PURPOSE: In the United States, early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is defined as asymptomatic stage I/II non-bulky disease. European groups stratify patients to more intense treatment by considering additional unfavorable factors, such as age, number of nodal sites, sedimentation rate, extranodal disease, and elements of the international prognostic score for advanced HL. We sought to determine the prognostic significance of these factors in patients with early-stage disease treated at Stanford University Medical Center. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study was a retrospective analysis of 101 patients treated with abbreviated Stanford V chemotherapy (8 weeks) and 30-Gy (n=84 patients) or 20-Gy (n=17 patients) radiotherapy to involved sites. Outcomes were assessed after applying European risk factors. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 8.5 years, freedom from progression (FFP) and overall survival (OS) rates were 94% and 97%, respectively. From 33% to 60% of our patients were unfavorable per European criteria (i.e., German Hodgkin Study Group [GHSG], n=55%; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, n=33%; and Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte, n=61%). Differences in FFP rates between favorable and unfavorable patients were significant only for GHSG criteria (p=0.02) with there were no differences in OS rates for any criteria. Five of 6 patients who relapsed were successfully salvaged. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of our patients deemed unfavorable had an excellent outcome despite undergoing a significantly abbreviated regimen. Application of factors used by the GHSG defined a less favorable subset for FFP but with no impact on OS. As therapy for early-stage disease moves to further reductions in therapy, these factors take on added importance in the interpretation of current trial results and design of future studies.
PURPOSE: In the United States, early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is defined as asymptomatic stage I/II non-bulky disease. European groups stratify patients to more intense treatment by considering additional unfavorable factors, such as age, number of nodal sites, sedimentation rate, extranodal disease, and elements of the international prognostic score for advanced HL. We sought to determine the prognostic significance of these factors in patients with early-stage disease treated at Stanford University Medical Center. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study was a retrospective analysis of 101 patients treated with abbreviated Stanford V chemotherapy (8 weeks) and 30-Gy (n=84 patients) or 20-Gy (n=17 patients) radiotherapy to involved sites. Outcomes were assessed after applying European risk factors. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 8.5 years, freedom from progression (FFP) and overall survival (OS) rates were 94% and 97%, respectively. From 33% to 60% of our patients were unfavorable per European criteria (i.e., German Hodgkin Study Group [GHSG], n=55%; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, n=33%; and Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte, n=61%). Differences in FFP rates between favorable and unfavorable patients were significant only for GHSG criteria (p=0.02) with there were no differences in OS rates for any criteria. Five of 6 patients who relapsed were successfully salvaged. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of our patients deemed unfavorable had an excellent outcome despite undergoing a significantly abbreviated regimen. Application of factors used by the GHSG defined a less favorable subset for FFP but with no impact on OS. As therapy for early-stage disease moves to further reductions in therapy, these factors take on added importance in the interpretation of current trial results and design of future studies.
Authors: J Raemaekers; H Kluin-Nelemans; I Teodorovic; C Meerwaldt; E Noordijk; J Thomas; M van Glabbeke; M Henry-Amar; P Carde Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Sandra J Horning; Richard T Hoppe; Sheila Breslin; Nancy L Bartlett; B William Brown; Saul A Rosenberg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: C Gisselbrecht; N Mounier; M André; O Casanovas; O Reman; C Sebban; M Divine; P Brice; J Briere; C Hennequin; C Fermé Journal: Eur J Haematol Suppl Date: 2005-07
Authors: M Tubiana; M Henry-Amar; P Carde; J M Burgers; M Hayat; E Van der Schueren; E M Noordijk; A Tanguy; J H Meerwaldt; J Thomas Journal: Blood Date: 1989-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Ralph M Meyer; Mary K Gospodarowicz; Joseph M Connors; Robert G Pearcey; Andrea Bezjak; Woodrow A Wells; Bruce F Burns; Jane N Winter; Sandra J Horning; A Rashid Dar; Marina S Djurfeldt; Keyue Ding; Lois E Shepherd Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-04-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andrea Gallamini; Martin Hutchings; Luigi Rigacci; Lena Specht; Francesco Merli; Mads Hansen; Caterina Patti; Annika Loft; Francesco Di Raimondo; Francesco D'Amore; Alberto Biggi; Umberto Vitolo; Caterina Stelitano; Rosario Sancetta; Livio Trentin; Stefano Luminari; Emilio Iannitto; Simonetta Viviani; Ivana Pierri; Alessandro Levis Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-07-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: R H Advani; R T Hoppe; D Baer; J Mason; R Warnke; J Allen; S Daadi; S A Rosenberg; S J Horning Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2012-11-07 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Ranjana H Advani; Fangxin Hong; Richard I Fisher; Nancy L Bartlett; K Sue Robinson; Randy D Gascoyne; Henry Wagner; Patrick J Stiff; Bruce D Cheson; Douglas A Stewart; Leo I Gordon; Brad S Kahl; Jonathan W Friedberg; Kristie A Blum; Thomas M Habermann; Joseph M Tuscano; Richard T Hoppe; Sandra J Horning Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-04-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Diane Tseng; Leelanand P Rachakonda; Zheng Su; Ranjana Advani; Sandra Horning; Richard T Hoppe; Andrew Quon; Edward E Graves; Billy W Loo; Phuoc T Tran Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2012-01-19 Impact factor: 3.481