Literature DB >> 35418767

Development and Validation of a Simple Risk Model for Predicting Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) in Midlife: A Cohort Study.

Musa S Ibrahim1, Dong Pang1, Gurch Randhawa1, Yannis Pappas1.   

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and validate a simple risk model for predicting metabolic syndrome in midlife using a prospective cohort data. Design: Prospective cohort study. Participants: A total of 7626 members of the 1958 British birth cohort (individuals born in the first week of March 1958) participated in the biomedical survey at age 45 and have completed information on metabolic syndrome.
Methods: Variables utilised were obtained prospectively at birth, 7, 16, 23 and 45 years. Multivariable logistic regression was used to develop a total of ten (10) MetS risk prediction models taking the life course approach. Measures of discrimination and calibration were used to evaluate the performance of the models. A pragmatic criteria developed was used to select one model with the most potential to be useful. The internal validity (overfitting) of the selected model was assessed using bootstrap technique of Stata. Main Outcome Measure: Metabolic syndrome was defined based on the NCEP-ATP III clinical criteria.
Results: There is high prevalence of MetS among the cohort members (19.6%), with males having higher risk as compared to females (22.8% vs 16.4%, P < 0.001). Individuals with MetS are more likely to have higher levels of HbA1c and low HDL-cholesterol. Similarly, regarding the individual components of MetS, male cohort members are more likely to have higher levels of glycaemia (HbA1c), BP and serum triglycerides. In contrast, female cohort members have lower levels of HDL-cholesterol and higher levels of waist circumference. Furthermore, a total of ten (10) MetS risk prediction models were developed taking the life course approach. Of these, one model with the most potential to be applied in practical setting was selected. The model has good accuracy (AUROC 0.91 (0.90, 0.92)), is well calibrated (Hosmer-Lemeshow 6.47 (0.595)) and has good internal validity.
Conclusion: Early life factors could be included in a risk model to predict MetS in midlife. The developed model has been shown to be accurate and has good internal validity. Therefore, interventions targeting socioeconomic inequality could help in the wider prevention of MetS. However, the validity of the developed model needs to be further established in an external population.
© 2022 Ibrahim et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1958 British birth cohort; development and validation of risk model; metabolic syndrome; national child development study; prediction model; risk score

Year:  2022        PMID: 35418767      PMCID: PMC8995775          DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S336384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes        ISSN: 1178-7007            Impact factor:   3.168


  67 in total

1.  Persistence of multiple cardiovascular risk clustering related to syndrome X from childhood to young adulthood. The Bogalusa Heart Study.

Authors:  W Bao; S R Srinivasan; W A Wattigney; G S Berenson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1994-08-22

2.  The association of cardiovascular risk factor clustering related to insulin resistance syndrome (Syndrome X) between young parents and their offspring: the Bogalusa Heart Study.

Authors:  W Chen; S R Srinivasan; A Elkasabany; G S Berenson
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.162

3.  Automated variable selection methods for logistic regression produced unstable models for predicting acute myocardial infarction mortality.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Jack V Tu
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Assessing the generalizability of prognostic information.

Authors:  A C Justice; K E Covinsky; J A Berlin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  EVALUATION OF SEVERAL ANTHROPOMETRIC INDICES OF OBESITY AS PREDICTORS OF METABOLIC SYNDROME IN JORDANIAN ADULTS.

Authors:  Ahmad A Obeidat; Mousa N Ahmad; Fares H Haddad; Firas S Azzeh
Journal:  Nutr Hosp       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 1.057

6.  Prediction models for risk of developing type 2 diabetes: systematic literature search and independent external validation study.

Authors:  Ali Abbasi; Linda M Peelen; Eva Corpeleijn; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Ronald P Stolk; Annemieke M W Spijkerman; Daphne L van der A; Karel G M Moons; Gerjan Navis; Stephan J L Bakker; Joline W J Beulens
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-09-18

7.  A routine biomarker-based risk prediction model for metabolic syndrome in urban Han Chinese population.

Authors:  Wenchao Zhang; Qicai Chen; Zhongshang Yuan; Jing Liu; Zhaohui Du; Fang Tang; Hongying Jia; Fuzhong Xue; Chengqi Zhang
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 8.  Prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: systematic review.

Authors:  Johanna A A G Damen; Lotty Hooft; Ewoud Schuit; Thomas P A Debray; Gary S Collins; Ioanna Tzoulaki; Camille M Lassale; George C M Siontis; Virginia Chiocchia; Corran Roberts; Michael Maia Schlüssel; Stephen Gerry; James A Black; Pauline Heus; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Linda M Peelen; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-05-16

9.  Identifying metabolic syndrome in a clinical cohort: Implications for prevention of chronic disease.

Authors:  Allison Martin; Elizabeth P Neale; Marjka Batterham; Linda C Tapsell
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2016-09-21

Review 10.  The Global Epidemic of the Metabolic Syndrome.

Authors:  Mohammad G Saklayen
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 5.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.