Literature DB >> 20932728

High-intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer: a systematic review.

H Lukka1, T Waldron, J Chin, L Mayhew, P Warde, E Winquist, G Rodrigues, B Shayegan.   

Abstract

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has recently been promoted as a non-invasive treatment option for prostate cancer. This systematic review sought to evaluate the evidence comparing it with standard treatment in patients with localised prostate cancer. The literature review included searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, annual meetings' abstracts and websites of evidence-based practice guideline producers. Studies were included if they were randomised controlled trials comparing HIFU with current management approaches, or were meta-analyses, systematic reviews or practice guidelines addressing HIFU. No randomised controlled trials or meta-analyses were identified. Seven systematic reviews and two practice guidelines were identified; neither contained randomised controlled trials. Adjusting the selection criteria to include case series found 34 clinical studies of HIFU. Twenty-nine evaluated HIFU as the primary treatment and five examined HIFU as salvage treatment for recurrence after radiotherapy. In most studies the outcomes used to determine efficacy were negative biopsy rates or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Among the 29 studies of HIFU as the primary treatment, negative biopsy rates ranged from 35 to 95% in 21 studies, a PSA nadir of ≤0.5 ng/ml ranged from 55 to 91% in 10 studies and mean PSA nadirs ranged from 0 to 1.9 ng/ml in 17 studies. Five studies reported 5-year disease-free survival rates ranging from 55 to 95%. Among five studies of HIFU as salvage treatment, negative biopsy rates ranged from 73 to 84% in four studies, a PSA nadir of ≤0.5 ng/ml ranged from 57 to 66% in three studies and mean PSA nadirs were 1.97 and 2.38 ng/ml in two studies, respectively. Current evidence on HIFU use in prostate cancer patients is of low quality, rendering it difficult to draw conclusions about its efficacy. Until results from case series are confirmed in prospective studies, the widespread use of HIFU is not supported.
Copyright © 2010 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20932728     DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2010.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)        ISSN: 0936-6555            Impact factor:   4.126


  29 in total

1.  HIFU ablation is not a proven standard treatment for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alan I So
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Urological cancer: For localized prostate cancer, does technology equal progress?

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Ultrasound- and MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chiara Zini; Elisabeth Hipp; Stephen Thomas; Alessandro Napoli; Carlo Catalano; Aytekin Oto
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-28

4.  Phase-shift perfluorocarbon agents enhance high intensity focused ultrasound thermal delivery with reduced near-field heating.

Authors:  Linsey C Phillips; Connor Puett; Paul S Sheeran; G Wilson Miller; Terry O Matsunaga; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Case - Combined endoscopic cautery and over-the-scope-clip closure of an acquired rectourethral fistula: A novel surgical repair technique.

Authors:  Justin D Oake; Darrel E Drachenberg; David Hochman
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Conservative treatment of a recto-urethral fistula due to salvage HIFU for local recurrence of prostate cancer, 5 years after radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Luca Topazio; Claudio Perugia; Enrico Finazzi-Agro
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-11-09

7.  Cavernosal nerve functionality evaluation after magnetic resonance imaging-guided transurethral ultrasound treatment of the prostate.

Authors:  Steffen Sammet; Ari Partanen; Ambereen Yousuf; Christina L Sammet; Emily V Ward; Craig Wardrip; Marek Niekrasz; Tatjana Antic; Aria Razmaria; Keyvan Farahani; Shunmugavelu Sokka; Gregory Karczmar; Aytekin Oto
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-28

Review 8.  Re-irradiation for salvage of prostate cancer failures after primary radiotherapy.

Authors:  Stephen J Ramey; David T Marshall
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Focal therapy for prostate cancer - where are we in 2011?

Authors:  Michael S Borofsky; Timothy Ito; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-08

Review 10.  An update on focal therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marlon Perera; Nishanth Krishnananthan; Uri Lindner; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.