Literature DB >> 20952782

How might the discrepancy in the effects of perceptual variables on numerosity judgment be reconciled?

Midori Tokita1, Akira Ishiguchi.   

Abstract

It has been claimed that a genuinely abstract numerical representation would be capable of representing the numerosity of any set of discrete elements independently of the attributes of the individual elements. In practice, however, perceptual variables, such as element size, density, and others, affect numerosity judgment. In this study, we examined how perceptual variables affect the performance of numerosity judgments under the control of factors such as amount of practice and set size. In Experiment 1, we introduced the numerosity comparison task to less experienced observers in order to examine the effect of element size and array area. In Experiment 2, we examined whether and how practice would influence precision and accuracy in numerosity comparison and demonstrated that the effects of perceptual variables mostly disappeared. In Experiment 3, we examined whether the effect of practice could transfer to the performance in different stimulus conditions. Taking the results together, we demonstrate that differences in practice might be the source of inconsistent results for perceptual variables.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20952782     DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.7.1839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  21 in total

1.  Evidence for distinct magnitude systems for symbolic and non-symbolic number.

Authors:  Delphine Sasanguie; Bert De Smedt; Bert Reynvoet
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-12-26

2.  A common visual metric for approximate number and density.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; Marc S Tibber; John A Greenwood; Frederick A A Kingdom; Michael J Morgan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Hysteresis affects approximate number discrimination in young children.

Authors:  Darko Odic; Howard Hock; Justin Halberda
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-11-19

4.  Modeling the approximate number system to quantify the contribution of visual stimulus features.

Authors:  Nicholas K DeWind; Geoffrey K Adams; Michael L Platt; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-06-06

5.  Behavioral evidence for format-dependent processes in approximate numerosity representation.

Authors:  Midori Tokita; Akira Ishiguchi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

6.  Developmental change in the acuity of approximate number and area representations.

Authors:  Darko Odic; Melissa E Libertus; Lisa Feigenson; Justin Halberda
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2012-08-13

7.  Set size and culture influence children's attention to number.

Authors:  Lisa Cantrell; Megumi Kuwabara; Linda B Smith
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2014-11-29

8.  Malleability of the approximate number system: effects of feedback and training.

Authors:  Nicholas K Dewind; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Magnitude processing in non-symbolic stimuli.

Authors:  Tali Leibovich; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-25

10.  Are there rapid feedback effects on Approximate Number System acuity?

Authors:  Marcus Lindskog; Anders Winman; Peter Juslin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.