| Literature DB >> 20937321 |
Jenn-Fa Liou1, Chih-Wei Chang, Jui-jane Tailiu, Chun-Keung Yu, Huan-Yao Lei, Lih-Ren Chen, Chein Tai.
Abstract
The objective of this study is to evaluate the passive protective efficiency of immunoglobulin in yolk (IgY) specific against human enterovirus type 71 (EV71). The antibody was raised by intramuscular immunization to 10 White Leghorn hens, with inactivated human EV71 serving as the antigen. The titer and specificity of the antibody were analyzed from purified IgY in the egg yolks of immunized hens. Results indicate that the titer of IgY specific against EV71 increased from the third week after the first immunization. The content of total IgY was 190 ± 26 mg/yolk, with an average concentration of specific IgY of 6.34 ± 3.38 mg/yolk in the eggs from 3 to 18 wk after immunization. The results of the neutralization effect of specific IgY in EV71-challenged mice demonstrate that the EV71-specific IgY, either by intraperitoneal injection or oral administration, was able to significantly reduce the morbidity and mortality in EV71 infected mice pups.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20937321 PMCID: PMC7115624 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.09.089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vaccine ISSN: 0264-410X Impact factor: 3.641
Purity of IgY after different procedure of purification.
| Purification step | Total protein (mg/egg) | IgY (mg/egg) | Purity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water soluble solution (WSF) | 595 ± 37 | 190 ± 26 | 32 ± 6 |
| Ultrafiltration | 231 ± 25 | 151 ± 21 | 65 ± 5 |
The value was derived from the concentration of the water soluble fraction (WSF), based on an average WSF of 150 ml per egg from all chicken eggs between 3 and 18 weeks, was mean as average ± SD.
Fig. 1The content of EV71 specific IgY per egg yolk during the immunization period. Values are shown as average data from eggs in the same week for all immunized chickens. Vertical bars indicate the standard deviation.
Fig. 2(A) The transfection of EV71 on RD cells showing the cytopathic effect (CPE). (B) RD cells showed no CPE if anti-EV71 IgY was mixed with EV71 for 2 h, indicated virus neutralization. Scale site shows 100 μm at 100×.
Fig. 3Western blot analysis of anti-EV71 IgY. (A) SDS-PAGE profiles of EV71 (lane 1: EV71 virus, lane 2: molecular maker) and (B) Western blotting analysis of the immunoreactivity of anti-EV71 IgY. The EV71 was run SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose filter and probe with anti-EV71 IgY and non-immunized IgY (lane 1: molecular maker; lane 2: anti-EV71 IgY 1:1000 dilution: lane 3: anti-EV71 IgY 1:3000 dilution; lane 4: non-immunized IgY).
Fig. 4ICR mice showed both limb paralysis and abnormal hair growth after EV71 challenge in the IP model. (A) Mouse of 8 dpi. (B) Body weight difference between an EV71 infected mouse (left) and anti-EV71 IgY treated mice (right) on 8 dpi at the same cage.
Effects of IP challenge on EV71a and IgYb treatment.
| Trial no. | Mice no. | EV71 specific IgY titer | IgY IP date (dpi) | Morbidity (%) | Mortality (%) | Mortality of ill mice (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | 64 | 1–3 | 100(14/14) | 92(13/14) | 92(13/14) |
| Control | 13 | 64 | 1–3 | 100(13/13) | 77(10/13) | 77(10/13) |
| 2 | 10 | 128 | 1–3 | 20(2/10) | 10(1/10) | 50(1/2) |
| Control | 12 | 128 | 1–3 | 100(12/12) | 100(12/12) | 100(12/12) |
| 3 | 30 | 256 | 1–3 | 7(2/30) | 0(0/30) | 0(0/2) |
| Control | 26 | 256 | 1–3 | 100(26/26) | 92(24/26) | 92(24/26) |
| 4 | 21 | 512 | 1–3 | 0(0/21) | 0(0/21) | 0(0/21) |
| Control | 23 | 512 | 1–3 | 100(23/23) | 91(21/23) | 91(21/23) |
| 5 | 14 | 512 | 2–4 | 43(6/14) | 21(3/14) | 50(3/6) |
| Control | 16 | 512 | 2–4 | 94(15/16) | 88(14/16) | 93(14/15) |
| 6 | 19 | 512 | 3–5 | 89(17/19) | 63(12/19) | 71(12/17) |
| Control | 20 | 512 | 3–5 | 85(17/20) | 80(16/20) | 94(16/17) |
| Trial (Ave ± Std) | 43.1 ± 42.5 | 31 ± 37.9 | 34.2 ± 32.4 | |||
| Control (Ave ± Std) | 96.5 ± 6.1 | 88.0 ± 8.4 | 91.2 ± 7.6 | |||
IP infection dose: 105 pfu/mouse, one-day-old mouse.
IP injection dose: 100 μl/mouse/day (IgY titer between 64 and 512).
Non-immunized IgY.
Differences in proportions morbidity and mortality were tested with the use of the X2 statistic (P < 0.05).
Effects of oral challenge on EV71a and IgYb treatment.
| Trial no. | Mice no. | Age and BW | Oral IgY ad. time | Morbidity (%) | Mortality (%) | Mortality of ill mice (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-1 | 25 | 4–5 D | 1 h before | 24(6/25) | 20(5/25) | 91(5/6) |
| Control | 26 | 2.5– | 1 h before | 69(18/26) | 62(16/26) | 89(16/18) |
| 7-2 | 16 | 3.0 g | 1 h after | 38(6/16) | 31(5/16) | 83(5/6) |
| Control | 22 | 1 h after | 91(20/22) | 77(17/22) | 80(16/20) | |
| Trial (Ave ± Std) | 31.0 ± 9.9 | 25.5 ± 7.8 | 87.0 ± 5.7 | |||
| Control (Ave ± Std) | 80.0 ± 15.6 | 69.5 ± 10.6 | 84.5 ± 6.4 | |||
| 8-1 | 19 | 5–6 D | 1 h before | 10(2/19) | 5(1/19) | 50(1/2) |
| Control | 19 | 3.0– | 1 h before | 32(6/19) | 32(6/19) | 100(6/6) |
| 8-2 | 19 | 3.5 g | 1 h after | 16(3/19) | 11(2/19) | 67(2/3) |
| Control | 19 | 1 h after | 26(5/19) | 21(4/19) | 80(4/5) | |
| Trial (Ave ± Std) | 13.0 ± 4.2 | 8.0 ± 4.2 | 58.5 ± 12.0 | |||
| Control (Ave ± Std) | 29.0 ± 4.2 | 26.5 ± 7.8 | 90.0 ± 14.1 | |||
Oral inoculation dose: 3 × 106 pfu/mouse.
Orally administrated IgY dose: neutralization titer 512, 100 μl/mouse.
Differences in proportions of morbidity and mortality were tested with the use of the X2 statistic (P < 0.05).
Neutralization titers of EV71 specific IgY from different chickens.
| Chickens | Concentration of specific IgY against EV71 | Neutralization titer |
|---|---|---|
| YA1 (8W) | 9.6 | 0 |
| YA2 (17W) | 33.4 | 16 |
| YA3 (15W) | 37.8 | 0 |
| YA4 (8W) | 45.5 | 0 |
| YB1 (6W) | 40.1 | 0 |
| YB2 (8W) | 1.7 | 64 |
| YB3 (9W) | 50.2 | 512 |
| YC1 (15W) | 28.9 | 64 |
| YC2 (15W) | 19.9 | 256 |
| YC3 (8W) | 16.8 | 0 |
| YC4 (8W) | 20.7 | 16 |
| YE1 (16W) | 49.1 | 2048 |
| YE2 (11W) | 46.5 | 256 |
| YE3 (15W) | 123 | 16 |
| YE4 (7W) | 66.5 | 128 |
The concentration of WSF specific IgY against EV71 was determined using the ELISA method.
The IgY-containing WSF was further purified by ultra filtration using Amicon Ultra-15 filter (PL-100, Millipore), condensing the sample to 1/40 of its original volume. These WSF concentrates were then subjected to the virus neutralization test.