Literature DB >> 20936736

Comparative effectiveness research priorities at federal agencies: the view from the Department of Veterans Affairs, National Institute on Aging, and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Timothy J O'Leary1, Jean R Slutsky, Marie A Bernard.   

Abstract

In the last year, attention has been focused on translating federally sponsored health research into better health for Americans. Since the passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) on February 17, 2009, ARRA funds to support Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) have increased this focus. A large proportion of topical areas of interest in CER affects the older segment of the population. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), the National Institute on Aging (NIA), and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) have supported robust research portfolios focused on aging populations that meet the varying definitions of CER. This short article briefly describes the research missions of the AHRQ, NIA, and VA. The various definitions of CER as the Congressional Budget Office, the Institute of Medicine, and the ARRA-established Federal Coordinating Council have put forward, as well as important topics for which CER is particularly needed, are then reviewed. Finally, approaches in which the three agencies support CER involving the aging population are set forth and opportunities for future CER research outlined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20936736      PMCID: PMC2953735          DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02939.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  6 in total

1.  On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  A Laurie Shroyer; Frederick L Grover; Brack Hattler; Joseph F Collins; Gerald O McDonald; Elizabeth Kozora; John C Lucke; Janet H Baltz; Dimitri Novitzky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Major outcomes in moderately hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive patients randomized to pravastatin vs usual care: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT-LLT).

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease.

Authors:  William E Boden; Robert A O'Rourke; Koon K Teo; Pamela M Hartigan; David J Maron; William J Kostuk; Merril Knudtson; Marcin Dada; Paul Casperson; Crystal L Harris; Bernard R Chaitman; Leslee Shaw; Gilbert Gosselin; Shah Nawaz; Lawrence M Title; Gerald Gau; Alvin S Blaustein; David C Booth; Eric R Bates; John A Spertus; Daniel S Berman; G B John Mancini; William S Weintraub
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin.

Authors:  William C Knowler; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Sarah E Fowler; Richard F Hamman; John M Lachin; Elizabeth A Walker; David M Nathan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-02-07       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  William Duckworth; Carlos Abraira; Thomas Moritz; Domenic Reda; Nicholas Emanuele; Peter D Reaven; Franklin J Zieve; Jennifer Marks; Stephen N Davis; Rodney Hayward; Stuart R Warren; Steven Goldman; Madeline McCarren; Mary Ellen Vitek; William G Henderson; Grant D Huang
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 91.245

  6 in total
  10 in total

1.  Immune aging and challenges for immune protection of the graying population.

Authors:  Abbe N Vallejo
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 6.745

2.  What comparative effectiveness research is needed? A framework for using guidelines and systematic reviews to identify evidence gaps and research priorities.

Authors:  Tianjing Li; S Swaroop Vedula; Roberta Scherer; Kay Dickersin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Meta-analysis of quality-of-life improvement after cochlear implantation and associations with speech recognition abilities.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Michael Bauschard; Jonathan L Hatch; Emily Franko-Tobin; H Richard Droghini; Shaun A Nguyen; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Meta-analysis of Cochlear Implantation Outcomes Evaluated With General Health-related Patient-reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Michael Bauschard; Jonathan L Hatch; Emily Franko-Tobin; Harris Richard Droghini; Craig A Velozo; Shaun A Nguyen; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Timing of Birth as an Emergent Risk Factor for Rotavirus Hospitalization and Vaccine Performance in the Postvaccination Era in the United States.

Authors:  Benjamin Lopman; Rebecca Dahl; Minesh Shah; Umesh D Parashar
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 6.  Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christina L Goldstein; Kevin Macwan; Kala Sundararajan; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Underrepresentation of elderly people in randomised controlled trials. The example of trials of 4 widely prescribed drugs.

Authors:  Cécile Konrat; Isabelle Boutron; Ludovic Trinquart; Guy-Robert Auleley; Philippe Ricordeau; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Study of Methods for Assessing Research Topic Elicitation and pRioritization (SMARTER): Study Protocol to Compare Qualitative Research Methods and Advance Patient Engagement in Research.

Authors:  Danielle C Lavallee; Mary R Scott; Andrew L Avins; David R Nerenz; Todd C Edwards; Donald L Patrick; Sarah O Lawrence; Zoya Bauer; Anjali R Truitt; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Bryan Comstock
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-09-07

9.  Comparing three approaches for involving patients in research prioritization: a qualitative study of participant experiences.

Authors:  Danielle C Lavallee; Sarah O Lawrence; Andrew L Avins; David R Nerenz; Todd C Edwards; Donald L Patrick; Zoya Bauer; Anjali R Truitt; Sarah E Monsell; Mary R Scott; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2020-05-01

Review 10.  Decompression Using Minimally Invasive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated with Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Review.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Tang-Fen Liu; Hua Shan; Zhong-Yuan Wan; Zhe Wang; Omar Viswanath; Antonella Paladini; Giustino Varrassi; Hai-Qiang Wang
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2021-07-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.