Literature DB >> 20928903

Comparison of quadriceps inactivation between nerve and muscle stimulation.

Nicolas Place1, Nicola Casartelli, Julia F Glatthorn, Nicola A Maffiuletti.   

Abstract

We evaluated the use of direct muscle stimulation for quantifying quadriceps inactivation at different contraction levels as opposed to conventional twitch interpolation using nerve stimulation. Fourteen healthy volunteers were tested. Paired stimuli were delivered to the femoral nerve or to the quadriceps muscle belly during voluntary contractions ranging from 20% to 100% of maximum, and the amplitude of the superimposed doublet was quantified to investigate inactivation. Superimposed doublet for muscle and nerve stimulation, respectively between the range of 60% to 100% of maximum (e.g., at 100%, muscle stimulation was 14 ± 5 Nm and nerve stimulation was 15 ± 6 Nm). Despite higher current doses, muscle stimulation was associated with less discomfort than nerve stimulation (P < 0.05). Collectively, our data suggest that direct muscle stimulation could be used to assess quadriceps inactivation at maximal and quasi-maximal contraction levels as a valid alternative to motor nerve stimulation.
Copyright © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20928903     DOI: 10.1002/mus.21776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  15 in total

1.  Recruitment order of quadriceps motor units: femoral nerve vs. direct quadriceps stimulation.

Authors:  Javier Rodriguez-Falces; Nicolas Place
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Atlas of the muscle motor points for the lower limb: implications for electrical stimulation procedures and electrode positioning.

Authors:  Alberto Botter; Gianmosè Oprandi; Fabio Lanfranco; Stefano Allasia; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Marco Alessandro Minetto
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Comparison of electrical nerve stimulation, electrical muscle stimulation and magnetic nerve stimulation to assess the neuromuscular function of the plantar flexor muscles.

Authors:  Daria Neyroud; John Temesi; Guillaume Y Millet; Samuel Verges; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Bengt Kayser; Nicolas Place
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation: implications of the electrically evoked sensory volley.

Authors:  A J Bergquist; J M Clair; O Lagerquist; C S Mang; Y Okuma; D F Collins
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Polymorphisms in PTK2 are associated with skeletal muscle specific force: an independent replication study.

Authors:  Georgina K Stebbings; A G Williams; C I Morse; S H Day
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Corticospinal tract integrity correlates with knee extensor weakness in chronic stroke survivors.

Authors:  Sangeetha Madhavan; Chandramouli Krishnan; Arun Jayaraman; William Z Rymer; James W Stinear
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 7.  Electrical stimulation for testing neuromuscular function: from sport to pathology.

Authors:  Guillaume Y Millet; Vincent Martin; Alain Martin; Samuel Vergès
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Short vs. long pulses for testing knee extensor neuromuscular properties: does it matter?

Authors:  Caroline Giroux; Boris Roduit; Javier Rodriguez-Falces; Jacques Duchateau; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Nicolas Place
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  The effect of muscle fatigue on stimulus intensity requirements for central and peripheral fatigue quantification.

Authors:  Daria Neyroud; Alexia Vallotton; Guillaume Y Millet; Bengt Kayser; Nicolas Place
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Quantification of Neuromuscular Fatigue: What Do We Do Wrong and Why?

Authors:  Nicolas Place; Guillaume Y Millet
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.