Literature DB >> 20945748

In vitro detection of secondary caries associated with composite restorations on approximal surfaces using laser fluorescence.

Jonas A Rodrigues1, Klaus W Neuhaus, Isabel Hug, Herman Stich, Rainer Seemann, Adrian Lussi.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the performance of the DIAGNOdent pen laser fluorescence device (LFpen) in comparison with visual examination (VE), bitewing radiographs (BW) and visual examination combined with bitewing radiographs (VEBW) in detecting secondary approximal caries associated with composite restorations. In total, 60 approximal surfaces from 43 permanent molars with composite restorations were assessed twice by two examiners using the LFpen, VE, BW and VEBW. After histological preparation and hardness measurements, the sample was assigned to either a crown or root caries group, depending on the location of the lesions as the gold standard. For crown caries at D1, the highest values of specificity and sensitivity were observed for the LFpen at a cutoff value of 18 (1.00) and for the VEBW (0.89). At D3 (cutoff of 30), the LFpen showed the highest values of sensitivity and specificity. For root caries, the LFpen and VEBW showed the highest values of specificity (0.54), sensitivity (0.81) and accuracy (0.69). The Spearman rank correlation coefficients for crown/root caries with histology were 0.54/0.37 (LFpen), 0.29/0.10 (BW), 0.29/0.18 (VE) and 0.23/0.37 (VEBW). For the LFpen, the ICC varied from 0.80 (interexaminer) to 0.97 (intraexaminer B); the kappa value was 0.19 for BW and 0.35 for VE (interexaminer). Intraexaminer kappa values for BW were 0.25 (A) and 0.29 (B), and those for VE were 0.31 (A) and 0.32 (B). The LFpen device exhibited a performance comparable to that of conventional methods but with higher interexaminer reproducibility. Therefore, the LFpen should be considered an auxiliary method for the detection of secondary approximal caries associated with composite restorations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20945748     DOI: 10.2341/09-332-L

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  10 in total

1.  Clinical cross-polarization optical coherence tomography assessment of subsurface enamel below dental resin composite restorations.

Authors:  Patricia Lenton; Joel Rudney; Alex Fok; Robert S Jones
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-05-07

2.  Validity of wax and acrylic as soft-tissue simulation materials used in in vitro radiographic studies.

Authors:  L Schropp; N S Alyass; A Wenzel; A Stavropoulos
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Caries detection under composite restorations by laser fluorescence and digital radiography.

Authors:  Suwadee Kositbowornchai; Chotikpanich Sukanya; Tangkittikasem Tidarat; Thongsombat Chanoggarn
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Evaluation of Accuracy of DIAGNOdent in Diagnosis of Primary and Secondary Caries in Comparison to Conventional Methods.

Authors:  Hanieh Nokhbatolfoghahaie; Marzieh Alikhasi; Nasim Chiniforush; Farzaneh Khoei; Nassimeh Safavi; Behnoush Yaghoub Zadeh
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013

5.  Accuracy of different approaches for detecting proximal root caries lesions in vitro.

Authors:  Gerd Göstemeyer; Mareike Preus; Karim Elhennawy; Falk Schwendicke; Sebastian Paris; Haitham Askar
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.606

6.  In Vitro Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of DIAGNOdent and Digital Radiography for Detection of Secondary Proximal Caries Adjacent to Composite Restorations.

Authors:  Zahra Ghoncheh; Zahra Zonouzy; Nazanin Kiomarsi; Mohammad Javad Kharazifar; Nasim Chiniforush
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-09-27

7.  Tests to detect and inform the diagnosis of root caries.

Authors:  Patrick A Fee; Richard Macey; Tanya Walsh; Janet E Clarkson; David Ricketts
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-12-07

8.  An in vivo comparison of two diagnostic methods in secondary caries detection.

Authors:  Kazem Saber Hamishaki; Nasim Chiniforush; Abbas Monzavi; Mohammad Javad Khazarazifard
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2014-01-31

9.  Diagnostic value of DIAGNOdent in detecting caries under composite restorations of primary molars.

Authors:  Ava Vali Sichani; Shahrzad Javadinejad; Roshanak Ghafari
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

Review 10.  Efficacy of resin infiltration to mask post-orthodontic or non-post-orthodontic white spot lesions or fluorosis - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Bourouni; K Dritsas; D Kloukos; R J Wierichs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.573

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.