BACKGROUND: Infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 or HPV18 elicits an antibody response, but whether the elicited antibodies protect women against subsequent infection by a homologous HPV type compared with seronegative women is unknown. METHODS: Study participants were women aged 18-25 years at enrollment in the control group of the ongoing National Cancer Institute-sponsored, community-based, randomized HPV16/18 Costa Rica Vaccine Trial. At enrollment, 2813 participants were negative for cervical HPV16 DNA and 2950 for HPV18 DNA. Women were interviewed regarding sociodemographic data and medical and health history. Medical and pelvic examinations were conducted for all consenting sexually experienced women. Serum samples taken at enrollment were tested for total HPV16/18 antibodies with a polyclonal enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and cervical specimens were tested for type-specific HPV DNA over 4 years of follow-up. Using Poisson regression, we compared rate ratios of newly detected cervical HPV16 or HPV18 infection among homologous HPV-seropositive and HPV-seronegative women, adjusting for age, education, marital status, lifetime number of sexual partners, and smoking. RESULTS: There were 231 newly detected HPV16 infections during 5886 person-years among HPV16-seronegative women compared with 12 newly detected HPV16 infections during 581 person-years among HPV16-seropositive women with the highest HPV16 sero-levels. There were 136 newly detected HPV18 infections during 6352 person-years among HPV18-seronegative women compared with six new infections detected during 675 person-years among HPV18 seropositives with the highest sero-levels. After controlling for risk factors associated with newly detected HPV infection, having high HPV16 antibody titer at enrollment was associated with a reduced risk of subsequent HPV16 infection (women in the highest tertile of HPV16 antibody titers, adjusted rate ratio = 0.50, 95% confidence interval = 0.26 to 0.86 vs HPV16-seronegative women). Similarly, having high HPV18 antibody titer at enrollment was associated with a reduced risk of subsequent HPV18 infection (women in the highest tertile of HPV18 antibody titers, adjusted rate ratio = 0.36, 95% confidence interval = 0.14 to 0.76 vs HPV18-seronegative women). CONCLUSION: In this study population, having high antibody levels against HPV16 and HPV18 following natural infection was associated with reduced risk of subsequent HPV16 and HPV18 infections.
BACKGROUND:Infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 or HPV18 elicits an antibody response, but whether the elicited antibodies protect women against subsequent infection by a homologous HPV type compared with seronegative women is unknown. METHODS: Study participants were women aged 18-25 years at enrollment in the control group of the ongoing National Cancer Institute-sponsored, community-based, randomized HPV16/18 Costa Rica Vaccine Trial. At enrollment, 2813 participants were negative for cervical HPV16 DNA and 2950 for HPV18 DNA. Women were interviewed regarding sociodemographic data and medical and health history. Medical and pelvic examinations were conducted for all consenting sexually experienced women. Serum samples taken at enrollment were tested for total HPV16/18 antibodies with a polyclonal enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and cervical specimens were tested for type-specific HPV DNA over 4 years of follow-up. Using Poisson regression, we compared rate ratios of newly detected cervical HPV16 or HPV18 infection among homologous HPV-seropositive and HPV-seronegative women, adjusting for age, education, marital status, lifetime number of sexual partners, and smoking. RESULTS: There were 231 newly detected HPV16 infections during 5886 person-years among HPV16-seronegative women compared with 12 newly detected HPV16 infections during 581 person-years among HPV16-seropositive women with the highest HPV16sero-levels. There were 136 newly detected HPV18 infections during 6352 person-years among HPV18-seronegative women compared with six new infections detected during 675 person-years among HPV18 seropositives with the highest sero-levels. After controlling for risk factors associated with newly detected HPV infection, having high HPV16 antibody titer at enrollment was associated with a reduced risk of subsequent HPV16infection (women in the highest tertile of HPV16 antibody titers, adjusted rate ratio = 0.50, 95% confidence interval = 0.26 to 0.86 vs HPV16-seronegative women). Similarly, having high HPV18 antibody titer at enrollment was associated with a reduced risk of subsequent HPV18 infection (women in the highest tertile of HPV18 antibody titers, adjusted rate ratio = 0.36, 95% confidence interval = 0.14 to 0.76 vs HPV18-seronegative women). CONCLUSION: In this study population, having high antibody levels against HPV16 and HPV18 following natural infection was associated with reduced risk of subsequent HPV16 and HPV18 infections.
Authors: Troy J Kemp; Alfonso García-Piñeres; Roni T Falk; Sylviane Poncelet; Francis Dessy; Sandra L Giannini; Ana Cecilia Rodriguez; Carolina Porras; Rolando Herrero; Allan Hildesheim; Ligia A Pinto Journal: Vaccine Date: 2008-05-19 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: C D Harro; Y Y Pang; R B Roden; A Hildesheim; Z Wang; M J Reynolds; T C Mast; R Robinson; B R Murphy; R A Karron; J Dillner; J T Schiller; D R Lowy Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2001-02-21 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Darron R Brown; Susanne K Kjaer; Kristján Sigurdsson; Ole-Erik Iversen; Mauricio Hernandez-Avila; Cosette M Wheeler; Gonzalo Perez; Laura A Koutsky; Eng Hseon Tay; Patricía Garcia; Kevin A Ault; Suzanne M Garland; Sepp Leodolter; Sven-Eric Olsson; Grace W K Tang; Daron G Ferris; Jorma Paavonen; Marc Steben; F Xavier Bosch; Joakim Dillner; Elmar A Joura; Robert J Kurman; Slawomir Majewski; Nubia Muñoz; Evan R Myers; Luisa L Villa; Frank J Taddeo; Christine Roberts; Amha Tadesse; Janine Bryan; Lisa C Lupinacci; Katherine E D Giacoletti; Heather L Sings; Margaret James; Teresa M Hesley; Eliav Barr Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2009-04-01 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Laura A Koutsky; Kevin A Ault; Cosette M Wheeler; Darron R Brown; Eliav Barr; Frances B Alvarez; Lisa M Chiacchierini; Kathrin U Jansen Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-11-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: F Xavier Bosch; Ann N Burchell; Mark Schiffman; Anna R Giuliano; Silvia de Sanjose; Laia Bruni; Guillermo Tortolero-Luna; Susanne Kruger Kjaer; Nubia Muñoz Journal: Vaccine Date: 2008-08-19 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Francis J Dessy; Sandra L Giannini; Catherine A Bougelet; Troy J Kemp; Marie-Pierre M David; Sylviane M Poncelet; Ligia A Pinto; Martine A Wettendorff Journal: Hum Vaccin Date: 2008-11-11
Authors: J Paavonen; P Naud; J Salmerón; C M Wheeler; S-N Chow; D Apter; H Kitchener; X Castellsague; J C Teixeira; S R Skinner; J Hedrick; U Jaisamrarn; G Limson; S Garland; A Szarewski; B Romanowski; F Y Aoki; T F Schwarz; W A J Poppe; F X Bosch; D Jenkins; K Hardt; T Zahaf; D Descamps; F Struyf; M Lehtinen; G Dubin Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-07-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Rolando Herrero; Allan Hildesheim; Ana C Rodríguez; Sholom Wacholder; Concepción Bratti; Diane Solomon; Paula González; Carolina Porras; Silvia Jiménez; Diego Guillen; Jorge Morales; Mario Alfaro; Jean Cyr; Kerrygrace Morrisey; Yenory Estrada; Bernal Cortés; Lidia Ana Morera; Enrique Freer; John Schussler; John Schiller; Douglas Lowy; Mark Schiffman Journal: Vaccine Date: 2008-07-18 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Gloria Y F Ho; Yevgeniy Studentsov; Charles B Hall; Robert Bierman; Leah Beardsley; Michele Lempa; Robert D Burk Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2002-08-28 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Anil K Chaturvedi; Barry I Graubard; Tatevik Broutian; Robert K L Pickard; Zhen-Yue Tong; Weihong Xiao; Lisa Kahle; Maura L Gillison Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Maura L Gillison; Tatevik Broutian; Robert K L Pickard; Zhen-you Tong; Weihong Xiao; Lisa Kahle; Barry I Graubard; Anil K Chaturvedi Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Lauren Wilson; Michael Pawlita; Phillip E Castle; Tim Waterboer; Vikrant Sahasrabuddhe; Patti E Gravitt; Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Douglas M Herrin; Emily E Coates; Pamela J Costner; Troy J Kemp; Martha C Nason; Kapil K Saharia; Yuanji Pan; Uzma N Sarwar; Lasonji Holman; Galina Yamshchikov; Richard A Koup; Yuk Ying S Pang; Robert A Seder; John T Schiller; Barney S Graham; Ligia A Pinto; Julie E Ledgerwood Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2014 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Sara L Bissett; Anna Godi; Maxime J J Fleury; Antoine Touze; Clementina Cocuzza; Simon Beddows Journal: J Virol Date: 2015-05-20 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Daniel C Beachler; Raphael Viscidi; Elizabeth A Sugar; Howard Minkoff; Howard D Strickler; Ross D Cranston; Dorothy J Wiley; Lisa P Jacobson; Kathleen M Weber; Joseph B Margolick; Susheel Reddy; Maura L Gillison; Gypsyamber D'Souza Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Daniel C Beachler; Elizabeth A Sugar; Joseph B Margolick; Kathleen M Weber; Howard D Strickler; Dorothy J Wiley; Ross D Cranston; Robert D Burk; Howard Minkoff; Susheel Reddy; Weihong Xiao; Yingshi Guo; Maura L Gillison; Gypsyamber D'Souza Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Lauren E Wilson; Michael Pawlita; Phillip E Castle; Tim Waterboer; Vikrant Sahasrabuddhe; Patti E Gravitt; Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Tsung-Chieh Jane Fu; Joseph J Carter; James P Hughes; Qinghua Feng; Stephen E Hawes; Stephen M Schwartz; Long Fu Xi; Taylor Lasof; Joshua E Stern; Denise A Galloway; Laura A Koutsky; Rachel L Winer Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 7.396