OBJECTIVES: To describe the methodology in developing an antimicrobial self-assessment toolkit (ASAT). METHODS: The ASAT was developed through a National Pharmacy Reference Group using an evidence-based approach of published information and national reports to identify criteria for inclusion. These were subdivided into domains that addressed: 1) Antimicrobial management within the Trust-structures and lines of responsibility and accountability-high-level notification to the Board. 2) Operational delivery of an antimicrobial strategy-operational standards of good antimicrobial stewardship. 3) Risk assessment for antimicrobial chemotherapy. 4) Clinical governance assurance. 5) Education and training-training needs and delivery of education and training for all who issue, prescribe and administer antimicrobials. 6) Antimicrobial pharmacist-systems in place for ensuring their optimum use. 7) Patients, Carers and the Public-information needs of patients, carers and the public. RESULTS: A web-based toolkit was developed using information from national reports and guidance on antimicrobial stewardship. The toolkit offers a checklist for hospitals to self-assess their organizations' levels of antimicrobial stewardship. CONCLUSIONS: The ASAT offers a web-enabled, version-controlled instrument for the assessment of antimicrobial stewardship in acute hospitals. It may offer a sensitive instrument to assess longitudinal progress on antimicrobial stewardship in an individual institution or act as a benchmark with similar organizations. Further work is ongoing to evaluate and further refine the ASAT.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the methodology in developing an antimicrobial self-assessment toolkit (ASAT). METHODS: The ASAT was developed through a National Pharmacy Reference Group using an evidence-based approach of published information and national reports to identify criteria for inclusion. These were subdivided into domains that addressed: 1) Antimicrobial management within the Trust-structures and lines of responsibility and accountability-high-level notification to the Board. 2) Operational delivery of an antimicrobial strategy-operational standards of good antimicrobial stewardship. 3) Risk assessment for antimicrobial chemotherapy. 4) Clinical governance assurance. 5) Education and training-training needs and delivery of education and training for all who issue, prescribe and administer antimicrobials. 6) Antimicrobial pharmacist-systems in place for ensuring their optimum use. 7) Patients, Carers and the Public-information needs of patients, carers and the public. RESULTS: A web-based toolkit was developed using information from national reports and guidance on antimicrobial stewardship. The toolkit offers a checklist for hospitals to self-assess their organizations' levels of antimicrobial stewardship. CONCLUSIONS: The ASAT offers a web-enabled, version-controlled instrument for the assessment of antimicrobial stewardship in acute hospitals. It may offer a sensitive instrument to assess longitudinal progress on antimicrobial stewardship in an individual institution or act as a benchmark with similar organizations. Further work is ongoing to evaluate and further refine the ASAT.
Authors: K de With; F Allerberger; S Amann; P Apfalter; H-R Brodt; T Eckmanns; M Fellhauer; H K Geiss; O Janata; R Krause; S Lemmen; E Meyer; H Mittermayer; U Porsche; E Presterl; S Reuter; B Sinha; R Strauß; A Wechsler-Fördös; C Wenisch; W V Kern Journal: Infection Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.553
Authors: Myriam Gharbi; Luke S P Moore; Enrique Castro-Sánchez; Elpiniki Spanoudaki; Charlotte Grady; Alison H Holmes; Lydia N Drumright Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 3.090