BACKGROUND: Intermediate or unfavourable stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) definition relies upon at least three different scoring systems defined by cooperative groups (EORTC, GHSG and Canadian-ECOG). We aimed to investigate their efficacy and their correlation with International Prognostic Score (IPS) for advanced HL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied a population of 1156 patients with localized stage HL treated prospectively within GELA centres in H8 (518 patients) and H9 (638 patients) protocols. Median age: 30 yr, 18%, Female 50%; stage I: 25%; stage II: 75%. According to scoring systems 70% had 0-1 EORTC factors; 60% 0-1 GHSG factors and 82% 0-1 Canadian factors. The IPS for advanced stages was available only in H9 study with 64% 0-1 factor. RESULTS: Survival curves according to each of the different scoring systems could significantly discriminate the subgroup populations. When a multivariate Cox analysis was performed for overall survival (OS) including all the scoring system variables: age > 45 yr, sex male, Haemoglobin < 10.5 g/dL, lymphocytes < 600/microL, B symptoms with elevated ESR, extra nodal sites did retain an independent significant value. Probability of OS was 99%, 98%, 92%, 82% and 73% for patients with 1-5 factors, respectively P < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: These factors are similar for most of them with those described in the IPS when stages III and IV are replaced by extra nodal localization. This new score should be validated in other prospective trials, as it will simplify the Hodgkin prognostic scoring systems for localized and advanced stages.
BACKGROUND: Intermediate or unfavourable stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) definition relies upon at least three different scoring systems defined by cooperative groups (EORTC, GHSG and Canadian-ECOG). We aimed to investigate their efficacy and their correlation with International Prognostic Score (IPS) for advanced HL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied a population of 1156 patients with localized stage HL treated prospectively within GELA centres in H8 (518 patients) and H9 (638 patients) protocols. Median age: 30 yr, 18%, Female 50%; stage I: 25%; stage II: 75%. According to scoring systems 70% had 0-1 EORTC factors; 60% 0-1 GHSG factors and 82% 0-1 Canadian factors. The IPS for advanced stages was available only in H9 study with 64% 0-1 factor. RESULTS: Survival curves according to each of the different scoring systems could significantly discriminate the subgroup populations. When a multivariate Cox analysis was performed for overall survival (OS) including all the scoring system variables: age > 45 yr, sex male, Haemoglobin < 10.5 g/dL, lymphocytes < 600/microL, B symptoms with elevated ESR, extra nodal sites did retain an independent significant value. Probability of OS was 99%, 98%, 92%, 82% and 73% for patients with 1-5 factors, respectively P < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: These factors are similar for most of them with those described in the IPS when stages III and IV are replaced by extra nodal localization. This new score should be validated in other prospective trials, as it will simplify the Hodgkin prognostic scoring systems for localized and advanced stages.
Authors: Ranjana H Advani; Richard T Hoppe; Lauren S Maeda; David M Baer; Joseph Mason; Saul A Rosenberg; Sandra J Horning Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-10-08 Impact factor: 7.038