for the examination of this hypothesis in preclinical models of schizophrenia.

(1R,4R,5S,6R)-4-Amino-2-oxabicyclo[3.1.0]hexane4,6-dicarboxylic acid (LY379268) and (1S,2S,5R,6S)-2-Aminobicyclo[3.1.0]hexane-2,6-dicarboxylic acid) LY354740 are highly selective agonists of mGlu2/3 receptors possessing >100-fold selectivity over other subtypes of mGluRs.[131] These ligands have been shown to reverse the behavioral disruptive effects of the psy-chotomimetic PCP in numerous paradigms including stereotypy and hyperactivity,[126,132-136] social interactions and cognition.[137,138] These ligands also display apparent antipsychotic efficacy by inhibiting the behavioral effects of psychedelic hallucinogens that influence glutamater-gic signaling via serotonin 2A receptors,[139] an effect linked to the inhibition of glutamate release from nerve terminals.[124] A structurally related compound, (-)-(1R, 4S,5S,6S)-4-amino-2-sulfonylbicyclo[3.1.0]hexane-4,6-dicarboxylic (LY404039), administered via a prodrug form, exhibited promising efficacy in a Phase II clinical trial, reversing positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenic patients as a standalone therapy.[140] This therapeutic efficacy was similar to that of olanzapine and was achieved without any of the side effects of commonly prescribed antipsychotics such as elevated prolactin, weight gain, and extrapyramidal symptoms. The achievement of this clinical trial is twofold; it: (i) provides proof of concept for the development and application of glu-tamatergic based therapeutics and (ii) demonstrates the predictive validity of the PCP/ketamine model of schizophrenia. This second point was initially supported by research demonstrating that the cognitive-disruptive effects of ketamine in humans were indeed attenuated by an mGlu2/3 receptor agonist.[141]

The work with mGluR2/3 receptor agonists also highlights another key mechanistic point about potential schizophrenic therapies: they need not reverse hyper-dopaminergic neurotransmission. All current therapies block D2 receptors to some degree, which has been assumed to be necessary for therapeutic efficacy. The work of Moghaddam and Adams[127,138] illustrates that the major element of psychotomimetic drug (PCP or ketamine) action is to stimulate glutamatergic neurotransmission (paradoxical to the action of these drugs as NMDA receptor blockers), with dopamine release coincidental. Notably, mGluR2/3 agonists achieve behavioral effects that are paralleled by inhibition of drug-induced glutamate efflux without affecting drug-induced increases in extracellular dopamine levels measured by in vivo microdialysis.[126] Single-unit recordings in awake rats are further illustrative; mGluR2/3 receptor agonists reversed NDMA receptor blocker-induced disinhibition and dysregulation of prefrontal pyramidal neuron firing.[142] The results of these studies suggest that antipsychotic efficacy can be achieved in the absence of a direct effect on forebrain dopamine, an effect alluded to in earlier research showing a temporal disconnect between the behavioral effects of PCP and modulation of DA, but not glutamate, brain levels.[126]

Positive allosteric modulation of mGlu2 receptors

Efforts to refine the mGlu2/3 agonists have focused upon finding a ligand that selectively activates mGlu2 receptors. Discriminating between mGluR2 and mGluR3 subtypes has been difficult, as they share >90% sequence homology. Expression studies suggest mGluR2 are predominately localized to presynaptic sites,[143] while mGluR3 are localized more postsynaptically and in glial cells.[144] Using mGluR2-deficient mice, the apparent antipsychotic effects of mGluR2/3 agonists have been attributed to mGluR2 activation.[145,146] These studies demonstrate the potential for selective activiation of mGluR2; however, efforts to develop agonists of the glutamate-binding (orthosteric) site have not surprisingly fallen short. Recently, greater efforts have been undertaken to pursue ligands that activate the receptor through sites other than agonist binding site, termed allosteric sites. The success of these efforts illustrate that while the orthosteric site is highly conserved between the two receptors, allosteric sites are located in less conserved regions of the receptor and can be selectively targeted to modulate agonist-induced signaling.[147]

Allosteric modulators can be either positive or negative in direction of activity, causing an increase or decrease, respectively, in the activity of orthosteric ligand induced signaling by altering agonist affinity and/or efficacy of G-protein coupling.[148] In the case of mGlu2 receptors, efforts have been directed towards identifying positive allosteric modulators (PAMs). To date, numerous PAMs haven been identified and shown to possess selective efficacy to enhance agonist activity at mGlu2 receptors with dramatic selectivity over other targets.[135,149,150] These ligands increase the ability of endogenous glutamate and exogenous agonists to reduce evoked excitatory postsynaptic potentials in brain slice preparations.[135,139,149,151] Behavioral studies show that mGlu2 receptor PAMs possess efficacy similar to that of mGluR2/3 agonists, reducing PCP induced locomotion,[134,135] decreasing fearpotentiated startle[150,151] and diminishing hallucinogen-induced stereotypies.[139] Interestingly, one study showed that one PAM, biphenyl-idanone A (BINA), was capable of uniquely reducing PCP-induced deficits in PPI. These studies demonstrate the validity and therapeutic potential of selectively targeting mGluR2. While issues of in vivo potency remain for currently available ligands, PAMs possess potential benefits. The selective potentiation of endogenous signaling would work to enhance the activity-dependent neurotransmission, while avoiding the potentially deleterious effects of persistent receptor activation, notably desensitization and tolerance.[135]

Cystine-glutamate exchanger

Discussion of mGluR2 activation has focused on the development of ligands that directly target these receptors with either direct agonists or PAMs that require endogenous glutamate for activity. An additional way to enhance activity at these receptors is through the modulation of extrasynaptic glutamate levels. The cystineglutamate exchanger maintains 60% of the extra-synaptic glutamate concentration.[152] The exchanger is located on the glial cell membrane and releases glutamate in a 1:1 ratio with the import of cystine.[153] Activation of this exchanger produces a reduction in excitatory neurotransmission by mGluR2/3-dependent mechanism.[154] The compound N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a substrate for this exchanger that substitutes for cystine. The work of Kalivas and colleagues has done much to demonstrate the behavioral effects of NAC in a preclinical model of drug-seeking behavior used to understand addiction. In these studies, NAC reduces drug-seeking behaviors and reinstatement of drug consumption after extinction[152155] in a manner that is similar to the effects of an mGluR2/3 agonist.[156] More germane to the current review, recent work has demonstrated the ability of NAC to reverse PCP-induced deficits in cognition and social interactions, as well as PCP-induced activation of glutamate release in the prefrontal cortex of rodents.[157]

These findings provide an additional context for the interpretation of results of a recent clinical trial with NAC (or placebo control) given as an adjunct therapy to schizophrenic patients.[158] The investigators saw a significant improvement over placebo in Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) negative scale and overall Clinical Global Impression (CGI-S) after 24 weeks of treatment. General functioning (Scale of Global Assessment of Functioning) improved within a comparison of NAC-treated patients, but not as a comparison to placebo treatment (NB, within-group comparison of placebo treatment was not significant). The investigators undertook this clinical trial to test the effect of restoring glutathione deficiency in schizophrenia as a treatment. Cystine and correspondingly NAC are precursors to the production of glutathione, a molecule necessary for the protection against the effects of reactive oxygen species.[153] Is the physiological effect of NAC treatment prevention of oxidative damage or a restoration of glutamatergic tone on presynaptic mGluR2/3? In spite of preclinical studies demonstrating that mGluR2/3 antagonists block the effects of NAC, further studies need to be done to clarify this point. Perhaps the beneficial effects of NAC are twofold at the molecular level. Given the sensitivity of NMDA receptor function to redox state,[159,160] this might be an ideal way to use a single therapy to target NMDA receptor hypofunction and oxidative stress.

Activation of mGlu5 receptors

While development of ligands targeting group II mGluRs is focused on reversing excessive, dysfunctional glutamate release downstream of cortical disinhibition, mGluR5 selective activators are sought to directly reverse NMDA receptor hypofunction though enhancement of the ionotropic receptor activity. A functional link is formed between Gaq -coupled postsynaptic mGlu5 receptors and NMDA receptors by the scaffolding protein Homer and Shank interacting with the postsynaptic density[161] NMDA receptor signaling in hippocampal slices is selectively potentiated by the mGlu5 agonist (RS)-2-Chloro5-hydroxyphenylglycine (CHPG).162163The specificity for mGluR5 versus mGluR1, of this effect on NMDA receptor currents is further demonstrated by the absence of potentiated signaling in the presence of mGluR5 (but not mGluR1) antagonists.[163,164]

Available mGluR5 agonists suffer from poor brain penetration. As a result, much of the in vivo preclinical work demonstrating the role of mGlu5 receptors was done using the centrally active mGluR5-selective antagonist 2-Methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)pyridine hydrochloride (MPEP). MPEP potentiates the locomotor hyperactivity[165-167] and PPI disruption[165-167] caused by either PCP or MK801. These effects were seen without any effect on activity or PPI in the absence of PCP/MK801. MPEP also enhances the detrimental effects of PCP/

MK801 in cognitive tasks of working memory and instrumental learning.[167,168] In vivo single-unit recordings show that MPEP enhances the MK801-induced increase in neuronal activity, thereby linking the behavioral findings back to the electrophysiology.[169]

Like the Group II mGluRs, recent research demonstrates that the most effective strategy to selectively activate mGlu5 versus mGlu1 may be through the use of PAMs. Two unique PAMs, 3-Cyano-N-(1,3-diphenyl1H-pyrazol-5-yl)benzamide (CDPPB) and (S)-(4fluorophenyl)-(3-[3-(4-fluoro-phenyl)-[1,2,4]-oxadiazol5-yl]piperidin-1-yl)methanone (ADX47273), have been developed and shown to display dramatic mGluR5-selectivity and the ability to increase the efficacy of glutamate to activate mGlu5-mediated potentiation of NMDA receptor signaling.[166,170] Furthermore, the PAMs are systemically active and display antipsychotic-like properties, blocking amphetamine-induced hyperactivity,[166,170,1,2,4]-oxadiazol-5-yl]-piperidin-1-yl}methanone]: a novel metabotropic glutamate receptor 5-selective positive allosteric modulator with preclinical antipsychotic-like and procognitive activities. . J Pharmacol Exp Ther.. 2008 ">171] PCPinduced hyperactivity,[170] and amphetamine/apomorphineinduced disruption of PPI.[166,1,2,4]-oxadiazol-5-yl]-piperidin-1-yl}methanone]: a novel metabotropic glutamate receptor 5-selective positive allosteric modulator with preclinical antipsychotic-like and procognitive activities. . J Pharmacol Exp Ther.. 2008 ">171] In the 5-choice serial reaction time task, ADX47273 reduced impulsive errors.[170] Taken together these results demonstrate the potential antipsychotic-like ability of mGlu5 receptor PAMs to reduce the behavioral effects of multiple classes of psychotomimetics as well as produce procognitive effects. The efficacy in models of disrupted PPI is a divergence from that of mGluR2/3 agonists and suggests that these two approaches might have distinct therapeutic profiles. The limited preclinical testing and absence of any clinical demonstration of mGluR5 activation as a therapeutic target in schizophrenia temper enthusiasm. However, the demonstrated ability to enhance NMDA receptor signaling at the neuronal level will encourage the future development and testing of mGluR5 ligands.

GABAA receptors as therapeutic targets for schizophrenia

GABAergic pathology in schizophrenia

There is now substantial evidence that GABA signaling is deficient in corticolimbic regions, particularly in the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and hippocampus, of patients with schizophrenia. One of the most consistent postmortem findings in schizophrenia is a reduction in the mRNA expression level of GAD67 in PV+-GABAergic interneurons, as well as reductions in PV expression itself.[172] PV+ interneurons exhibit fast-spiking firing properties and target the spike -initiating region of pyramidal neuron axons, and are therefore thought to play a key role in controlling the overall firing properties of brain networks. Recent pharmacological, immunological, and genetic evidence from animal models suggests that inflammatory cytokine exposure (increased oxidative stress) and NMDA receptor hypofunction occurring during cortical development leads to permanent disturbances in neuronal circuits, specifically in the population of PV-containing interneurons.[173]

The reduced GABA signaling by PV+-interneurons onto pyramidal neurons could contribute to the working memory deficits observed in schizophrenia. PVinterneurons control the rate of pyramidal cell firing, thereby synchronizing oscillatory activity of cortical pyramidal neurons in the gamma band range (30 to 80 Hz).[174] Gamma oscillations regulate working memory and the transmission of information between cortical regions. Therefore, it is hypothesized that the asynchronous pyramidal neuronal activity resulting from aberrant PV+ GABAergic signaling contributes to the cognitive dysfunction observed in schizophrenia. It is because of this hypothesis that GABAA receptors are now being considered a viable pharmacologic target for treating the cognitive disturbances associated with schizophrenia.[172]

GABAA receptors are membrane proteins that form a heteropentameric GABA-gated chloride channel, which mediate largely tonic and phasic inhibition. They are composed of several classes of subunits (α1-6, β1-3, γ1-3, δ, ε, θ, π, ρ1-3), but generally consist of three types of subunits (α, β, γ). The majority of GABAA receptors are characterized by their sensitivity to benzodiazepines. These receptors contain subunits (α1, α2, α3, or α5), a β subunit (mainly β2 or β3), and in almost all cases the γ2 subunit in a 2:2:1 stoichiometry. Benzodiazepineinsensitive receptors contain α4, α6, or δinstead of γ2. In addition to their structural diversity, GABAA receptor subtypes have different expression patterns, pointing to unique roles for these receptor subtypes in regulating neuronal activity.[175]

Postmortem and genetic evidence suggest that α2/α3containing GABAA receptors are the most relevant targets for the treatment of cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia. It is the α2-containing GABAA receptors that are up regulated on the postsynaptic axon initial segments of pyramidal neurons in schizophrenia.[176] In mice, deletion of the α3 subunit results in mild hyperactivity and a pronounced deficit in PPI of the acoustic startle response, suggesting a hyperdopaminergic phenotype.[177] Targeting these specific receptor subtypes would circumvent the adverse cognitive and sedative effects associated with nonspecific agonists, like benzodiazepines, which are attributable to their affinity for α1 and/or α5containing GABAA receptors.[178]

α2-GABAA receptors

A recent proof-of-concept trial was conducted with MK0777, a benzodiazepine-like compound selective for GABAA receptors containing α2 or α3 subunits, to determine whether selective enhancement of GABAergic transmission would improve cognitive functions and gamma oscillations in patients with schizophrenia.[179] MK0777 improved the performance of patients in several working memory tasks, and was associated with increased gamma band power in the frontal cortex during task performance. However, MK-0777 did not significantly alter scores on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) or Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological status, except for improvement in the delayed memory index in the latter test.

α3-GABAA receptors

Mouse genetics supports the hypothesis that a3GABAA receptors are involved in sensorimotor gating,[177] a process that is disrupted in schizophrenia. Compounds that would selectively augment signaling through these receptors would be potentially beneficial in treating this schizophrenia endophenotype. As the a3containing GABAA receptor is the major subtype expressed on dopaminergic and other monoaminergic neurons,[180] agonists at this receptor might augment the inhibitory tone of these neurons and reverse their hyperfunctioning state in psychosis.

Cholinergic therapeutic targets

Muscarinic receptors

Muscarinic acetylcholine (mACh) receptors are widely distributed throughout the neocortex and are promising targets for numerous neurological and psychiatric disorders.[181] Five isoforms (M1-M5) of these G-protein coupled metabotropic receptors have been identified and characterized.[182] The therapeutic potential for muscarinic receptor activation in schizophrenia is fueled in large part by the efficacy of acetylcholine esterase inhibitors, which elevate synaptic acetylcholine levels, in reducing behavioral disturbances in Alzheimer's disease patients that are reminiscent of symptoms of schizophrenia.[183,184] These effects are in addition to the primary cognitive enhancement due to the therapy. Efficacy of these treatments could likely be due to downstream activation of mACh receptors. Consistent with the hypothesized therapeutic impact of mACh receptor activation is a small clinical trial in schizophrenia showing antipsychotic efficacy of the putative M1/M4 selective mACh receptor agonist xanomaline.[185]

Current cholinergic therapeutics are limited in their applicability because of aversive side-effect profiles that are attributed to peripheral activation of M2 and M3 mACh receptors.[186,187] For this reason, the development of subtype selective ligands has been a major interest. M1 and M4 subtypes are of greatest interest in schizophrenia, given the efficacy of xanomaline (an M1/M4-pref erring agonist) and postmortem findings of reduced M1 and M4 receptor densities in schizophrenia.[188,189] Studies with mutant mice support the targeting of M1 and M4 receptors. Null deletion mutants of M1 receptors display deficits in working memory and social memory,[190] as well as elevated baseline dopamine turnover and increased sensitivity to the behavioral and neurochemical effects of amphetamine.[191] Likewise M4 null mutant mice display hypersensitivity to amphetamine and PCP-induced increases in nucleus acccumbens dopamine, consistent with an involvement of NMDA receptors.[192]

In the absence of selective pharmacological tools, mutant animal studies have been used to improve our understanding of the neurophysiological role of mACh receptors.[187] M4 null mutant mice display enhanced baseline ACh efflux with in vivo dialysis in various brain regions, consistent with a prominent role as an autoreceptor[193] The finding that M1 null mutation abolishes ACh-mediated LTP of pyramidal neurons in the hippocampus[194] complements earlier work suggesting a similar role for M1 receptors in the potentiation of NMDA receptor currents.[195] Taken together, these studies suggest that M1 mACh receptors possess activity similar to that of mGlu5 receptors, modulating NMDA receptor signaling postsynaptically mACh receptors, like mGluRs, have proven to be difficult to selectively target at the orthosteric site. The agonist xanomaline, though often touted as M1/M4-selective, possesses prominent affinity for other subtypes. Recent progress has been made in the development of M1 and M4 PAMs and allosteric agonists for mACh receptors.[196] As with mGlu receptors, allosteric modulation appears to be a promising route for achieving pharmacological selectivity. Recent studies describe the activity of a M1-selective allosteric agonist, 1-(1'-2-methylbenzyl)-1,4'-bipiperidin4-yl)-1H-benzo[ d]imidazol-2(3H)-one (TBPB) and a PAM, benzylquinolone carboxylic acid (BQCA). In experiments that further elucidate the physiological roles of M1 receptors, TBPB enhances NMDA receptor currents; BQCA enhances the frequency and amplitude of spontaneous excitatory neurotransmission in the cortex.[197] In evidence of in vivo activity, TBPB reduced amphetamineinduced hyperactivity[198] and BQCA enhanced reversal learning in a murine transgenic model of Alzheimers' disease.[199] Likewise, the selective targeting of M4 receptors has proven successful via allosteric modulation.[197,200,201] These PAMs display in vivo efficacy, reducing amphetamine-induced hyperactivity (VU0152099201; and apomorphine-induced disruption of PPI (LY2033298).[200] These limited pharmacological studies serve as merely a proof of concept. As these compounds (and others with optimized pharmacokinetics) are more widely tested, we are likely to gain a better understanding of the function of and therapeutic potential for targeting M1 and M4 ACh receptors.

Nicotine and schizophrenia

The involvement of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia was initially suggested by behavioral and biochemical data. People with schizophrenia, in both inpatient and outpatient settings, smoke cigarettes at a rate (80%) more than threefold higher than the general population smoking rate in the United States.[202] They are also heavier smokers[203] and extract more nicotine per cigarette smoked than the general population.[204] Their motivation to quit smoking is low[205] and the smoking cessation rates are lower than the rates of the general population.[203] Furthermore, in schizophrenic patients, cigarette smoking normalized their deficits in sensory gating.[206] Patients with schizophrenia also have reductions in the numbers of [3H]-cytisine and [125I]-abungarotoxin binding sites in the hippocampus as well as elevated serum levels of nAChR antibodies compared with controls.[207]

The high rate and heavy level of smoking in schizophrenic subjects suggest that they might be medicating themselves with nicotine to reduce cognitive impairments associated with the disorder and/or antipsychotic treatment. Patients report that they smoke as a sedative, to reduce negative symptoms, and to counteract medication side effects.[208] Studies have demonstrated that nicotine administration produces positive effects on sensory gating, eye movements, negative symptoms, some cognitive tasks, and movement disorders. Although nicotine is therapeutic for certain aspects of schizophrenia, it has several limitations that hinder its clinical utility. Nicotine induces tachyphylaxis and carries abuse liability. The long-term risks of chronic treatment are unknown but might include carcinogenic features and cerebro- or cardiovascular risks. Therefore, novel nicotinic agonists have been developed that are more selective than nicotine for particular nAChR subtypes, and may provide cognitive benefits similar to nicotine, with fewer adverse side effects.

nAChRs

Neuronal nAChRs are widely expressed in the central nervous system and mediate fast synaptic signaling and the release of other neurotransmitters. They are involved in numerous physiological functions including cognition (attention and working/associative memory performance), neuronal development, particularly in the sensory cortex, and reward mechanisms via the mesocorticolimbic system.[209] Cholinergic modulation also plays a critical role in the functioning of neural circuits, including those involving glutamatergic, GABAergic, and dopaminergic innervations.

nAChRs are excitatory neurotransmitter-gated ion channels that belong to a superfamily that includes other ionotropic receptors for 5-HT, glycine, and GABA. This family of receptors is comprised of 16 different subunits in humans (α1 -7, α9-10, β1-4, δ, ε, γ). This wide variety of subtypes of nAChRs arising from combinations of subunits displays a range of different functional and pharmacological properties. Neuronal nAChRs are assembled from five transmembrane subunits that are arranged around a central water-filled pore. Neuronal subunits that form nAChRs in αβ combinations include α2-α6 and β2-β4. Although most nAChRs subunits assemble only into heteropentameric receptor ion channel combinations, the α7 subunits are able to generate functional homomeric nAChRs.[209] nAChRs composed of α4β2 and α7 subunits make up the majority of the nAChRs in the brain. There are two ACh binding sites per receptor. Mammalian nAChRs are cation-selective, being permeable to small monovalent and divalent cations like Ca2+. Nicotinic receptor activity causes depolarization, and the divalent cation permeability plays an important physiological role by supplying ionic signals, including Ca2+.

α7nAChRs

α7 nAChRs are abundantly expressed in the hippocampus and cortex. They have distinct characteristics due to their homopentameric composition that distinguishes them from the other nAChR subtypes. α7 nAChRs are rapidly desensitizing, are an order of magnitude less sensitive to nicotine as an agonist, and have a higher calcium permeability than other nAChRs.[209]

Because cholinergic innervation arises from projections that send diffuse afferents to a broad range of brain areas, nicotinic activity is a modulatory signal that subtly influences many neurotransmitter systems and contributes to the overall efficiency of various neural circuits. Cholinergic fibers innervate the entire hippocampus with synaptic contacts made onto granule cells, pyramidal cells, interneurons, and neurons of the hilus.[210] The hippocampus expresses a wide variety of nAChR subunits, but the α7, α4, and β2 subunits predominate. The GABAergic interneurons more densely express nAChRs than do the glutamatergic cells. Activation of a7nAChRs on presynaptic terminals of glutamatergic pyramidal neurons increases intraterminal Ca2+ levels to facilitate glutamate release.[211] α7nAChRs are also present in high density at postsynaptic sites on PV+-GABAergic interneurons[212] that are vulnerable in schizophrenia,[130] where they mediate fast cholinergic excitatory transmission.[213] In the cortex, cholinergic innervation sparsely reaches all layers, but layer V is the most heavily innervated, especially in the motor and sensory areas. The manner in which nicotinic signaling affects cortical activity is dependent on which part of the pyramidal cell the nAChRs are activated. Activation of nAChRs on distal apical dendrites depolarizes the cell and promotes action potential firing, while activation on proximal apical dendrites reduces membrane impedance and shunts signals from the apical tuft.[209] Midbrain dopamine neurons in the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area (VTA) express a variety of nAChR subunits (α4-α7 and β2), with β2 subunit containing nAChRs dominating (~40% of rat dopaminergic VTA neurons express the a7nAChR subunit.[214] Cholinergic afferents into the midbrain enhance glutamate transmission via mainly presynaptic oc7 nAChRs on glutamatergic terminals,[215] thereby influencing the firing frequency and firing modes of DA neurons.[216]

Association of α7nAChRs with schizophrenia

α7 nAChRs have been associated with schizophrenia across several domains. A linkage was found between the α7 nAChR and schizophrenia on chromosome 15q13-14,[206] a region containing the gene that encodes for the oc7 nAChR (CHRNA-7). Although no amino acid-coding region polymorphisms have been found, multiple single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the promoter region of CHRNA-7 as well as a partial duplication of CHRNA-7, have been characterized, with certain alleles more frequently present in people with schizophrenia.[217] Reduced α7 receptor binding was found in the reticular nucleus of the thalamus,[218] hippocampus,[219] and cingulate cortex.[220] Moreover, there were reduced a7 subunit levels in the DLPFC,[221] as well as reduced mRNA expression of α7 in peripheral blood lymphocytes[222] of patients with schizophrenia. In addition to the clinical data, preclinical evidence implicates α7nAChR function in regulating cognition. Mice deficient in α7nAChRs have impaired sustained attention,[223] while administration of α7nAChR antagonists[224] and agonists[225] impair and enhance, respectively, working memory in rodents.

α7nAChR full agonists

The α7nAChR agonist, (-)-spiro[1-azabucyclo[2,2,2]octane3,5'-oxazolidin-2'-one] (ARR 17779), significantly improved learning and memory in rats,[225] while an α7nAChR agonist with 5-HT3 receptor antagonist properties, improved the inhibition of the P50 response in schizophrenia.[226] A novel selective oc7nAChR agonist, 5-morpholin-4-yl-pentaoic acid (4-pyridin-3-yl-phenyl)-amide (SEN12333), with only weak antagonist activity at α3-containing receptors, was shown to have procognitive properties in rats across several domains, including episodic memory, attention, and perceptual processing.[227]

α7nAChR partial agonists

3-(2,4 Dimethoxy)benzylidene-anabaseine (DMXBA) is one of a series of compounds derived from anabaseine, an alkaloid found in marine worms. DMXBA is a partial agonist at the α7nAChR and is a weak competitive antagonist at the α4/32 nAChR and at the 5-HT3 receptor. The metabolites of DMXBA are also active at these receptors, but their biological effect may be limited due to their greater polarity, and therefore greater difficulty in crossing the blood-brain barrier. In preclinical animal models, DMXBA was shown to improve learning and memory-related behaviors in multiple paradigms, including nonspatial avoidance task,[228] delayed matching to sample,[229] Morris water maze,[228] and classic eye-blink conditioning.[230] DMXBA also normalizes auditory gating in the DBA/2 mouse, a strain with no sensory inhibition under routine experimental conditions.[231]

Because of the success of DMXBA in preclinical trials, its effects on cognition were initially evaluated in normal subjects.[232] DMXBA significantly improved simple reaction time, correct detection during digit vigilance, both immediate and delayed word recall, word and picture recognition memory, and performance speed on a numeric and spatial working memory task.[233] A second Phase I trial was conducted in persons with schizophrenia.[234] This double-blind study found that DMXBA normalized auditory evoked responses in both the P50 ratio and the test wave amplitude in patients. DMXBA also improved performance on the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) and the Attention subscale, with effect sizes more favorable when compared with second-generation antipsychotics. However, DMXBA did not produce changes in the BPRS and therefore did not affect positive, negative, or anxiety related symptoms.

An initial Phase II trial recently assessed the clinical effects of DMXBA on the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery, as well as the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS).[235] Although DMXBA did not significantly improve MATRICS cognitive measures, patients reported significant improvements on the SANS total score, most notably on the anhedonia and alogia subscales. fMRI was also conducted in this trial to ascertain if DMXBA would have an effect on hippocampal activity[236] In schizophrenia, increased hippocampal hemodynamic activity is often observed during many tasks, including smooth pursuit eye movements, and is thought to be the result of hippocampal interneuron dysfunction. DMXBA (150 mg) reduced hippocampal activity in patients during pursuit eye movements consistent with the established function of α7nAChRs on hippocampal inhibitory interneurons.

R3487/MEM3454 is a partial α7nAChR agonist and a 5HT3 receptor antagonist. R3487/MEM3454 has been shown to be efficacious in multiple animal behavioral paradigms that evaluate episodic, spatial, and working memory function as well as sustained attention.[237] 4-bromophenyl-1 ,4-diazabicyclo[3 ,2,2]nonane-4-carboxylatehydrochloride (SSR1 80711) is a partial a7 nAChR agonist, with no significant binding and/or functional activity at other human nAChRs. This compound produced electrophysiological, biochemical, and behavioral effects predictive of cognitive benefit in schizophrenia.[238239] SSR180711 also normalized abnormally persistent latent inhibition produced by an acute pharmacologic model (MK801) and a neurodevelopmental model (inhibition of nitric oxide production during the very early postnatal period), which are used as models of impaired cognitive flexibility in schizophrenia.[240] Moreover, SSR180711 reversed amphetamine -induced disruption of latent inhibition, an effect considered to be predictive of activity against the positive symptoms of schizophrenia.[240]

Positive allosteric modulators of α7nAChRs

Positive allosteric modulators of α7nAChRs have attracted interest as potential compounds for the treatment of cognitive deficits associated with schizophrenia. α7nAChRs PAMs have been classified as either type I or type II compounds. Type I compounds mainly affect the peak current response, while type II compounds affect both the peak current response, as well as the kinetics of agonist-evoked responses.[241] 1-(5-chloro-2, 4-dimethoxyphenyl)-3-(5-methyl-isoxazol-3-yl)-urea (PNU-120956) is a prototypical type II PAM with little or no activity on most other nAChR subtypes.[242] LY-2087101 is a recently discovered allosteric potentiator of nAChRs that is less selective for α7 nAChRs than PNU-120956, with properties similar to type I PAMs.[243] There are five amino acids in three a-helical transmembrane regions of the α7nAChR that are critical in facilitating the potentiaton of agonist evoked responses by PNU-120956 and LY2087101.[244] In addition to amplifying or unmasking α7nAChR responses to exogenous agonist, PAMs can potentially augment the effects of endogenous agonist, especially PNU-120956, since it reduces α7nAChR desensitization.[242]

Genetic, biochemical, and behavioral findings have linked α7nAChRs to schizophrenia, particularly the cognitive and sensory processing components of the disease.[245] The ability of α7nAChR agonists (partial and full) and PAMs to improve a wide range of cognitive processes preclinically, and to a lesser extent clinically, makes them attractive targets for mitigating the cognitive deficits associated with schizophrenia that are not responsive to current first- and second-generation antipsychotics.

Conclusion

While this review is hardly exhaustive, it does identify a number of potential drug discovery targets that could address the symptoms most resistant to current treatments available for schizophrenia. As psychosis is a downstream consequence of a primary cortical dysfunction, it is possible that some of these interventions might not only affect the cognitive deficits and negative symptoms, but also positive symptoms. In this regard, the mGluR2/3 agonist, LY21 40023, which has no direct effects on dopaminergic neuronal function, exhibited antipsychotic effects comparable to the positive control, olanzapine.[140] Alternatively, other interventions might have only selective effects on negative symptoms and/or cognition, and thus would require the coadministration of an antipsychotic to reduce positive symptoms, much in the way that the combination of a mood stabilizer and an antipsychotic are used to treat bipolar disorder.

As the complex genetics of schizophrenia are resolved, it may be possible in the future to link risk genes to drugs that directly address their mechanisms. For example, an a7nAChR positive modulator might be particularly effective in those patients found to have an allelic variant of the CHRNA7 promoter that is associated with reduced expression.[246] Genetic studies indicate that individual risk genes such as common alleles of GABAA receptors are associated with elevated risk for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and autism-spectrum disorders.[247] Such shared risk genes or shared copy number variants provide face validity for the conviction that drug discovery around these targets may yield a much broader therapeutic impact than just in schizophrenia. However, in keeping with the complex genetics of neuropsychiatric disorders, drugs targeting these pathways will likely be useful only in particular subgroups of patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and autism-spectrum disorders.