OBJECTIVE: To assess associations between the main, nonlinear, and interactive effects of the demand-control-support (DCS) model and the cortisol/dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) ratio, a biomarker of psychophysical well-being. METHODS: Subjects were 596 employees from all occupational levels of a German airplane manufacturing plant. Multiple regression models controlling for age and gender were computed separately for employees with (n = 103) and without (n = 493) management responsibilities. RESULTS: Among employees without management responsibilities, the dimensions of the DCS model did not predict the cortisol/DHEA-S ratio. In contrast, among employees with management responsibilities, both linear and nonlinear job demand effects explained a substantial fraction of the cortisol/DHEA-S variance. Increasing levels of job demands were associated with decreasing cortisol/DHEA-S ratios (linear effect) with the quartile of moderately high levels of job demands representing an optimal level. Furthermore, we observed a significant nonlinear effect with job control and a significant interaction between job demands and job control among employees with management responsibilities. These results suggest a beneficial effect associated with moderate levels of job control. This may be due to a buffering effect against adverse levels of job demands (interactive effect) and the independent association with decreased cortisol/DHEA-S ratios (nonlinear effect). CONCLUSION: This is the first study that provides evidence that the DCS model is associated with the cortisol/DHEA-S ratio. Among employees with management responsibilities, moderate levels of job control may help managers to cope effectively with job demands and may induce a favorable cortisol/DHEA-S ratio.
OBJECTIVE: To assess associations between the main, nonlinear, and interactive effects of the demand-control-support (DCS) model and the cortisol/dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) ratio, a biomarker of psychophysical well-being. METHODS: Subjects were 596 employees from all occupational levels of a German airplane manufacturing plant. Multiple regression models controlling for age and gender were computed separately for employees with (n = 103) and without (n = 493) management responsibilities. RESULTS: Among employees without management responsibilities, the dimensions of the DCS model did not predict the cortisol/DHEA-S ratio. In contrast, among employees with management responsibilities, both linear and nonlinear job demand effects explained a substantial fraction of the cortisol/DHEA-S variance. Increasing levels of job demands were associated with decreasing cortisol/DHEA-S ratios (linear effect) with the quartile of moderately high levels of job demands representing an optimal level. Furthermore, we observed a significant nonlinear effect with job control and a significant interaction between job demands and job control among employees with management responsibilities. These results suggest a beneficial effect associated with moderate levels of job control. This may be due to a buffering effect against adverse levels of job demands (interactive effect) and the independent association with decreased cortisol/DHEA-S ratios (nonlinear effect). CONCLUSION: This is the first study that provides evidence that the DCS model is associated with the cortisol/DHEA-S ratio. Among employees with management responsibilities, moderate levels of job control may help managers to cope effectively with job demands and may induce a favorable cortisol/DHEA-S ratio.
Authors: Burkhard Schmidt; Adrian Loerbroks; Raphael M Herr; Mark G Wilson; Marc N Jarczok; David Litaker; Daniel Mauss; Jos A Bosch; Joachim E Fischer Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2014
Authors: Jian Li; Marc N Jarczok; Adrian Loerbroks; Ina Schöllgen; Johannes Siegrist; Jos A Bosch; Mark G Wilson; Daniel Mauss; Joachim E Fischer Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2013-12
Authors: Anna-Karin Lennartsson; Töres Theorell; Alan L Rockwood; Mark M Kushnir; Ingibjörg H Jonsdottir Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-08-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sónia do Vale; Lenka Selinger; João Martin Martins; Ana Coelho Gomes; Manuel Bicho; Isabel do Carmo; Carles Escera Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-08-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Johanna Sieurin; Ross Andel; Annika Tillander; Elise G Valdes; Nancy L Pedersen; Karin Wirdefeldt Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2018-08-25 Impact factor: 10.338