BACKGROUND: Pharmacist-physician comanagement of hypertension has been shown to improve office blood pressures (BPs). We sought to describe the effect of such a model on 24-hour ambulatory BPs. METHODS: We performed a prospective, cluster-randomized, controlled clinical trial, enrolling 179 patients with uncontrolled hypertension from 5 primary care clinics in Iowa City, Iowa. Patients were randomized by clinic to receive pharmacist-physician collaborative management of hypertension (intervention) or usual care (control) for a 9-month period. In the intervention group, pharmacists helped patients to identify barriers to BP control, counseled on lifestyle and dietary modifications, and adjusted antihypertensive therapy in collaboration with the patients' primary care providers. Patients were seen by pharmacists a minimum of every 2 months. Ambulatory BP was measured at baseline and at study end. RESULTS: Baseline and end-of-study ambulatory BP profiles were evaluated for 175 patients. Mean (SD) ambulatory systolic BPs (SBPs), reported in millimeters of mercury, were reduced more in the intervention group than in the control group: daytime change in (Δ) SBP, 15.2 (11.5) vs 5.5 (13.5) (P < .001); nighttime ΔSBP, 12.2 (14.8) vs 3.4 (13.3) (P < .001); and 24-hour ΔSBP, 14.1 (11.3) vs 5.5 (12.5) (P < .001). More patients in the intervention group than in the control group had their BP controlled at the end of the study (75.0% vs 50.7%) (P < .001), as defined by overall 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring. CONCLUSION: Pharmacist-physician collaborative management of hypertension achieved consistent and significantly greater reduction in 24-hour BP and a high rate of BP control. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00201045.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Pharmacist-physician comanagement of hypertension has been shown to improve office blood pressures (BPs). We sought to describe the effect of such a model on 24-hour ambulatory BPs. METHODS: We performed a prospective, cluster-randomized, controlled clinical trial, enrolling 179 patients with uncontrolled hypertension from 5 primary care clinics in Iowa City, Iowa. Patients were randomized by clinic to receive pharmacist-physician collaborative management of hypertension (intervention) or usual care (control) for a 9-month period. In the intervention group, pharmacists helped patients to identify barriers to BP control, counseled on lifestyle and dietary modifications, and adjusted antihypertensive therapy in collaboration with the patients' primary care providers. Patients were seen by pharmacists a minimum of every 2 months. Ambulatory BP was measured at baseline and at study end. RESULTS: Baseline and end-of-study ambulatory BP profiles were evaluated for 175 patients. Mean (SD) ambulatory systolic BPs (SBPs), reported in millimeters of mercury, were reduced more in the intervention group than in the control group: daytime change in (Δ) SBP, 15.2 (11.5) vs 5.5 (13.5) (P < .001); nighttime ΔSBP, 12.2 (14.8) vs 3.4 (13.3) (P < .001); and 24-hour ΔSBP, 14.1 (11.3) vs 5.5 (12.5) (P < .001). More patients in the intervention group than in the control group had their BP controlled at the end of the study (75.0% vs 50.7%) (P < .001), as defined by overall 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring. CONCLUSION: Pharmacist-physician collaborative management of hypertension achieved consistent and significantly greater reduction in 24-hour BP and a high rate of BP control. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00201045.
Authors: Denis L Clement; Marc L De Buyzere; Dirk A De Bacquer; Peter W de Leeuw; Daniel A Duprez; Robert H Fagard; Peter J Gheeraert; Luc H Missault; Jacob J Braun; Roland O Six; Patricia Van Der Niepen; Eoin O'Brien Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-06-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J A Staessen; L Thijs; R Fagard; E T O'Brien; D Clement; P W de Leeuw; G Mancia; C Nachev; P Palatini; G Parati; J Tuomilehto; J Webster Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-08-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ross D Feldman; Guang Y Zou; Margaret K Vandervoort; Cindy J Wong; Sigrid A E Nelson; Brian G Feagan Journal: Hypertension Date: 2009-02-23 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Shannon J Von Muenster; Barry L Carter; Cynthia A Weber; Michael E Ernst; Jessica L Milchak; Jennifer J G Steffensmeier; Yinghui Xu Journal: Pharm World Sci Date: 2007-08-21
Authors: Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella Journal: Hypertension Date: 2003-12-01 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Beverly B Green; Andrea J Cook; James D Ralston; Paul A Fishman; Sheryl L Catz; James Carlson; David Carrell; Lynda Tyll; Eric B Larson; Robert S Thompson Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-06-25 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Manuel Gorostidi; Javier Sobrino; Julián Segura; Cristina Sierra; Alex de la Sierra; Raquel Hernández del Rey; Ernest Vinyoles; Josep M Galcerán; María D López-Eady; Rafael Marín; José R Banegas; Antonio Sarría; Antonio Coca; Luis M Ruilope Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Barry L Carter; George R Bergus; Jeffrey D Dawson; Karen B Farris; William R Doucette; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Arthur J Hartz Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Amy G Huebschmann; Trina Mizrahi; Alyssa Soenksen; Brenda L Beaty; Thomas D Denberg Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2012-03-16 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: David Margolius; Thomas Bodenheimer; Heather Bennett; Jennifer Wong; Victoria Ngo; Guillermo Padilla; David H Thom Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2012 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Robert B Schonberger; Jessica Feinleib; Natalie Holt; Feng Dai; Cynthia Brandt; Matthew M Burg Journal: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 2.628
Authors: Krista K Proia; Anilkrishna B Thota; Gibril J Njie; Ramona K C Finnie; David P Hopkins; Qaiser Mukhtar; Nicolaas P Pronk; Donald Zeigler; Thomas E Kottke; Kimberly J Rask; Daniel T Lackland; Joy F Brooks; Lynne T Braun; Tonya Cooksey Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-06-02 Impact factor: 5.043