BACKGROUND: Higher ambient fine particulate matter (PM₂.₅) levels can be associated with increased blood pressure and vascular dysfunction. OBJECTIVES: To determine the differential effects on blood pressure and vascular function of daily changes in community ambient- versus personal-level PM₂.₅ measurements. METHODS: Cardiovascular outcomes included vascular tone and function and blood pressure measured in 65 non-smoking subjects. PM₂.₅ exposure metrics included 24 h integrated personal- (by vest monitors) and community-based ambient levels measured for up to 5 consecutive days (357 observations). Associations between community- and personal-level PM₂.₅ exposures with alterations in cardiovascular outcomes were assessed by linear mixed models. RESULTS: Mean daily personal and community measures of PM₂.₅ were 21.9±24.8 and 15.4±7.5 μg/m³, respectively. Community PM₂.₅ levels were not associated with cardiovascular outcomes. However, a 10 μg/m³ increase in total personal-level PM₂.₅ exposure (TPE) was associated with systolic blood pressure elevation (+1.41 mm Hg; lag day 1, p<0.001) and trends towards vasoconstriction in subsets of individuals (0.08 mm; lag day 2 among subjects with low secondhand smoke exposure, p=0.07). TPE and secondhand smoke were associated with elevated systolic blood pressure on lag day 1. Flow-mediated dilatation was not associated with any exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to higher personal-level PM₂.₅ during routine daily activity measured with low-bias and minimally-confounded personal monitors was associated with modest increases in systolic blood pressure and trends towards arterial vasoconstriction. Comparable elevations in community PM₂.₅ levels were not related to these outcomes, suggesting that specific components within personal and background ambient PM₂.₅ may elicit differing cardiovascular responses.
BACKGROUND: Higher ambient fine particulate matter (PM₂.₅) levels can be associated with increased blood pressure and vascular dysfunction. OBJECTIVES: To determine the differential effects on blood pressure and vascular function of daily changes in community ambient- versus personal-level PM₂.₅ measurements. METHODS: Cardiovascular outcomes included vascular tone and function and blood pressure measured in 65 non-smoking subjects. PM₂.₅ exposure metrics included 24 h integrated personal- (by vest monitors) and community-based ambient levels measured for up to 5 consecutive days (357 observations). Associations between community- and personal-level PM₂.₅ exposures with alterations in cardiovascular outcomes were assessed by linear mixed models. RESULTS: Mean daily personal and community measures of PM₂.₅ were 21.9±24.8 and 15.4±7.5 μg/m³, respectively. Community PM₂.₅ levels were not associated with cardiovascular outcomes. However, a 10 μg/m³ increase in total personal-level PM₂.₅ exposure (TPE) was associated with systolic blood pressure elevation (+1.41 mm Hg; lag day 1, p<0.001) and trends towards vasoconstriction in subsets of individuals (0.08 mm; lag day 2 among subjects with low secondhand smoke exposure, p=0.07). TPE and secondhand smoke were associated with elevated systolic blood pressure on lag day 1. Flow-mediated dilatation was not associated with any exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to higher personal-level PM₂.₅ during routine daily activity measured with low-bias and minimally-confounded personal monitors was associated with modest increases in systolic blood pressure and trends towards arterial vasoconstriction. Comparable elevations in community PM₂.₅ levels were not related to these outcomes, suggesting that specific components within personal and background ambient PM₂.₅ may elicit differing cardiovascular responses.
Authors: Phoebe A Stapleton; Valerie C Minarchick; Michael McCawley; Travis L Knuckles; Timothy R Nurkiewicz Journal: Microcirculation Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 2.628
Authors: Y Zhou; Z Qian; M G Vaughn; B B Boutwell; M Yang; X-W Zeng; R-Q Liu; X-D Qin; Y Zhu; G-H Dong Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2015-10-08 Impact factor: 3.012
Authors: Wei Huang; Lu Wang; Jianping Li; Mochuan Liu; Hongbing Xu; Shengcong Liu; Jie Chen; Yi Zhang; Masako Morishita; Robert L Bard; Jack R Harkema; Sanjay Rajagopalan; Robert D Brook Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Hualiang Lin; Yanfei Guo; Yang Zheng; Qian Di; Tao Liu; Jianpeng Xiao; Xing Li; Weilin Zeng; Lenise A Cummings-Vaughn; Steven W Howard; Michael G Vaughn; Zhengmin Min Qian; Wenjun Ma; Fan Wu Journal: Hypertension Date: 2017-03-27 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Patricia F Coogan; Laura F White; Jeffrey Yu; Robert D Brook; Richard T Burnett; Julian D Marshall; Traci N Bethea; Lynn Rosenberg; Michael Jerrett Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Kyle Steenland; Ajay Pillarisetti; Miles Kirby; Jennifer Peel; Maggie Clark; Will Checkley; Howard H Chang; Thomas Clasen Journal: Environ Int Date: 2017-11-26 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Ashlinn K Quinn; Kenneth Ayuurebobi Ae-Ngibise; Darby W Jack; Ellen Abrafi Boamah; Yeetey Enuameh; Mohammed Nuhu Mujtaba; Steven N Chillrud; Blair J Wylie; Seth Owusu-Agyei; Patrick L Kinney; Kwaku Poku Asante Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Patricia F Coogan; Laura F White; Jeffrey Yu; Richard T Burnett; Edmund Seto; Robert D Brook; Julie R Palmer; Lynn Rosenberg; Michael Jerrett Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 4.822