| Literature DB >> 20938974 |
Christian T Stoeck1, Peng Hu, Dana C Peters, Kraig V Kissinger, Beth Goddu, Lois Goepfert, Long Ngo, Warren J Manning, Sebastian Kozerke, Reza Nezafat.
Abstract
Magnetization transfer contrast has been used commonly for endogenous tissue contrast improvements in angiography, brain, body, and cardiac imaging. Both off-resonant and on-resonant RF pulses can be used to generate magnetization transfer based contrast. In this study, on-resonant magnetization transfer preparation using binomial pulses were optimized and compared with off-resonant magnetization transfer for imaging of coronary veins. Three parameters were studied with simulations and in vivo measurements: flip angle, pulse repetitions, and binomial pulse order. Subsequently, first or second order binomial on-resonant magnetization transfer pulses with eight repetitions of 720° and 240° flip angle were used for coronary vein MRI. Flip angles of 720° yielded contrast enhancement of 115% (P < 0.0006) for first order on-resonant and 95% (P < 0.0006) for off-resonant magnetization transfer. There was no statistically significance difference between off-resonant and on-resonant first order binomial Magnetization transfer at 720°. However, for off-resonance pulses, much more preparation time is needed when compared with the binomials but with considerably reduced specific absorption rate.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20938974 PMCID: PMC2992077 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22581
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Magn Reson Med ISSN: 0740-3194 Impact factor: 4.668