Literature DB >> 20946162

Early versus late rehabilitation of erectile function after nerve-sparing radical cystoprostatectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Ahmed Mosbah1, Magdy El Bahnasawy, Yasser Osman, Ihab A Hekal, Essam Abou-Beih, Atallah Shaaban.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Pharmacological rehabilitation of erectile function (EF) after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy was repeatedly advocated. AIM: To compare early vs. late penile rehabilitation in patients with nerve-sparing (NS) radical cystoprostatectomy based on a prospective randomized trial.
METHODS: Eighteen patients without spontaneous erection 8 weeks after NS radical cystoprostatectomy were randomly divided into two groups; group I and II who started the erectogenic therapy at the 2nd and 6th month postoperatively, respectively. The pharmacological therapy constitutes of sildenafil citrate twice weekly to be shifted to intracavernosal injection (ICI) of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) if not responding. The treatment continued for 6 months in both groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The EF status was evaluated before and at the end of the treatment by International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire and penile Doppler ultrasonography (PDU).
RESULTS: Six out of nine patients recovered unassisted erection after treatment in group I compared to three out of nine patients in group II. Two patients in group I and three patients in group II were maintained on sildenafil therapy on demand basis. The remaining four patients were dependent on ICI of PGE1. At final evaluation, a significant improvement was found in the EF, the intercourse satisfaction and overall satisfaction domains (P = 0.02, 0.03, and 0.02, respectively) in group I compared with group II. Regarding PDU findings, significant improvement in end-diastolic velocity was elicited in the early rehabilitation group compared with the pretreatment value (P = 0.03) with no significant difference between both groups.
CONCLUSION: Early compared with delayed erectile rehabilitation brings forward the natural healing time of potency and maintains nerve-assisted erection.
© 2010 International Society for Sexual Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20946162     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02046.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  8 in total

Review 1.  Penile rehabilitation: the evolutionary concept in the management of erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Tariq S Hakky; Adam S Baumgarten; Justin Parker; Yin Zheng; Mike Kongnyuy; Daniel Martinez; Rafael E Carrion
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Interventions to address sexual problems in people with cancer.

Authors:  L Barbera; C Zwaal; D Elterman; K McPherson; W Wolfman; A Katz; A Matthew
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  What is the current role of intracavernosal injection in management of erectile dysfunction?

Authors:  A I El-Sakka
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 4.  Erectile dysfunction in Arab countries. Part II: Diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Ahmed I El-Sakka
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-03-15

Review 5.  Reversion of penile fibrosis: Current information and a new horizon.

Authors:  Ahmed I El-Sakka
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2011-05-06

6.  Development of UK recommendations on treatment for post-surgical erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  M G Kirby; I D White; J Butcher; B Challacombe; J Coe; L Grover; P Hegarty; G Jackson; A Lowndes; H Payne; J Rees; V Sangar; A Thompson
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  Pharmacologic and surgical therapies for sexual dysfunction in male cancer survivors.

Authors:  Ateş Kadıoğlu; Mazhar Ortaç; Gerald Brock
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2015-04

8.  Impact on sexual function of surgical treatment in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Pedro Costa; João M Cardoso; Hugo Louro; Jorge Dias; Luís Costa; Raquel Rodrigues; Paulo Espiridião; Jorge Maciel; Luís Ferraz
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.