Literature DB >> 20939375

A comparison of aboveground and belowground populations of Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquitoes in Chicago, Illinois, and New York City, New York, using microsatellites.

Linda Kothera1, Marvin Godsey, John-Paul Mutebi, Harry M Savage.   

Abstract

Aboveground and belowground populations of the mosquito Culex pipiens L. are traditionally classified as form pipiens and form molestus, respectively, and gene flow between forms is thought to be limited. Relatively few f. molestus populations have been found in the United States, which has hindered their study in North America. In this study, we used microsatellites to characterize a newly discovered population of f. molestus in Chicago, IL, and compared levels of genetic diversity and differentiation in aboveground and belowground populations from Chicago and New York City, NY. Levels of genetic diversity, as measured by expected heterozygosity and allelic richness, were markedly lower in both f. molestus populations. Allele frequencies were distinctly different between the two f. molestus populations, and some alleles were present in one belowground population and not the other. Pairwise F(ST) values between populations indicated that f. molestus populations were highly divergent from each other, as well as from their associated aboveground populations. Cluster analysis suggested the most likely number of groups was three, with the four f. pipiens populations in one cluster, and each of the f. molestus populations in its own cluster. Admixture analysis detected a low number of hybrids, 8%, between forms. We also tested the efficacy of two assays purported to distinguish between the forms, the CQ11 assay and a restriction fragment-length polymorphism assay of the COI gene, and found neither assay reliable in this regard. Our findings support the hypothesis that f. molestus populations in Chicago and New York City arose from local aboveground populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20939375     DOI: 10.1603/me10031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Entomol        ISSN: 0022-2585            Impact factor:   2.278


  27 in total

1.  Evaluation of a stable isotope method to mark naturally-breeding larval mosquitoes for adult dispersal studies.

Authors:  Gabriel L Hamer; Danielle J Donovan; Rebecca Hood-Nowotny; Michael G Kaufman; Tony L Goldberg; Edward D Walker
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.278

2.  Phenotypic variation among Culex pipiens complex (Diptera: Culicidae) populations from the Sacramento Valley, California: horizontal and vertical transmission of West Nile virus, diapause potential, autogeny, and host selection.

Authors:  Brittany M Nelms; Linda Kothera; Tara Thiemann; Paula A Macedo; Harry M Savage; William K Reisen
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  Reexamination of Culex pipiens hybridization zone in the Eastern United States by ribosomal DNA-based single nucleotide polymorphism markers.

Authors:  Shaoming Huang; Goudarz Molaei; Theodore G Andreadis
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.345

4.  QTL Determining Diel Flight Activity in Male Culex pipiens Mosquitoes.

Authors:  Paul V Hickner; Akio Mori; Samuel S C Rund; Aaron D Sheppard; Joanne M Cunningham; Dave D Chadee; Giles E Duffield; David W Severson
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.645

5.  Complexity of the Culex pipiens complex in California.

Authors:  L Kothera; B Nelms; H M Savage; W K Reisen
Journal:  Proc Pap Annu Conf Mosq Vector Control Assoc Calif       Date:  2012-11

6.  Generation of a Lineage II Powassan Virus (Deer Tick Virus) cDNA Clone: Assessment of Flaviviral Genetic Determinants of Tick and Mosquito Vector Competence.

Authors:  Joan L Kenney; Michael Anishchenko; Meghan Hermance; Hannah Romo; Ching-I Chen; Saravanan Thangamani; Aaron C Brault
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 2.133

7.  Diversity of Wolbachia pipientis strain wPip in a genetically admixtured, above-ground Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) population: association with form molestus ancestry and host selection patterns.

Authors:  Rebecca J Morningstar; Gabriel L Hamer; Tony L Goldberg; Shaoming Huang; Theodore G Andreadis; Edward D Walker
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.278

8.  Transcript Assembly and Quantification by RNA-Seq Reveals Significant Differences in Gene Expression and Genetic Variants in Mosquitoes of the Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) Complex.

Authors:  David S Kang; Sungshil Kim; Michael A Cotten; Cheolho Sim
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 2.278

9.  A comparison of above-ground and below-ground populations of Culex pipiens pipiens in Chicago, Illinois, and New York City, New York, using 2 microsatellite assays.

Authors:  Linda Kothera; Marvin Godsey; John-Paul Mutebi; Harry M Savage
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.917

10.  Comparative Vector Competence of North American Culex pipiens and Culex quinquefasciatus for African and European Lineage 2 West Nile Viruses.

Authors:  Hannah Romo; Anna Papa; Rebekah Kading; Rebecca Clark; Mark Delorey; Aaron C Brault
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.345

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.