Literature DB >> 20933191

Validity of a continuous metabolic risk score as an index for modeling metabolic syndrome in adolescents.

Ike S Okosun1, Rodney Lyn, Monique Davis-Smith, Michael Eriksen, Paul Seale.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although continuous values of metabolic syndrome risk scores (cMetS) has been suggested for modeling the association between potential risk factors and metabolic syndrome (MetS) in young people, the construct validity of cMetS has not been sufficiently examined in a representative sample of youngsters. This study examined: (i) sex and race/ethnic-specific optimal cut-off points of cMetS that are associated with MetS and (ii) the construct validity of cMetS in 12- to 19-year old non-Hispanic white (NHW), non-Hispanic black (NHB), and Mexican-American (MA) subjects.
METHODS: Data (n = 1239) from the 2003 to 2004 and 2005 to 2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys were used in this study. cMetS was derived by aggregating age- and sex-standardized residuals of arterial blood pressure, triglycerides, glucose, waist circumference, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was used to determine the validity and performance of cMetS. The overall performance of the receiver operating characteristics test was quantified with area under the curve (AUC).
RESULTS: A graded relationship between cMetS and increased number of MetS factors was observed, with MetS factors of 3 or greater yielding the greatest cMetS. In male adolescents, the optimal cMetS cut-off points of cMetS that are associated with MetS in NHW, NHB, and MA were 2.01, 2.45, and 2.34, respectively. The corresponding values in female adolescents for NBW, NHB, and MA were 1.93, 2.12, and 2.23, respectively. The construct validity of cMetS for MetS was high (AUC ≥0.885; sensitivity ≥66.7; specificity ≥74.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: cMetS appears to be a suitable index for investigating the association between potential risk factors and MetS in adolescents. An understanding of the role of genetic and environmental risk factors in MetS in children may be enhanced with the use of cMetS.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20933191     DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  17 in total

1.  Working (longer than) 9 to 5: are there cardiometabolic health risks for young Australian workers who report longer than 38-h working weeks?

Authors:  Amy C Reynolds; Romola S Bucks; Jessica L Paterson; Sally A Ferguson; Trevor A Mori; Nigel McArdle; Leon Straker; Lawrence J Beilin; Peter R Eastwood
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Comparison of definitions for the metabolic syndrome in adolescents. The HELENA study.

Authors:  Tine Vanlancker; Emmily Schaubroeck; Krishna Vyncke; Cristina Cadenas-Sanchez; Christina Breidenassel; Marcela González-Gross; Frederic Gottrand; Luis A Moreno; Laurent Beghin; Denes Molnár; Yannis Manios; Marc J Gunter; Kurt Widhalm; Catherine Leclercq; Jean Dallongeville; Marcos Ascensión; Anthony Kafatos; Manuel J Castillo; Stefaan De Henauw; Francisco B Ortega; Inge Huybrechts
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Development and Validation of a Simple Risk Model for Predicting Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) in Midlife: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Musa S Ibrahim; Dong Pang; Gurch Randhawa; Yannis Pappas
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.168

4.  Clustering of cardiometabolic risk factors and the continuous cardiometabolic risk score in children from Southern Brazil: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Cézane Priscila Reuter; Jane Dagmar Pollo Renner; João Francisco de Castro Silveira; Priscila Tatiana da Silva; Rodrigo Antunes Lima; Karin Allor Pfeiffer; Lars Bo Andersen; Elza Daniel de Mello
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2021-07-06

5.  Severity of the metabolic syndrome as a predictor of type 2 diabetes between childhood and adulthood: the Princeton Lipid Research Cohort Study.

Authors:  Mark D DeBoer; Matthew J Gurka; Jessica G Woo; John A Morrison
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Genome-wide association study identifies African-ancestry specific variants for metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Fasil Tekola-Ayele; Ayo P Doumatey; Daniel Shriner; Amy R Bentley; Guanjie Chen; Jie Zhou; Olufemi Fasanmade; Thomas Johnson; Johnnie Oli; Godfrey Okafor; Benjami A Eghan; Kofi Agyenim-Boateng; Clement Adebamowo; Albert Amoah; Joseph Acheampong; Adebowale Adeyemo; Charles N Rotimi
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.797

7.  [Metabolic syndrome risk assessment in children: use of a single score].

Authors:  Julia Khéde Dourado Villa; Angélica Ribeiro E Silva; Thanise Sabrina Souza Santos; Andréia Queiroz Ribeiro; Luciana Ferreira da Rocha Sant'Ana
Journal:  Rev Paul Pediatr       Date:  2015-01-31

8.  Validity of continuous metabolic syndrome score for predicting metabolic syndrome; a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maryam Khazdouz; Motahareh Hasani; Sanaz Mehranfar; Hanieh-Sadat Ejtahed; Shirin Djalalinia; Armita Mahdavi Gorabi; Mohammad Esmaeili-Abdar; Shahrokh Karbalahi Saleh; Seyed Masoud Arzaghi; Hoda Zahedi; Amir Kasaeian; Mostafa Qorbani
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2021-04-08

9.  Is the association of continuous metabolic syndrome risk score with body mass index independent of physical activity? The CASPIAN-III study.

Authors:  Ramin Heshmat; Gita Shafiee; Roya Kelishadi; Amir Eslami Shahr Babaki; Mohammad Esmaeil Motlagh; Tahereh Arefirad; Gelayol Ardalan; Asal Ataie-Jafari; Hamid Asayesh; Rasool Mohammadi; Mostafa Qorbani
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 1.926

10.  Continuous Metabolic Syndrome Scores for Children Using Salivary Biomarkers.

Authors:  Ping Shi; J Max Goodson; Mor-Li Hartman; Hatice Hasturk; Tina Yaskell; Jorel Vargas; Maryann Cugini; Roula Barake; Osama Alsmadi; Sabiha Al-Mutawa; Jitendra Ariga; Pramod Soparkar; Jawad Behbehani; Kazem Behbehani; Francine Welty
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.