BACKGROUND: The risk and success of epicardial substrate ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) support the value of techniques identifying the epicardial substrate with endocardial mapping. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that endocardial unipolar voltage mapping in patients with right ventricular (RV) VT and preserved endocardial bipolar voltage abnormalities might identify the extent of epicardial bipolar voltage abnormality. METHODS: Using a cutoff of < 5.5 mV for normal endocardial unipolar voltage derived from 8 control patients without structural heart disease, 10 patients with known ARVC/D (group 1, retrospective) and 13 patients with RV VT (group 2, prospective) with modest or no endocardial bipolar voltage abnormalities underwent detailed endocardial and epicardial mapping. RESULTS: The area of epicardial unipolar voltage abnormality in all 10 group 1 patients with ARVC/D (62 ± 21 cm²) and in 9 of the 13 group 2 patients (8 with criteria for ARVC/D) (53 ± 21 cm²) was on average three times more extensive than the endocardial bipolar abnormality and correlated (r = 0.63, P <.05 and r = 0.81, P <.008, respectively) with the larger area epicardial bipolar abnormality with respect to size (group 1: 82 ± 22 cm²; group 2: 68 ± 41 cm²) and location. In the remaining 4 group 2 patients and 3 additional reference patients without structural heart disease, endocardial bipolar, endocardial unipolar, and, as predicted, epicardial bipolar voltage all were normal. CONCLUSION: Endocardial unipolar mapping with cutoff of 5.5 mV identifies more extensive areas of epicardial bipolar signal abnormalities in patients with ARVC/D and limited endocardial VT substrate.
BACKGROUND: The risk and success of epicardial substrate ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) support the value of techniques identifying the epicardial substrate with endocardial mapping. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that endocardial unipolar voltage mapping in patients with right ventricular (RV) VT and preserved endocardial bipolar voltage abnormalities might identify the extent of epicardial bipolar voltage abnormality. METHODS: Using a cutoff of < 5.5 mV for normal endocardial unipolar voltage derived from 8 control patients without structural heart disease, 10 patients with known ARVC/D (group 1, retrospective) and 13 patients with RV VT (group 2, prospective) with modest or no endocardial bipolar voltage abnormalities underwent detailed endocardial and epicardial mapping. RESULTS: The area of epicardial unipolar voltage abnormality in all 10 group 1 patients with ARVC/D (62 ± 21 cm²) and in 9 of the 13 group 2 patients (8 with criteria for ARVC/D) (53 ± 21 cm²) was on average three times more extensive than the endocardial bipolar abnormality and correlated (r = 0.63, P <.05 and r = 0.81, P <.008, respectively) with the larger area epicardial bipolar abnormality with respect to size (group 1: 82 ± 22 cm²; group 2: 68 ± 41 cm²) and location. In the remaining 4 group 2 patients and 3 additional reference patients without structural heart disease, endocardial bipolar, endocardial unipolar, and, as predicted, epicardial bipolar voltage all were normal. CONCLUSION: Endocardial unipolar mapping with cutoff of 5.5 mV identifies more extensive areas of epicardial bipolar signal abnormalities in patients with ARVC/D and limited endocardial VT substrate.
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Takeshi Sasaki; Christopher F Miller; Rozann Hansford; Vadim Zipunnikov; Menekhem M Zviman; Joseph E Marine; David Spragg; Alan Cheng; Harikrishna Tandri; Sunil Sinha; Aravindan Kolandaivelu; Stefan L Zimmerman; David A Bluemke; Gordon F Tomaselli; Ronald D Berger; Henry R Halperin; Hugh Calkins; Saman Nazarian Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2013-11-14