Literature DB >> 20941647

What is the role of serological testing between stages of two-stage reconstruction of the infected prosthetic knee?

Sharat K Kusuma1, Joseph Ward, Marc Jacofsky, Scott M Sporer, Craig J Della Valle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two-stage exchange arthroplasty is the gold standard for treatment of infected TKA. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and synovial fluid white blood cell (WBC) count with differential are often used to determine treatment response; however, it is unclear whether these tests can answer the critical question of whether joint sepsis has been controlled between stages and if reimplantation is indicated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore asked if (1) these serologies respond between stage one explantation and stage two reimplantation during two-stage knee reconstruction for infection; and (2) changes in the values of these serologies are predictive of resolution of joint infection.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the serologies of 76 infected patients treated with a two-stage exchange protocol. The ESR, CRP, and aspiration were repeated a minimum of 2 weeks following antibiotic cessation and prior to second stage reoperation. Comparisons were made to identify trends in these serologies between the first and second stage procedures.
RESULTS: Eight knees (12%) were persistently infected at the time of second stage reoperation. The ESR remained persistently elevated in 37 knees (54%), and the CRP remained elevated in 14 knees (21%) where infection had been controlled. We were unable to identify an optimum cutoff value for the ESR, CRP, or the two combined. The best test for confirmation of infection control was the synovial fluid WBC count.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the ESR, CRP, and synovial fluid WBC counts decreased in cases of infection control, these values frequently remained elevated. We were unable to identify any patterns in these tests indicative of persistent infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20941647      PMCID: PMC3048278          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1619-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of preoperative cultures before second-stage reimplantation of a total knee prosthesis complicated by infection. A comparison-group study.

Authors:  M A Mont; B J Waldman; D S Hungerford
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Prospective analysis of preoperative and intraoperative investigations for the diagnosis of infection at the sites of two hundred and two revision total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  M J Spangehl; B A Masri; J X O'Connell; C P Duncan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Analysis of frozen sections of intraoperative specimens obtained at the time of reoperation after hip or knee resection arthroplasty for the treatment of infection.

Authors:  C J Della Valle; E Bogner; P Desai; J H Lonner; E Adler; J D Zuckerman; P E Di Cesare
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Mid-term to long-term followup of two-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Abdul A Haleem; Daniel J Berry; Arlen D Hanssen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Articulating versus static spacers in revision total knee arthroplasty for sepsis. The Ranawat Award.

Authors:  T K Fehring; S Odum; T F Calton; J B Mason
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Two-stage exchange hip arthroplasty for deep infection.

Authors:  J Lin; X Yang; M P Bostrom
Journal:  J Chemother       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.714

7.  Results of treatment of infection in both knees after bilateral total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Luther H Wolff; Javad Parvizi; Robert T Trousdale; Mark W Pagnano; Douglas R Osmon; Arlen D Hanssen; George J Haidukewych
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Patient satisfaction and functional status after treatment of infection at the site of a total knee arthroplasty with use of the PROSTALAC articulating spacer.

Authors:  R M Dominic Meek; Bassam A Masri; David Dunlop; Donald S Garbuz; Nelson V Greidanus; Robert McGraw; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Synovial fluid leukocyte count and differential for the diagnosis of prosthetic knee infection.

Authors:  Andrej Trampuz; Arlen D Hanssen; Douglas R Osmon; Jayawant Mandrekar; James M Steckelberg; Robin Patel
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  The role of intraoperative frozen sections in revision total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  D S Feldman; J H Lonner; P Desai; J D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  48 in total

1.  Are Frozen Sections and MSIS Criteria Reliable at the Time of Reimplantation of Two-stage Revision Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Jaiben George; Grzegorz Kwiecien; Alison K Klika; Deepak Ramanathan; Thomas W Bauer; Wael K Barsoum; Carlos A Higuera
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Treatment algorithm for periprosthetic infections of the knee joint].

Authors:  C Lüring; S W Lemmen; V Quack; J Beckmann; M Tingart; B Rath
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Preoperative aspiration culture for preoperative diagnosis of infection in total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Xinhua Qu; Zanjing Zhai; Chuanlong Wu; Fangchun Jin; Haowei Li; Lei Wang; Guangwang Liu; Xuqiang Liu; Wengang Wang; Huiwu Li; Xiaoyu Zhang; Zhenan Zhu; Kerong Dai
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Does Change in ESR and CRP Guide the Timing of Two-stage Arthroplasty Reimplantation?

Authors:  Jeffrey B Stambough; Brian M Curtin; Susan M Odum; Michael B Cross; J Ryan Martin; Thomas K Fehring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Prosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Ryan S Charette; Christopher M Melnic
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09

6.  CORR Insights®: Sonication of antibiotic spacers predicts failure during two-stage revision for prosthetic knee and hip infections.

Authors:  Charalampos G Zalavras
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  CORR Insights(®): Synovial Cytokines and the MSIS Criteria Are Not Useful for Determining Infection Resolution After Periprosthetic Joint Infection Explantation.

Authors:  Elie Berbari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  What is the Diagnostic Accuracy of Aspirations Performed on Hips With Antibiotic Cement Spacers?

Authors:  Jared M Newman; Jaiben George; Alison K Klika; Stephen F Hatem; Wael K Barsoum; W Trevor North; Carlos A Higuera
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Synovial Alpha-defensin at Reimplantation in Two-stage Revision Arthroplasty to Rule Out Persistent Infection.

Authors:  Charlotte Bielefeld; Harald Engler; Marcus JÄger; Alexander Wegner; Dennis Wassenaar; Andre Busch
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  Prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Saima Aslam; Rabih O Darouiche
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.