Literature DB >> 2094301

Global field power and topographic similarity.

W Skrandies1.   

Abstract

Multichannel recordings are commonly presented as topographic maps series displaying the change of the potential distribution over time. When reviewing a sequence of potential maps it becomes obvious that there are epochs with only little activity (few field lines; small extrema values) while at other times the fields display high peaks and deep troughs with steep gradients. The measure of global field power (GFP) corresponds to the spatial standard deviation, and it quantifies the amount of activity at each time point in the field considering the data from all recording electrodes simultaneously resulting in a reference-independent descriptor of the potential field. Global field power is plotted as a function of time, and the occurrence times of GFP maxima are used to determine the latencies of evoked potential components. The topographical change occurring in subsequent potential field distributions may also be quantified by computing an index of global dissimilarity. Global field power and global dissimilarity show a complementary behavior over time: in general, high GFP is associated with similar fields while during periods between GFP peaks the topographic patterns of successive field distributions change rapidly accompanied by high dissimilarity values. The topographic changes, however, are best recognized by a segmentation procedure that considers field structure independent of GFP and global dissimilarity. The principles and practical applications of GFP computation, component latency determination and global dissimilarity of potential field distributions as well as a topographical time segmentation procedure will be illustrated with multichannel data evoked by visual stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2094301     DOI: 10.1007/bf01128870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  8 in total

1.  Data reduction of multichannel fields: global field power and principal component analysis.

Authors:  W Skrandies
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1989 Fall-Winter       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Application of singular value decomposition to topographic analysis of flash-evoked potentials.

Authors:  R N Harner; S Riggio
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1989 Fall-Winter       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Segments of event-related potential map series reveal landscape changes with visual attention and subjective contours.

Authors:  D Brandeis; D Lehmann
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-12

4.  Time range analysis of evoked potential fields.

Authors:  W Skrandies
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields.

Authors:  D Lehmann; W Skrandies
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-06

6.  Automatic EEG analysis: a segmentation procedure based on the autocorrelation function.

Authors:  D Michael; J Houchin
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1979-02

7.  Spatial principal components of multichannel maps evoked by lateral visual half-field stimuli.

Authors:  W Skrandies; D Lehmann
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-12

8.  Significance probability mapping: an aid in the topographic analysis of brain electrical activity.

Authors:  F H Duffy; P H Bartels; J L Burchfiel
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-05
  8 in total
  79 in total

1.  Frequency domain models of the EEG.

Authors:  P Valdés; J Bosch; R Grave; J Hernandez; J Riera; R Pascual; R Biscay
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Electrophysiological responses to lateral shifts are not consistent with opponent-channel processing of interaural level differences.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins; Ann Clock Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Interplay of self-other distinction and cognitive control mechanisms in a social automatic imitation task: An ERP study.

Authors:  B Rauchbauer; C Lorenz; C Lamm; D M Pfabigan
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Refixation control in free viewing: a specialized mechanism divulged by eye-movement-related brain activity.

Authors:  Andrey R Nikolaev; Radha Nila Meghanathan; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The phonotactic influence on the perception of a consonant cluster /pt/ by native English and native Polish listeners: a behavioral and event related potential (ERP) study.

Authors:  Monica Wagner; Valerie L Shafer; Brett Martin; Mitchell Steinschneider
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Reduced temporal processing in older, normal-hearing listeners evident from electrophysiological responses to shifts in interaural time difference.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins; Ann C Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  EEG/EP: new techniques.

Authors:  W Skrandies
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Understanding actions of others: the electrodynamics of the left and right hemispheres. A high-density EEG neuroimaging study.

Authors:  Stephanie Ortigue; Corrado Sinigaglia; Giacomo Rizzolatti; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Facilitating neuronal connectivity analysis of evoked responses by exposing local activity with principal component analysis preprocessing: simulation of evoked MEG.

Authors:  Lin Gao; Tongsheng Zhang; Jue Wang; Julia Stephen
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  The evolution of a disparity decision in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Benoit R Cottereau; Justin M Ales; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.