Literature DB >> 20935093

Silent mischief: bacteriophage Mu insertions contaminate products of Escherichia coli random mutagenesis performed using suicidal transposon delivery plasmids mobilized by broad-host-range RP4 conjugative machinery.

Lionel Ferrières1, Gaëlle Hémery, Toan Nham, Anne-Marie Guérout, Didier Mazel, Christophe Beloin, Jean-Marc Ghigo.   

Abstract

Random transposon mutagenesis is the strategy of choice for associating a phenotype with its unknown genetic determinants. It is generally performed by mobilization of a conditionally replicating vector delivering transposons to recipient cells using broad-host-range RP4 conjugative machinery carried by the donor strain. In the present study, we demonstrate that bacteriophage Mu, which was deliberately introduced during the original construction of the widely used donor strains SM10 λpir and S17-1 λpir, is silently transferred to Escherichia coli recipient cells at high frequency, both by hfr and by release of Mu particles by the donor strain. Our findings suggest that bacteriophage Mu could have contaminated many random-mutagenesis experiments performed on Mu-sensitive species with these popular donor strains, leading to potential misinterpretation of the transposon mutant phenotype and therefore perturbing analysis of mutant screens. To circumvent this problem, we precisely mapped Mu insertions in SM10 λpir and S17-1 λpir and constructed a new Mu-free donor strain, MFDpir, harboring stable hfr-deficient RP4 conjugative functions and sustaining replication of Π-dependent suicide vectors. This strain can therefore be used with most of the available transposon-delivering plasmids and should enable more efficient and easy-to-analyze mutant hunts in E. coli and other Mu-sensitive RP4 host bacteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20935093      PMCID: PMC3008518          DOI: 10.1128/JB.00621-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  49 in total

Review 1.  Genetic approaches to study of biofilms.

Authors:  G A O'Toole; L A Pratt; P I Watnick; D K Newman; V B Weaver; R Kolter
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Transposome insertional mutagenesis and direct sequencing of microbial genomes.

Authors:  L M Hoffman; J J Jendrisak; R J Meis; I Y Goryshin; S W Reznikof
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  A rapid method for efficient gene replacement in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans.

Authors:  M K Chaveroche; J M Ghigo; C d'Enfert
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  RP4-based plasmids for conjugation between Escherichia coli and members of the Vibrionaceae.

Authors:  Eric V Stabb; Edward G Ruby
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  Construction of a mariner-based transposon for epitope-tagging and genomic targeting.

Authors:  Su L Chiang; Eric J Rubin
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2002-08-21       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 6.  The art and design of genetic screens: Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Howard A Shuman; Thomas J Silhavy
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 7.  Transposon-based strategies for microbial functional genomics and proteomics.

Authors:  Finbarr Hayes
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 16.830

8.  Construction of a large signature-tagged mini-Tn5 transposon library and its application to mutagenesis of Sinorhizobium meliloti.

Authors:  Nataliya Pobigaylo; Danijel Wetter; Silke Szymczak; Ulf Schiller; Stefan Kurtz; Folker Meyer; Tim W Nattkemper; Anke Becker
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  A rapid and simple method for inactivating chromosomal genes in Yersinia.

Authors:  Anne Derbise; Biliana Lesic; Denis Dacheux; Jean Marc Ghigo; Elisabeth Carniel
Journal:  FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol       Date:  2003-09-22

10.  One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products.

Authors:  K A Datsenko; B L Wanner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  117 in total

1.  Contact-dependent growth inhibition toxins exploit multiple independent cell-entry pathways.

Authors:  Julia L E Willett; Grant C Gucinski; Jackson P Fatherree; David A Low; Christopher S Hayes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A D, D-carboxypeptidase is required for Vibrio cholerae halotolerance.

Authors:  Andrea Möll; Tobias Dörr; Laura Alvarez; Brigid M Davis; Felipe Cava; Matthew K Waldor
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.491

3.  A dynamically assembled cell wall synthesis machinery buffers cell growth.

Authors:  Timothy K Lee; Carolina Tropini; Jen Hsin; Samantha M Desmarais; Tristan S Ursell; Enhao Gong; Zemer Gitai; Russell D Monds; Kerwyn Casey Huang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Genetic Determinants of Penicillin Tolerance in Vibrio cholerae.

Authors:  Anna I Weaver; Shannon G Murphy; Benjamin D Umans; Srikar Tallavajhala; Ikenna Onyekwere; Stephen Wittels; Jung-Ho Shin; Michael VanNieuwenhze; Matthew K Waldor; Tobias Dörr
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Lytic transglycosylases RlpA and MltC assist in Vibrio cholerae daughter cell separation.

Authors:  Anna I Weaver; Valeria Jiménez-Ruiz; Srikar R Tallavajhala; Brett P Ransegnola; Kimberly Q Wong; Tobias Dörr
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.501

6.  Cell separation in Vibrio cholerae is mediated by a single amidase whose action is modulated by two nonredundant activators.

Authors:  Andrea Möll; Tobias Dörr; Laura Alvarez; Michael C Chao; Brigid M Davis; Felipe Cava; Matthew K Waldor
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Characterization of New Virulence Factors Involved in the Intracellular Growth and Survival of Burkholderia pseudomallei.

Authors:  Madeleine G Moule; Natasha Spink; Sam Willcocks; Jiali Lim; José Afonso Guerra-Assunção; Felipe Cia; Olivia L Champion; Nicola J Senior; Helen S Atkins; Taane Clark; Gregory J Bancroft; Jon Cuccui; Brendan W Wren
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Defining Genetic Fitness Determinants and Creating Genomic Resources for an Oral Pathogen.

Authors:  Ajay M Narayanan; Matthew M Ramsey; Apollo Stacy; Marvin Whiteley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  A Putative Acetylation System in Vibrio cholerae Modulates Virulence in Arthropod Hosts.

Authors:  Kalle Liimatta; Emily Flaherty; Gabby Ro; Duy K Nguyen; Cecilia Prado; Alexandra E Purdy
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  A Novel Genome-Editing Platform for Drug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Reveals an AdeR-Unrelated Tigecycline Resistance Mechanism.

Authors:  Vincent Trebosc; Sarah Gartenmann; Kevin Royet; Pablo Manfredi; Marcus Tötzl; Birgit Schellhorn; Michel Pieren; Marcel Tigges; Sergio Lociuro; Peter C Sennhenn; Marc Gitzinger; Dirk Bumann; Christian Kemmer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.