Literature DB >> 20937564

³He lung morphometry technique: accuracy analysis and pulse sequence optimization.

A L Sukstanskii1, M S Conradi, D A Yablonskiy.   

Abstract

The (3)He lung morphometry technique (Yablonskiy et al., JAP, 2009), based on MRI measurements of hyperpolarized gas diffusion in lung airspaces, provides unique information on the lung microstructure at the alveolar level. 3D tomographic images of standard morphological parameters (mean airspace chord length, lung parenchyma surface-to-volume ratio, and the number of alveoli per unit lung volume) can be created from a rather short (several seconds) MRI scan. These parameters are most commonly used to characterize lung morphometry but were not previously available from in vivo studies. A background of the (3)He lung morphometry technique is based on a previously proposed model of lung acinar airways, treated as cylindrical passages of external radius R covered by alveolar sleeves of depth h, and on a theory of gas diffusion in these airways. The initial works approximated the acinar airways as very long cylinders, all with the same R and h. The present work aims at analyzing effects of realistic acinar airway structures, incorporating airway branching, physiological airway lengths, a physiological ratio of airway ducts and sacs, and distributions of R and h. By means of Monte-Carlo computer simulations, we demonstrate that our technique allows rather accurate measurements of geometrical and morphological parameters of acinar airways. In particular, the accuracy of determining one of the most important physiological parameter of lung parenchyma - surface-to-volume ratio - does not exceed several percent. Second, we analyze the effect of the susceptibility induced inhomogeneous magnetic field on the parameter estimate and demonstrate that this effect is rather negligible at B(0) ≤ 3T and becomes substantial only at higher B(0) Third, we theoretically derive an optimal choice of MR pulse sequence parameters, which should be used to acquire a series of diffusion-attenuated MR signals, allowing a substantial decrease in the acquisition time and improvement in accuracy of the results. It is demonstrated that the optimal choice represents three not equidistant b-values: b(1)=0, b(2)∼2 s/cm(2), b(3)∼8 s/cm(2).
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20937564      PMCID: PMC2993856          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2010.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson        ISSN: 1090-7807            Impact factor:   2.229


  17 in total

1.  The number of alveoli in the human lung.

Authors:  Matthias Ochs; Jens R Nyengaard; Anja Jung; Lars Knudsen; Marion Voigt; Thorsten Wahlers; Joachim Richter; Hans Jørgen G Gundersen
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-09-25       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 2.  MRI of the lungs using hyperpolarized noble gases.

Authors:  Harald E Möller; X Josette Chen; Brian Saam; Klaus D Hagspiel; G Allan Johnson; Talissa A Altes; Eduard E de Lange; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Experimental investigation and numerical simulation of 3He gas diffusion in simple geometries: implications for analytical models of 3He MR lung morphometry.

Authors:  J Parra-Robles; S Ajraoui; M H Deppe; S R Parnell; J M Wild
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 4.  What makes a good lung?

Authors:  Ewald R Weibel
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 2.193

5.  In vivo lung morphometry with hyperpolarized 3He diffusion MRI in canines with induced emphysema: disease progression and comparison with computed tomography.

Authors:  Tariq S K Tanoli; Jason C Woods; Mark S Conradi; Kyongtae Ty Bae; David S Gierada; James C Hogg; Joel D Cooper; Dmitriy A Yablonskiy
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2006-07-27

6.  An official research policy statement of the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society: standards for quantitative assessment of lung structure.

Authors:  Connie C W Hsia; Dallas M Hyde; Matthias Ochs; Ewald R Weibel
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 21.405

7.  Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jens H Jensen; Joseph A Helpern; Anita Ramani; Hanzhang Lu; Kyle Kaczynski
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  Theoretical models of the diffusion weighted MR signal.

Authors:  Dmitriy A Yablonskiy; Alexander L Sukstanskii
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Quantitative in vivo assessment of lung microstructure at the alveolar level with hyperpolarized 3He diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Dmitriy A Yablonskiy; Alexander L Sukstanskii; Jason C Leawoods; David S Gierada; G Larry Bretthorst; Stephen S Lefrak; Joel D Cooper; Mark S Conradi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Quantitative assessment of lung microstructure in healthy mice using an MR-based 3He lung morphometry technique.

Authors:  E Osmanagic; A L Sukstanskii; J D Quirk; J C Woods; R A Pierce; M S Conradi; E R Weibel; D A Yablonskiy
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-08-26
View more
  10 in total

1.  In vivo detection of acinar microstructural changes in early emphysema with (3)He lung morphometry.

Authors:  James D Quirk; Barbara A Lutey; David S Gierada; Jason C Woods; Robert M Senior; Stephen S Lefrak; Alexander L Sukstanskii; Mark S Conradi; Dmitriy A Yablonskiy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  In vivo lung morphometry with hyperpolarized (3) He diffusion MRI: reproducibility and the role of diffusion-sensitizing gradient direction.

Authors:  James D Quirk; Yulin V Chang; Dmitriy A Yablonskiy
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Probing lung microstructure with hyperpolarized 3He gradient echo MRI.

Authors:  Alexander L Sukstanskii; James D Quirk; Dmitriy A Yablonskiy
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  In vivo lung morphometry with accelerated hyperpolarized (3) He diffusion MRI: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Yulin V Chang; James D Quirk; Dmitriy A Yablonskiy
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Lung morphometry with hyperpolarized 129Xe: theoretical background.

Authors:  A L Sukstanskii; D A Yablonskiy
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Commentary on "The influence of lung airways branching structure and diffusion time on measurements and models of short-range 3He gas MR diffusion".

Authors:  Dmitriy A Yablonskiy; Alexander L Sukstanskii; Mark S Conradi
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Regional anisotropy of airspace orientation in the lung as assessed with hyperpolarized helium-3 diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Peter Komlosi; Talissa A Altes; Kun Qing; Karen E Mooney; G Wilson Miller; Jaime F Mata; Eduard E de Lange; William A Tobias; Gordon D Cates; James R Brookeman; John P Mugler
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  Diffusion lung imaging with hyperpolarized gas MRI.

Authors:  Dmitriy A Yablonskiy; Alexander L Sukstanskii; James D Quirk
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 9.  Perspectives of hyperpolarized noble gas MRI beyond 3He.

Authors:  David M L Lilburn; Galina E Pavlovskaya; Thomas Meersmann
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  Pulmonary MRI contrast using Surface Quadrupolar Relaxation (SQUARE) of hyperpolarized (83)Kr.

Authors:  Joseph S Six; Theodore Hughes-Riley; David M L Lilburn; Alan C Dorkes; Karl F Stupic; Dominick E Shaw; Peter G Morris; Ian P Hall; Galina E Pavlovskaya; Thomas Meersmann
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 2.546

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.