Literature DB >> 11936381

Two-stage exchange hip arthroplasty for deep infection.

J Lin1, X Yang, M P Bostrom.   

Abstract

Although the risk of infection after total hip arthroplasty has decreased over the last three decades with the use of prophylactic antibiotics, laminar airflow operating rooms and whole-body exhaust suites, deep infection after total hip arthroplasty remains a serious complication. Significant morbidity to the patient and the cost to the health care system remain. During this period of time, diagnostic techniques also have improved including the use of polymerase chain reaction amplification. Treatment options now include: suppressive antibiotics, irrigation and debridement with retention of components, one-stage reimplantation, two-stage reimplantation, and salvage procedures. Based on the medical literature, the successful eradication of a total joint replacement infection with a two-stage reimplantation protocol is over 90% while the success rate with a one-stage protocol is approximately 80%. These success rates may decline however as the prevalence of antibiotic resistant organisms increases. Current controversies regarding two-stage reimplantation protocols include: duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy, timing of the reimplantation, the use of allograft bone in the reconstruction, the choice of fixation (cement versus cementless), and the use of antibiotic-loaded cement spacers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11936381     DOI: 10.1179/joc.2001.13.Supplement-2.54

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chemother        ISSN: 1120-009X            Impact factor:   1.714


  7 in total

1.  What is the role of serological testing between stages of two-stage reconstruction of the infected prosthetic knee?

Authors:  Sharat K Kusuma; Joseph Ward; Marc Jacofsky; Scott M Sporer; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Chronic infections in hip arthroplasties: comparing risk of reinfection following one-stage and two-stage revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeppe Lange; Anders Troelsen; Reimar W Thomsen; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 4.790

3.  Innovative antimicrobial coating of titanium implants with iodine.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tsuchiya; Toshiharu Shirai; Hideji Nishida; Hideki Murakami; Tamon Kabata; Norio Yamamoto; Koji Watanabe; Junsuke Nakase
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 1.601

4.  Staged custom, intramedullary antibiotic spacers for severe segmental bone loss in infected total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Atul F Kamath; Okechukwu Anakwenze; Gwo-Chin Lee; Charles L Nelson
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2011-08-17

Review 5.  Two-stage procedure in the treatment of late chronic hip infections--spacer implantation.

Authors:  Mohamed Sukeik; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Treatment failure among infected periprosthetic total hip arthroplasty patients.

Authors:  Ran Schwarzkopf; Bassem Mikhael; Elizabeth Wright; Daniel M Estok; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2014-05-30

7.  The use of augmented antibiotic-loaded cement spacer in periprosthetic joint infection patients with acetabular bone defect.

Authors:  Jun Fu; Yi Xiang; Ming Ni; Jiying Chen; Xiang Li; Baozhan Yu; Kan Liu; Yonggang Zhou; Libo Hao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.359

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.