Literature DB >> 1161995

Comparison of progressive-ratio performance maintained by cocaine, methylphenidate and secobarbital.

R R Griffiths, J D Findley, J V Brady, K Dolan-Gutcher, W W Robinson.   

Abstract

Cocaine, methylphenidate and secobarbital were compared on a drug maintained progressive-ratio procedure in baboon subjects. Trials, scheduled throughout the day, occurred at a minimum interval of 3 hrs after completion of the preceding trial. A ratio response requirement on the "initiate" lever was required during each trial which terminated in a single intravenous infusion of drug. A drug was introduced on the progressive-ratio procedure with a low ratio requirement in order to obtain a baseline performance of a high stable frequency of trial completion. The ratio requirement was systematically increased every 7 days until the "breaking point" when the rate of completing trials fell below a criterion level. Within-subject comparison revealed that cocaine produced higher breaking points than methylphenidate at the same absolute dose, 0.4 mg/kg. At the range of doses studied, manipulation of doses of methylphenidate (0.1-0.8 mg/kg) and cocaine (0.4-1.6 mg/kg) had little effect on breaking point. In contrast, increasing doses of secobarbital (6.0 and 12.0 mg/kg) produce higher breaking points within the same subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1161995     DOI: 10.1007/bf00437619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacologia


  36 in total

1.  Progressive ratio and fixed ratio schedules of cocaine-maintained responding in baboons.

Authors:  R R Griffiths; L D Bradford; J V Brady
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  On distinguishing progressively increasing response requirements for reinforcement.

Authors:  David P Jarmolowicz; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2010

3.  Replacing relative reinforcing efficacy with behavioral economic demand curves.

Authors:  Matthew W Johnson; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Tests of behavioral-economic assessments of relative reinforcer efficacy: economic substitutes.

Authors:  Gregory J Madden; John R Smethells; Eric E Ewan; Steven R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Cocaine and food as reinforcers: effects of reinforcer magnitude and response requirement under second-order fixed-ratio and progressive-ratio schedules.

Authors:  D J Spear; J L Katz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 6.  Animal models of drug craving.

Authors:  A Markou; F Weiss; L H Gold; S B Caine; G Schulteis; G F Koob
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Heroin self-administration in rats under a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement.

Authors:  D C Roberts; S A Bennett
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Self-injection of barbiturates and benzodiazepines in baboons.

Authors:  R R Griffiths; S E Lukas; L D Bradford; J V Brady; J D Snell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Comparison of behavior maintained by infusions of eight phenylethylamines in baboons.

Authors:  R R Griffiths; G Winger; J V Brady; J D Snell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1976-11-24       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Effects of increasing response requirement on choice between cocaine and food in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  M A Nader; W L Woolverton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.