Literature DB >> 20941694

[Current treatment concepts for mid-shaft fractures of the clavicle - results of a prospective multicentre study].

J Böhme1, A Bonk, G O Bacher, A Wilharm, R Hoffmann, C Josten.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mid-shaft clavicular fractures are mainly treated conservatively with an average incidence of non-union in 4.5 %. Gender, age, grade of fragment dislocation and comminution are risk factors to develop a pseudarthrosis. In contrast to patients who where operated on, conservative treatment was also associated with a higher complication rate and pain level as well as a poor shoulder function and cosmetic result. Therefore more patients are treated operatively, especially modern minimally invasive techniques have been developed and remain as equals to the standard plate fixation. PATIENTS/MATERIAL: Within a period of 24 months patients with a mid-shaft clavicular fracture were included into a prospective, non-randomised multicentre study. A modified AO classification was used. Patients were treated either conservatively, by plating or intramedullary nailing. Pain level, cosmetic result, shoulder function and complication rate were documented as well as the influence of the profession on the therapeutic strategy and duration of unfitness for work.
RESULTS: 120 patients (95 male, 25 female) were included in the study. Fractures were caused in 35 (29 %) by a direct, in 85 (71 %) by an indirect trauma mechanism. Because of their lower grade fractures with overlapping fragments 47 (39 %) patients were treated conservatively with a figure-of-eight-bandage. Patients with higher graded fractures and fragment displacement were stabilised either by intramedullary nailing (n = 20, 27 %) or plate fixation (n = 53, 73 %). 96 (80 %) patients were examined at a follow-up of eight weeks and eight months after injury. Early freedom from pain (p = 0.014), a better cosmetic result (p = 0.1) and an improved subjective (p = 0.004) and objective (p = 0.01) shoulder function were statistically significant in operated patients. Clavicle shortening was often found to be significant in conservatively treated patients (p = 0.006). Duration of unfitness for work depended on the physical activity in the job. The complication rate was 15 % for each therapy, non-union was detected in one (0.8 %) patient.
CONCLUSION: Mid-shaft clavicular fractures have to be classified by the criteria contact and number of fragments. Advantages of operative procedures are early freedom from pain and shoulder function recovery. Non-displaced low grade shaft fractures without shortening should be treated conservatively, whereas displaced low-grade shaft fractures have a better result after intramedullary nailing. Plate fixation should be predominantly used in dislocated and comminuted fractures as well as in patients with a high level of physical activity in their jobs. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20941694     DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1250334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall        ISSN: 1864-6697            Impact factor:   0.923


  13 in total

1.  [Injury to the upper limbs and prevention in equestrian sports].

Authors:  C Schröter; M Bielefeld; D Bielefeld; C Macke; C Winkelmann; P Mommsen; C Krettek; C Zeckey
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures : a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials].

Authors:  D Stengel
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  Systematic review of complications after intramedullary fixation for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

Authors:  Frans-Jasper G Wijdicks; R M Houwert; Peter J Millett; Egbert J J M Verleisdonk; Olivier A J Van der Meijden
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Grade outcomes or studies: how to use grade approach correctly.

Authors:  Frans-Jasper Wijdicks
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Operative versus non-operative treatment for clavicle fracture: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guo-dong Liu; Song-lin Tong; Shan Ou; Le-shun Zhou; Jun Fei; Guo-xin Nan; Jian-wen Gu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The challenge of nonunion after osteosynthesis of the clavicle: is it a biomechanical or infection problem?

Authors:  Giuseppe Rollo; Paolo Pichierri; Antonio Marsilio; Marco Filipponi; Michele Bisaccia; Luigi Meccariello
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2017-12-27

Review 7.  Systematic review of the complications of plate fixation of clavicle fractures.

Authors:  Frans-Jasper G Wijdicks; Olivier A J Van der Meijden; Peter J Millett; Egbert J M M Verleisdonk; R Marijn Houwert
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 8.  Operative and nonoperative treatment of clavicle fractures in adults.

Authors:  Kaisa J Virtanen; Antti O V Malmivaara; Ville M Remes; Mika P Paavola
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 9.  Plate fixation versus intramedullary fixation for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  R Marijn Houwert; Frans-Jasper Wijdicks; Charlotte Steins Bisschop; Egbert-Jan Verleisdonk; Moyo Kruyt
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Intramedullary fixation of diaphyseal clavicle fractures using the rockwood clavicle pin: review of 86 cases.

Authors:  William J Marlow; Peter Ralte; Syam Pk Morapudi; Rashpal Bassi; Jochen Fischer; Mohammad Waseem
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2012-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.