Literature DB >> 20941740

Evaluation of oncogenic human papillomavirus RNA and DNA tests with liquid-based cytology in primary cervical cancer screening: the FASE study.

Joseph Monsonego1, Michael G Hudgens, Laurent Zerat, Jean-Claude Zerat, Kari Syrjänen, Philippe Halfon, Fabrice Ruiz, Jennifer S Smith.   

Abstract

The APTIMA HPV Assay (AHPV) allows detection of 14 high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) RNA types in cervical specimens. Until present, the assay has been compared to HPV DNA tests only in triage settings. Herein, we compare AHPV with a DNA assay (Hybrid Capture 2; HC2) and liquid-based cytology (LBC; using PreservCyt ThinPrep liquid Pap) in a screening setting (French APTIMA screening evaluation [FASE] study). Women (N = 5,006) aged 20-65 were screened by gynecologists in 17 private practices in Paris, France. One cervical specimen was collected and tested with LBC, AHPV and HC2 assays. Women were referred to colposcopy if they were ASC-US+ in LBC or HPV positive in either HPV assay. To control for verification bias, a random group (14%) with normal LBC and dually HPV negative tests underwent colposcopy. Data from 4,429 women were analyzed. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated for the three tests. AHPV and HC2 were highly sensitive for CIN2+ (92.0% and 96.7%) and CIN3+ (95.7% and 95.3%) detection and much more sensitive than LBC (69.1% for CIN2+ and 73.3% for CIN3+). Specificity of AHPV was higher than that of HC2, but similar to that of LBC (p < 0.001). Combining LBC with either HPV test slightly increased sensitivity but compromised specificity. AHPV assay is both specific and sensitive for the detection of high-grade precancerous lesions and may be considered as an option for routine cervical cancer screening for women over 20 years of age.
Copyright © 2010 UICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20941740     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  39 in total

Review 1.  Human Papillomavirus Laboratory Testing: the Changing Paradigm.

Authors:  Eileen M Burd
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Comparison of seven tests for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with abnormal smears: the Predictors 2 study.

Authors:  Anne Szarewski; David Mesher; Louise Cadman; Janet Austin; Lesley Ashdown-Barr; Linda Ho; George Terry; Stuart Liddle; Martin Young; Mark Stoler; Julie McCarthy; Corrina Wright; Christine Bergeron; W P Soutter; Deirdre Lyons; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  EUROGIN 2011 roadmap on prevention and treatment of HPV-related disease.

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Silvia de Sanjosé; Mona Saraiya; Mario Sideri; Joel Palefsky; Charles Lacey; Maura Gillison; Laia Bruni; Guglielmo Ronco; Nicolas Wentzensen; Julia Brotherton; You-Lin Qiao; Lynnette Denny; Jacob Bornstein; Laurent Abramowitz; Anna Giuliano; Massimo Tommasino; Joseph Monsonego
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Comparative evaluation of three commercial systems for detection of high-risk human papillomavirus in cervical and vaginal ThinPrep PreservCyt samples and correlation with biopsy results.

Authors:  M J Binnicker; B S Pritt; B J Duresko; M J Espy; T E Grys; M A Zarka; S E Kerr; M R Henry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  A new method to address verification bias in studies of clinical screening tests: cervical cancer screening assays as an example.

Authors:  Xiaonan Xue; Mimi Y Kim; Philip E Castle; Howard D Strickler
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Effect of preanalytical processing of ThinPrep specimens on detection of high-risk human papillomavirus by the Aptima HPV assay.

Authors:  Erik Munson; Elizabeth R Schroeder; Kevin C Ross; Connie Yauck; Theresa Bieganski; Robert D Amrhein; Maureen Napierala; April L Harkins
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Optimizing technology for cervical cancer screening in high-resource settings.

Authors:  Lyndsay A Richardson; Joseph Tota; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-05

8.  A comparison of human papillomavirus genotype-specific DNA and E6/E7 mRNA detection to identify anal precancer among HIV-infected men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Stephen Follansbee; Sylvia Borgonovo; Diane Tokugawa; Lauren M Schwartz; Thomas S Lorey; Brandon LaMere; Julia C Gage; Barbara Fetterman; Teresa M Darragh; Ana Cecilia Rodriguez; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  HPV-based Tests for Cervical Cancer Screening and Management of Cervical Disease.

Authors:  Patricia Luhn; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep       Date:  2013-06-01

10.  Comparison of commercial hybridization and automated transcription-mediated amplification modalities for detection of high-risk human papillomavirus nucleic acid.

Authors:  Erik Munson; Lynn Kroeger; Sandra Balzer; Robert Amrhein; Kimber L Munson; Maureen Napierala; Richard Hudspeth; Patrick J Dillon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.