Literature DB >> 20943296

Influence of asymmetry on the flexion relaxation response of the low back musculature.

Xiaopeng Ning1, Omid Haddad, Sangeun Jin, Gary A Mirka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: the flexion relaxation phenomenon has been extensively studied in sagittally symmetric postures. Knowledge about this phenomenon in asymmetric trunk postures is less well understood, and may help to reveal the underlying physiology of the passive tissue/active tissue load-sharing mechanism in the lumbar region.
METHODS: twelve participants performed fifteen controlled, full range trunk flexion-extension motions toward three asymmetric lifting postures (0° (sagittally symmetric), 15°, and 30° from the mid-sagittal plane). The electromyographic activity data from the paraspinals at the L3 and L4 levels and trunk kinematics data from motion sensors over the C7, T12 and S1 vertebrae were recorded. The lumbar flexion angles at which these muscles' activities were reduced to resting levels during forward flexion provided quantitative data describing the effects of asymmetry on the passive tissue/active tissue interaction.
FINDINGS: flexion relaxation was observed in the muscles contralateral to the direction of the asymmetric trunk flexion motion. The response of the ipsilateral extensor musculature was much less consistent, with many trials indicating that flexion relaxation was never achieved. Increasing asymmetry from 0° to 30° led to a 10% reduction in the maximum lumbar flexion. Lumbar flexion angles necessary to achieve flexion relaxation in the contralateral muscles also decreased (L4 paraspinal-related angle decreasing by 15% and the L3 paraspinal-related angle decreasing by 21%).
INTERPRETATION: under asymmetric conditions the lumbar flexion angle at which the transition from active muscle to passive ligamentous extension moment is altered from that seen in symmetric motions and this transition can have implications for the loading of the spine in full flexion (or near full flexion) postures. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20943296     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  7 in total

1.  Changes of lumbar posture and tissue loading during static trunk bending.

Authors:  Faisal Alessa; Xiaopeng Ning
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.161

2.  Effects of the weight configuration of hand load on trunk musculature during static weight holding.

Authors:  Saman Madinei; Xiaopeng Ning
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Comparison of the Symmetry of Right and Left Lateral Cervical Flexion and Rotation and the Cervical FRR in Young Computer Workers.

Authors:  Won-Gyu Yoo
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-05-29

4.  Effects of lumbar stabilization exercises on the flexion-relaxation phenomenon of the erector spinae.

Authors:  San-Seong Park; Bo-Ram Choi
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-06-28

5.  Upper thoracic spine mobilization and mobility exercise versus upper cervical spine mobilization and stabilization exercise in individuals with forward head posture: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Juchul Cho; Eunsang Lee; Seungwon Lee
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Trunk kinematics and low back pain during pruning among vineyard workers-A field study at the Chateau Larose-Trintaudon.

Authors:  Romain Balaguier; Pascal Madeleine; Kévin Rose-Dulcina; Nicolas Vuillerme
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of cognitive loading on lumbar flexion relaxation phenomenon in healthy people.

Authors:  Mohammad Pouretezad; Reza Salehi; Hossein Negahban; Mohammad Jafar Shaterzaedeh Yazdi; Mohammad Mehravar
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2018-06-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.