Janne Boone-Heinonen1, Penny Gordon-Larsen. 1. Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the largely cross-sectional literature, built environment characteristics such as walkability and recreation centres are variably related to physical activity. Subgroup-specific effects could help explain inconsistent findings, yet few studies have compared built environment associations by key characteristics such as sex or life stage. METHODS: Using data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (wave I 1994-5, wave III 2001-2; n=12 701) and a linked geographic information system, cross-sectional relationships between moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) bouts and built and socioeconomic environment measures were estimated. Negative binomial generalised estimating equation regression modelled MVPA as a function of log-transformed environment measures, controlling for individual sociodemographics and testing for interactions with sex and life stage (waves I and III, when respondents were adolescents and young adults, respectively). RESULTS: Higher landscape diversity (coefficient 0.040; 95% CI 0.019 to 0.062) and lower crime (coefficient -0.047; 95% CI -0.071 to -0.022) were related to greater weekly MVPA regardless of sex or life stage. Higher street connectivity was marginally related to lower MVPA (coefficient -0.176; 95% CI -0.357 to 0.005) in females but not males. Pay facilities and public facilities per 10 000 population and median household income were unrelated to MVPA. CONCLUSIONS: Similar relationships between higher MVPA and higher landscape diversity and lower crime rate across sex and life stage suggest that application of these environment features may benefit broad populations. Sex-specific associations for street connectivity may partly account for the variation in findings across studies and have implications for targeting physical activity promotion strategies.
BACKGROUND: In the largely cross-sectional literature, built environment characteristics such as walkability and recreation centres are variably related to physical activity. Subgroup-specific effects could help explain inconsistent findings, yet few studies have compared built environment associations by key characteristics such as sex or life stage. METHODS: Using data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (wave I 1994-5, wave III 2001-2; n=12 701) and a linked geographic information system, cross-sectional relationships between moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) bouts and built and socioeconomic environment measures were estimated. Negative binomial generalised estimating equation regression modelled MVPA as a function of log-transformed environment measures, controlling for individual sociodemographics and testing for interactions with sex and life stage (waves I and III, when respondents were adolescents and young adults, respectively). RESULTS: Higher landscape diversity (coefficient 0.040; 95% CI 0.019 to 0.062) and lower crime (coefficient -0.047; 95% CI -0.071 to -0.022) were related to greater weekly MVPA regardless of sex or life stage. Higher street connectivity was marginally related to lower MVPA (coefficient -0.176; 95% CI -0.357 to 0.005) in females but not males. Pay facilities and public facilities per 10 000 population and median household income were unrelated to MVPA. CONCLUSIONS: Similar relationships between higher MVPA and higher landscape diversity and lower crime rate across sex and life stage suggest that application of these environment features may benefit broad populations. Sex-specific associations for street connectivity may partly account for the variation in findings across studies and have implications for targeting physical activity promotion strategies.
Authors: Ethan M Berke; Thomas D Koepsell; Anne Vernez Moudon; Richard E Hoskins; Eric B Larson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-01-31 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Lilian G Perez; Terry L Conway; Adrian Bauman; Jacqueline Kerr; John P Elder; Elva M Arredondo; James F Sallis Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2017-10-20
Authors: Cheryl A Vamos; Haichun Sun; Sara B Flory; Rita DeBate; Ellen M Daley; Erika Thompson; Jennifer Bleck; Laura Merrell Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2015-07
Authors: Dariush Mozaffarian; Ashkan Afshin; Neal L Benowitz; Vera Bittner; Stephen R Daniels; Harold A Franch; David R Jacobs; William E Kraus; Penny M Kris-Etherton; Debra A Krummel; Barry M Popkin; Laurie P Whitsel; Neil A Zakai Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-08-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Roman Pabayo; Tracie A Barnett; Geetanjali D Datta; Marie Lambert; Jennifer O'Loughlin; Ichiro Kawachi Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Michael C Bazaco; Mark A Pereira; Stephen R Wisniewski; Janice C Zgibor; Thomas J Songer; Jeffrey D Burke; Anthony Fabio Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: M Graff; A S Richardson; K L Young; A L Mazul; Heather Highland; K E North; K L Mohlke; L A Lange; E M Lange; K M Harris; P Gordon-Larsen Journal: Health Place Date: 2016-10-20 Impact factor: 4.078