Literature DB >> 20934842

Effect of patient age on morphology of anterior cruciate ligament grafts at second-look arthroscopy.

Kazutaka Kinugasa1, Tatsuo Mae, Norinao Matsumoto, Shigeto Nakagawa, Minoru Yoneda, Konsei Shino.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of patient age on the morphology of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft after ACL reconstruction, as well as to investigate the relation between morphology and clinical outcomes.
METHODS: Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction by use of autogenous semitendinosus tendon graft was performed in 193 patients. Of these, 102 patients (51 male and 51 female patients) had consented to undergo second-look arthroscopy at the time of hardware removal within 2 years of ACL reconstruction. These patients were divided into the following 3 groups according to their age: group A, 29 years or younger (55 cases); group B, 30 to 49 years (36 cases); and group C, 50 years or older (11 cases). At second-look arthroscopy, the grafts were evaluated based on synovial coverage around the grafts, tension, and damage/tear of the grafts themselves. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with a physical examination including the Lachman test and side-to-side difference by KT-2000 knee arthrometer (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA), subjective assessment including International Knee Documentation Committee subjective assessment and Lysholm score, and sports activity level including Tegner activity scale. The Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, analysis of variance, and χ² test were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Good synovial coverage over the graft was found in 49 cases (89%) in group A, 30 (83%) in group B, and 5 (46%) in group C. Synovial coverage in group C was significantly poorer than that in the other 2 groups. No statistical difference was found in tension of graft among the 3 groups, whereas the incidence of a "partial tear" tended to increase with age. With respect to clinical outcome, there was no significant difference among the 3 groups except for sports activity.
CONCLUSIONS: Although clinical outcomes were comparable among the 3 groups, synovial coverage of ACL grafts in elderly patients was significantly poorer than that in younger patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study. Copyright
© 2011 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20934842     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.05.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  11 in total

1.  Triple-bundle ACL grafts evaluated by second-look arthroscopy.

Authors:  Yoshinari Tanaka; Konsei Shino; Shuji Horibe; Norimasa Nakamura; Shigeto Nakagawa; Tatsuo Mae; Hidenori Otsubo; Tomoyuki Suzuki; Ken Nakata
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Age over 50 years is not a contraindication for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gianluca Costa; Alberto Grassi; Simone Perelli; Giuseppe Agrò; Federico Bozzi; Mirco Lo Presti; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Second-look arthroscopic findings and clinical results after polyethylene terephthalate augmented anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Johannes Struewer; Ewgeni Ziring; Bernd Ishaque; Turgay Efe; Tim Schwarting; Benjamin Buecking; Karl F Schüttler; Steffen Ruchholtz; Thomas M Frangen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Acute ACL reconstruction in patients over 40 years of age.

Authors:  Guido Wierer; Armin Runer; Christian Hoser; Elmar Herbst; Peter Gföller; Christian Fink
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Clinical and arthroscopic outcomes of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstrings augmented with ligament augmentation and reconstruction systems compared with four-strand hamstring tendon grafts alone.

Authors:  Hamood H G Zaid; Nan Chenwei; Hua Xu; Guo Yang; Xihai Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 6.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in the Older Athlete.

Authors:  Matthew J Best; Bashir A Zikria; John H Wilckens
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 3.843

7.  Chronicity of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency, Part 2: Radiographic Predictors of Early Graft Failure.

Authors:  Yoshinari Tanaka; Keisuke Kita; Rikio Takao; Hiroshi Amano; Ryohei Uchida; Yoshiki Shiozaki; Yasukazu Yonetani; Kazutaka Kinugasa; Tatsuo Mae; Shuji Horibe
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-02-16

Review 8.  A Comparison of Results after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in over 40 and under 40 Years of Age: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kun-Tae Kim; Hyun-Jung Kim; Hyang-Im Lee; Young-Jin Park; Dong-Geun Kang; Jun-Ill Yoo; Dong-Kyu Moon; Sung-Hee Cho; Sun-Chul Hwang
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-06-01

9.  The mature athlete: aging tendon and ligament.

Authors:  Moira M McCarthy; Jo A Hannafin
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.843

10.  Clinical outcomes and second-look arthroscopic findings of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft, hybrid graft, and allograft.

Authors:  Xiaozuo Zheng; Yang Hu; Peng Xie; Tong Li; Yu-E Feng; Juyuan Gu; Shijun Gao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.