Literature DB >> 23160762

Associations between neighborhood characteristics and physical activity among youth within rural-urban commuting areas in the US.

Laurin Kasehagen1, Ashley Busacker, Debra Kane, Angela Rohan.   

Abstract

The association among rural-urban communities, neighborhood characteristics, and youth physical activity is inconsistent in the literature. We used data from the 2007 National Survey of Children's Health, for youth aged 10-17 years (n = 45,392), to examine the association between physical activity and neighborhood characteristics, after adjusting for known confounders. We also examined the association between physical activity and neighborhood characteristics within seven levels of Rural-Urban Commuting Areas (RUCAs) that depict a continuum from isolated rural to dense urban communities. Attainment of a minimum physical activity level differed by RUCA (P = 0.0004). In adjusted, RUCA-specific models, the presence of parks was associated with attaining a minimum physical activity level in only one of the seven RUCAs (adjusted odds ratio: 3.49; 95 % confidence interval: 1.55, 7.84). This analysis identified no association between youths' minimum physical activity attainment and neighborhood characteristics in unstratified models; and, RUCA-specific models showed little heterogeneity by rural-urban community type. Although this analysis found little association between youth physical activity and neighborhood characteristics, the findings could reflect the crude categorization of the neighborhood amenities (sidewalks, parks, recreation centers) and detracting elements (litter, dilapidated housing, vandalism) and suggests that simple measurement of the presence of an amenity or detracting element is insufficient for determining potential associations with reaching minimum levels of physical activity. By exploring neighborhood characteristics and features of neighborhood amenities within the context of well-defined community types, like RUCAs, we can better understand how and why these factors contribute to different levels of youth physical activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23160762      PMCID: PMC4301425          DOI: 10.1007/s10995-012-1188-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  42 in total

1.  The effect of perceived and structural neighborhood conditions on adolescents' physical activity and sedentary behaviors.

Authors:  Jinseok Kim; Jihong Liu; Natalie Colabianchi; Russell R Pate
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2010-10

2.  Neighborhood environment, access to places for activity, and leisure-time physical activity in a diverse North Carolina population.

Authors:  Sara L Huston; Kelly R Evenson; Philip Bors; Ziya Gizlice
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct

Review 3.  Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth.

Authors:  William B Strong; Robert M Malina; Cameron J R Blimkie; Stephen R Daniels; Rodney K Dishman; Bernard Gutin; Albert C Hergenroeder; Aviva Must; Patricia A Nixon; James M Pivarnik; Thomas Rowland; Stewart Trost; François Trudeau
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Wireless substitution: state-level estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, January-December 2007.

Authors:  Stephen J Blumberg; Julian V Luke; Gestur Davidson; Michael E Davern; Tzy-Chyi Yu; Karen Soderberg
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2009-03-11

5.  Environmental influences on physical activity levels in youth.

Authors:  Patricia Tucker; Jennifer D Irwin; Jason Gilliland; Meizi He; Kristian Larsen; Paul Hess
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 4.078

6.  Physical activity levels of high school students --- United States, 2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 17.586

7.  American Academy of Pediatrics: Children, adolescents, and television.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Neighborhood and parental supports for physical activity in minority adolescents.

Authors:  Dawn K Wilson; Hannah G Lawman; Michelle Segal; Shauntrelle Chappell
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 9.  Physical environmental correlates of childhood obesity: a systematic review.

Authors:  G F Dunton; J Kaplan; J Wolch; M Jerrett; K D Reynolds
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 9.213

10.  Participation in organised sports does not slow declines in physical activity during adolescence.

Authors:  Mathieu Bélanger; Katherine Gray-Donald; Jennifer O'Loughlin; Gilles Paradis; Jennifer Hutcheon; Katerina Maximova; James Hanley
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 6.457

View more
  5 in total

1.  Community level predictors of physical activity among women in the preconception period.

Authors:  Cheryl A Vamos; Haichun Sun; Sara B Flory; Rita DeBate; Ellen M Daley; Erika Thompson; Jennifer Bleck; Laura Merrell
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-07

2.  Expanding and enhancing federal, state, tribal, and academic partnerships to advance the field of maternal and child health.

Authors:  Charlan D Kroelinger; Wanda D Barfield; William M Callaghan
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-12

3.  Residential Neighborhood Amenities and Physical Activity Among U.S. Children with Special Health Care Needs.

Authors:  Ruopeng An; Yan Yang; Kaigang Li
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-05

Review 4.  Association between neighborhood aesthetics and childhood obesity.

Authors:  Pengfei Qu; Miyang Luo; Yang Wu; Fan Zhang; Heleen Vos; Xinqian Gu; Yang Mi; Xiaoqin Luo; Peng Jia
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 9.213

5.  Built environment and physical activity in New Zealand adolescents: a protocol for a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Erica A Hinckson; Scott Duncan; Melody Oliver; Suzanne Mavoa; Ester Cerin; Hannah Badland; Tom Stewart; Vivienne Ivory; Julia McPhee; Grant Schofield
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.