Literature DB >> 20944503

Reinforcing effects of d-amphetamine: influence of novel ratios on a progressive-ratio schedule.

Rajkumar J Sevak1, William W Stoops, Paul E A Glaser, Lon R Hays, Craig R Rush.   

Abstract

Progressive-ratio schedules are useful for studying the reinforcing effects of drugs. Earlier human laboratory studies showed that d-amphetamine significantly increased break points relative to placebo. However, the magnitude of the increase was modest, which may be attributable to rather high levels of placebo responding. We used novel response requirements in a modified progressive-ratio procedure and hypothesized that the altered range of response requirements would decrease responding for placebo and increase responding for d-amphetamine. Eight participants completed the study. The participants first sampled oral doses of d-amphetamine (0, 8, 16, and 24 mg). In subsequent sessions, the participants were offered the opportunity to work for the sampled dose on a modified progressive-ratio procedure with response requirements ranging from 400 to 1800 mouse clicks. A battery of participant-rated drug-effect questionnaires, a performance measure, and cardiovascular measures were included to more fully characterize the effects of d-amphetamine. Placebo maintained low levels of responding. The intermediate dose of d-amphetamine increased responding significantly above placebo levels. d-Amphetamine produced prototypical subject-rated effects that were an orderly function of dose. These data suggest that the modified response requirements resulted in lower levels of placebo taking and a larger separation between the number of placebo and d-amphetamine capsules earned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20944503      PMCID: PMC3815487          DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e32833fa7b3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Pharmacol        ISSN: 0955-8810            Impact factor:   2.293


  37 in total

1.  Progressive ratio and fixed ratio schedules of cocaine-maintained responding in baboons.

Authors:  R R Griffiths; L D Bradford; J V Brady
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Comparison of progressive-ratio performance maintained by cocaine, methylphenidate and secobarbital.

Authors:  R R Griffiths; J D Findley; J V Brady; K Dolan-Gutcher; W W Robinson
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1975-07-23

3.  Effects of d-amphetamine on performance under several parameters of multiple fixed-ratio, fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  D E McMillan
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Physiologic, subjective, and behavioral effects of amphetamine, methamphetamine, ephedrine, phenmetrazine, and methylphenidate in man.

Authors:  W R Martin; J W Sloan; J D Sapira; D R Jasinski
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1971 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  The progressive ratio schedule as a model for studying the psychomotor stimulant activity of drugs in the rat.

Authors:  M Poncelet; R Chermat; P Soubrie; P Simon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Human progressive-ratio performance: maintenance by pentobarbital.

Authors:  D R McLeod; R R Griffiths
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Drug preference and mood in humans: repeated assessment of d-amphetamine.

Authors:  C E Johanson; E H Uhlenhuth
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  Drug preference and mood in humans: d-amphetamine.

Authors:  C E Johanson; E H Uhlenhuth
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Reinforcing effects of caffeine in coffee and capsules.

Authors:  R R Griffiths; G E Bigelow; I A Liebson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Relationship between injection duration, transporter occupancy and reinforcing strength of cocaine.

Authors:  William L Woolverton; Zhixia Wang
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2004-02-23       Impact factor: 4.432

View more
  13 in total

1.  Influence of aripiprazole pretreatment on the reinforcing effects of methamphetamine in humans.

Authors:  William W Stoops; J Adam Bennett; Joshua A Lile; Rajkumar J Sevak; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.067

2.  Relationship between oral D-amphetamine self-administration and ratings of subjective effects: do subjective-effects ratings correspond with a progressive-ratio measure of drug-taking behavior?

Authors:  B Levi Bolin; Anna R Reynolds; William W Stoops; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.293

3.  Amphetamine self-administration in light and moderate drinkers.

Authors:  Matthew D Stanley; Mégan M Poole; William W Stoops; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Separate and combined impact of acute naltrexone and alprazolam on subjective and physiological effects of oral d-amphetamine in stimulant users.

Authors:  Katherine R Marks; Joshua A Lile; William W Stoops; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Alternative reinforcer response cost impacts methamphetamine choice in humans.

Authors:  J Adam Bennett; William W Stoops; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 3.533

6.  Abuse Potential of Oral Phendimetrazine in Cocaine-dependent Individuals: Implications for Agonist-like Replacement Therapy.

Authors:  B Levi Bolin; William W Stoops; Jeremy P Sites; Craig R Rush
Journal:  J Addict Med       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.702

7.  Development of a translational model to screen medications for cocaine use disorder II: Choice between intravenous cocaine and money in humans.

Authors:  Joshua A Lile; William W Stoops; Craig R Rush; S Stevens Negus; Paul E A Glaser; Kevin W Hatton; Lon R Hays
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Fixation time is a sensitive measure of cocaine cue attentional bias.

Authors:  Katherine R Marks; Walter Roberts; William W Stoops; Erika Pike; Mark T Fillmore; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Effects of acute oral naltrexone on the subjective and physiological effects of oral D-amphetamine and smoked cocaine in cocaine abusers.

Authors:  Sandra D Comer; Shanthi Mogali; Phillip A Saccone; Paula Askalsky; Diana Martinez; Ellen A Walker; Jermaine D Jones; Suzanne K Vosburg; Ziva D Cooper; Perrine Roux; Maria A Sullivan; Jeanne M Manubay; Eric Rubin; Abigail Pines; Emily L Berkower; Margaret Haney; Richard W Foltin
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Separate and Combined Effects of Naltrexone and Extended-Release Alprazolam on the Reinforcing, Subject-Rated, and Cardiovascular Effects of Methamphetamine.

Authors:  Katherine R Marks; Joshua A Lile; William W Stoops; Paul E A Glaser; Lon R Hays; Craig R Rush
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.