Literature DB >> 19236279

The impact of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV; types 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like particle vaccine on infection and disease due to oncogenic nonvaccine HPV types in generally HPV-naive women aged 16-26 years.

Darron R Brown1, Susanne K Kjaer, Kristján Sigurdsson, Ole-Erik Iversen, Mauricio Hernandez-Avila, Cosette M Wheeler, Gonzalo Perez, Laura A Koutsky, Eng Hseon Tay, Patricía Garcia, Kevin A Ault, Suzanne M Garland, Sepp Leodolter, Sven-Eric Olsson, Grace W K Tang, Daron G Ferris, Jorma Paavonen, Marc Steben, F Xavier Bosch, Joakim Dillner, Elmar A Joura, Robert J Kurman, Slawomir Majewski, Nubia Muñoz, Evan R Myers, Luisa L Villa, Frank J Taddeo, Christine Roberts, Amha Tadesse, Janine Bryan, Lisa C Lupinacci, Katherine E D Giacoletti, Heather L Sings, Margaret James, Teresa M Hesley, Eliav Barr.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV)-6/11/16/18 vaccine reduces the risk of HPV-6/11/16/18-related cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1-3 or adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS). Here, its impact on CIN1-3/AIS associated with nonvaccine oncogenic HPV types was evaluated.
METHODS: We enrolled 17,622 women aged 16-26 years. All underwent cervicovaginal sampling and Pap testing at regular intervals for up to 4 years. HPV genotyping was performed for biopsy samples, and histological diagnoses were determined by a pathology panel. Analyses were conducted among subjects who were negative for 14 HPV types on day 1. Prespecified analyses included infection of 6 months' duration and CIN1-3/AIS due to the 2 and 5 most common HPV types in cervical cancer after HPV types 16 and 18, as well as all tested nonvaccine types.
RESULTS: Vaccination reduced the incidence of HPV-31/45 infection by 40.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.9% to 59.0%) and of CIN1-3/AIS by 43.6% (95% CI, 12.9% to 64.1%), respectively. The reduction in HPV-31/33/45/52/58 infection and CIN1-3/AIS was 25.0% (95% CI, 5.0% to 40.9%) and 29.2% (95% CI, 8.3% to 45.5%), respectively. Efficacy for CIN2-3/AIS associated with the 10 nonvaccine HPV types was 32.5% (95% CI, 6.0% to 51.9%). Reductions were most notable for HPV-31.
CONCLUSIONS: HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine reduced the risk of CIN2-3/AIS associated with nonvaccine types responsible for approximately 20% of cervical cancers. The clinical benefit of cross-protection is not expected to be fully additive to the efficacy already observed against HPV-6/11/16/18-related disease, because women may have >1 CIN lesion, each associated with a different HPV type. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00092521 , NCT00092534 , and NCT00092482.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19236279     DOI: 10.1086/597307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0022-1899            Impact factor:   5.226


  191 in total

1.  Selecting a mix of prevention strategies against cervical cancer for maximum efficiency with an optimization program.

Authors:  Nadia Demarteau; Thomas Breuer; Baudouin Standaert
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The value of HPV vaccination.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 3.  Vaccines to prevent infections by oncoviruses.

Authors:  John T Schiller; Douglas R Lowy
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 15.500

4.  Vaccination with multimeric L2 fusion protein and L1 VLP or capsomeres to broaden protection against HPV infection.

Authors:  Subhashini Jagu; Kihyuck Kwak; Robert L Garcea; Richard B S Roden
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Asian society of gynecologic oncology workshop 2010.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Suh; Jae Weon Kim; Mohamad Farid Aziz; Uma K Devi; Hextan Y S Ngan; Joo-Hyun Nam; Seung Cheol Kim; Tomoyasu Kato; Hee Sug Ryu; Shingo Fujii; Yoon Soon Lee; Jong Hyeok Kim; Tae-Joong Kim; Young Tae Kim; Kung-Liahng Wang; Taek Sang Lee; Kimio Ushijima; Sang-Goo Shin; Yin Nin Chia; Sarikapan Wilailak; Sang Yoon Park; Hidetaka Katabuchi; Toshiharu Kamura; Soon-Beom Kang
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Does the Syrian population have to wait for the new generation of human papillomaviruses vaccine?

Authors:  Ala-Eddin Al Moustafa; Amber Yasmeen; Lina Ghabreau; Nizar Akil
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Human papillomavirus in high-grade cervical lesions: Austrian data of a European multicentre study.

Authors:  Lucia Rössler; Olaf Reich; Reinhard Horvat; Sabrina Collas de Souza; Katsyarina Holl; Elmar A Joura
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  Comparison of the immunogenicity of Cervarix® and Gardasil® human papillomavirus vaccines for oncogenic non-vaccine serotypes HPV-31, HPV-33, and HPV-45 in HIV-infected adults.

Authors:  Lars Toft; Martin Tolstrup; Martin Müller; Peter Sehr; Jesper Bonde; Merete Storgaard; Lars Østergaard; Ole S Søgaard
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Integrating clinical, community, and policy perspectives on human papillomavirus vaccination.

Authors:  María E Fernández; Jennifer D Allen; Ritesh Mistry; Jessica A Kahn
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 21.981

10.  Virus-like particles and capsomeres are potent vaccines against cutaneous alpha HPVs.

Authors:  Tilo Senger; Lysann Schädlich; Sonja Textor; Corinna Klein; Kristina M Michael; Christopher B Buck; Lutz Gissmann
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 3.641

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.