Literature DB >> 20952216

Rupture rates of small abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review of the literature.

J T Powell1, S M Gotensparre, M J Sweeting, L C Brown, F G R Fowkes, S G Thompson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Small aneurysms of the abdominal aorta (3.0-5.5 cm in diameter) often are managed by regular surveillance, rather than surgery, because the risk of surgery is considered to outweigh the risk of aneurysm rupture. The risk of small aneurysm rupture is considered to be low. The purpose of this review is to summarise the reported estimates of small aneurysm rupture rates. METHODS AND
FINDINGS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature published before 2010 and identified 54 potentially eligible reports. Detailed review of these studies showed that both ascertainment of rupture, patient follow-up and causes of death were poorly reported: diagnostic criteria for rupture were never reported. There were only 14 studies from which rupture rates (as ruptures per 100 person-years) were available. These 14 published studies included 9779 patients (89% male) over the time period 1976-2006 but only 7 of these studies provided rupture rates specifically for the diameter range 3.0-5.5 cm, which ranged from 0 to 1.61 ruptures per 100 person-years.
CONCLUSIONS: Rupture rates of small abdominal aortic aneurysms would appear to be low, but most studies have been poorly reported and did not have clear ascertainment and diagnostic criteria for aneurysm rupture. Copyright Â
© 2010 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20952216     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  7 in total

1.  Increased expression and activation of absent in melanoma 2 inflammasome components in lymphocytic infiltrates of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Susanne Dihlmann; Philipp Erhart; Arianeb Mehrabi; Arash Nickkholgh; Felix Lasitschka; Dittmar Böckler; Maani Hakimi
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 6.354

Review 2.  Imaging Predictive Factors of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Growth.

Authors:  Petroula Nana; Konstantinos Spanos; Konstantinos Dakis; Alexandros Brodis; George Kouvelos
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  (18)F-FDG PET scanning of abdominal aortic aneurysms and correlation with molecular characteristics: a systematic review.

Authors:  U T Timur; J A van Herwaarden; D Mihajlovic; P De Jong; W Mali; F L Moll
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.138

Review 4.  The Obsolete Maximum Diameter Criterion, the Evident Role of Biomechanical (Pressure) Indices, the New Role of Hemodynamic (Flow) Indices, and the Multi-Modal Approach to the Rupture Risk Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Nikolaos Kontopodis; Konstantinos Tzirakis; Christos V Ioannou
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2018-03-25

5.  A ruptured mycotic aortic aneurysm in a patient with urinary retention: A case report.

Authors:  Samantha L Gaetani; Jerome C Deutsch; Mila H Ju
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2022-03-01

6.  Final follow-up of the Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) randomized trial of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.

Authors:  S G Thompson; H A Ashton; L Gao; M J Buxton; R A P Scott
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Prehabilitation exercise therapy before elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Candida Fenton; Audrey R Tan; Ukachukwu Okoroafor Abaraogu; James E McCaslin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-07-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.