| Literature DB >> 20927208 |
Rajiv Khandekar1, Ton Tin K Thanh, Vu Quoc Luong.
Abstract
AIM: To compare determinants for recurrence of trichiasis at one and two years following lid surgery in Vietnam. STUDYEntities:
Keywords: Lid surgery; Space bet trichiasis and recurrence; Vietnam; recurrence; trachoma; trichiasisRecurrence
Year: 2009 PMID: 20927208 PMCID: PMC2903916 DOI: 10.4103/0974-620X.57311
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oman J Ophthalmol ISSN: 0974-620X
Figure 1Modified Cuenod Nataf lid surgery procedure for trachomatous trichiasis in Vietnam (Schematic)
Recurrence of Trachomatous Trichiasis following modifi ed Cuenod Nataf lid surgery in Vietnam
| # | % | # | % | # | % | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||||||||||
| Male | 157 | 9 | 5.7 | RR = 1.17 | 10 | 6.8 | RR = 1.2 | 19 | 12.1 | RR = 1.41 |
| Female | 479 | 47 | 9.8 | (0.86–3.41) | 35 | 8.1 | (0.61–2.36) | 82 | 17.1 | (0.89–2.25) |
| Age-group | ||||||||||
| <50 | 31 | 0 | 0.0 | X2 = 11.8 | 1 | 3.2 | X2 = 4.55 | 1 | 3.1 | X2 = 5.58 |
| 50 to 59 | 89 | 3 | 3.4 | Df = 2 | 8 | 9.3 | Df = 3 | 11 | 12.4 | Df = 3 |
| 60 to 69 | 138 | 7 | 5.1 | P = 0.03 | 15 | 11.5 | P = 0.2 | 22 | 15.9 | P = 0.2 |
| 70 & + | 376 | 46 | 12.2 | 21 | 6.4 | 67 | 17.8 | |||
| Missing | 2 | |||||||||
| Study area | ||||||||||
| Vinh Phuc | 157 | 10 | 6.4 | X2 = 6.52 | 12 | 8.2 | RR = | 22 | 15.9 | X2 = 35.2 |
| Ha Nam | 176 | 19 | 10.8 | Df = 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 2.25 | 19 | 9.1 | Df = |
| Thanh Hoa (Tho | 100 | 4 | 4.0 | P = 0.09 | 0 | 0.0 | (1.2–4.2) | 4 | 4 | P =0.1 × 1-4 |
| Xuan) | 230 | 23 | 11.3 | 33 | 18.3 | P = 0.012 | 56 | 27.6 | ||
| Thanh Hoa (Vinh Loc) | ||||||||||
| Site of TT | 30 | 71 | ||||||||
| Medial 1/3 | 393 | 41 | 10.4 | X2 = 5.71 | 12 | 8.5 | X2 = 2.97 | 16 | 18.1 | X2 = 2.26 |
| Middle 1/3 | 119 | 4 | 3.4 | Df = 2 | 2 | 10.4 | Df = 2 | 9 | 13.4 | Df = 2 |
| Lateral 1/3 | 71 | 7 | 9.9 | P = 0.06 | 1 | 3.1 | P = 0.2 | 20 | 12.7 | P = 0.32 |
| Missing | 53 | 4 | ||||||||
| Trachomatous | ||||||||||
| Scarring | 183 | 9 | 4.9 | X2 = 14.9 | 11 | 6.3 | X2 = 3.83 | 21 | 11.5 | X2 = 15.9 |
| Mild | 249 | 16 | 6.4 | Df = 2 | 15 | 6.4 | Df = 3 | 21 | 12.4 | Df = 2 |
| Moderate | 200 | 30 | 15.0 | P <0.005 | 19 | 11.2 | P = 0.15 | 49 | 24.5 | P = 0.0002 |
| Severe | 4 | 10 | ||||||||
| Missing | ||||||||||
| Lid surgery in the Past | RR = 2.08 | |||||||||
| No | 472 | 32 | 6.8 | RR = 2.2 | 28 | 6.8 | (1.2-3.2) | 60 | 12.6 | RR = 2.02 (1.4–2.87) |
| Yes | 161 | 24 | 14.9 | (1.34–2.64) | 17 | 14.2 | P = 0.02 | 41 | 25.5 | P = 0.001 |
| Missing | 3 | P = 0.001 | ||||||||
| Suture adjustment | RR = 1.45 | |||||||||
| No | 500 | 36 | 7.2 | RR = 2.2 | 32 | 6.9 | (0.72-2.9) | 26 | 24.3 | RR = 1.75(1.2-2.67) |
| Yes | 107 | 17 | 15.9 | (1.3-3.8) | 9 | 10.0 | p = 0.4 | 68 | 13.6 | P=0.008 |
| Surgeon | p = 0.0006 | |||||||||
| 1 | 89 | 8 | 9.0 | 17 | 21.0 | 25 | 30.3 | |||
| 2 | 100 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 4 | 4 | |||
| 3 | 58 | 6 | 10.3 | X2 = 9.98 | 12 | 23.1 | 18 | 31 | X2 = 42.65 | |
| 4 | 56 | 9 | 16.1 | Df = 7 | 2 | 4.3 | - | 11 | 19.6 | Df = 7 |
| 5 | 96 | 6 | 6.2 | P < 0.2 | 7 | 7.8 | 13 | 13.5 | P = 0.7 × 10 −4 | |
| 6 | 61 | 4 | 6.6 | 8 | 14.0 | 12 | 19.7 | |||
| 7 | 103 | 13 | 12.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 6 | 8.2 | |||
| 8 | 73 | 6 | 8.2 | 0 | 0.0 | 6 | 8.2 | |||
| Total | 636 | 56 | 8.8 | 6.60-11.01 | 45 | 7.8 | 4.98-9.64 | 101 | 15.9 | 13.04-18.72 |
Comparison of TT recurrence by time among variables of TT
| % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||||||||
| Male | 7.2 | 6.99 | 7.42 | 6.0 | 5.80 | 6.17 | 1.22 | |
| Female | 11.0 | 10.87 | 11.05 | 9.4 | 9.33 | 9.48 | 1.56 | 0.3 |
| Age-group | ||||||||
| <50 | 0.7 | 0.62 | 0.87 | 11.2 | 10.74 | 11.65 | -10.45 | |
| 50 to 59 | 3.8 | 3.62 | 4.03 | 14.2 | 13.83 | 14.58 | -10.38 | 0.1 |
| 60 to 69 | 8.5 | 8.34 | 8.65 | 12.1 | 11.89 | 12.26 | -3.58 | 6.9 |
| 70 & + | 16.2 | 15.97 | 16.42 | 18.6 | 18.35 | 18.82 | -2.39 | 8.1 |
| Study area | ||||||||
| Vinh Phuc | 5.5 | 5.33 | 5.66 | 11.3 | 11.10 | 11.56 | -5.83 | |
| Ha Nam | 9.0 | 8.83 | 9.22 | 0.0 | 9.03 | 14.9 | ||
| Thanh Hoa (Tho Xuan) | 3.6 | 3.25 | 3.90 | 0.0 | 3.57 | 9.4 | ||
| Thanh Hoa (Vinh Loc) | 14.1 | 13.89 | 14.32 | 17.8 | 17.54 | 18.02 | -3.67 | 2.2 |
| Trachomatous Scarring | ||||||||
| Mild | 2.8 | 2.60 | 2.96 | 9.9 | 9.64 | 10.11 | -7.10 | |
| Moderate | 4.9 | 4.80 | 4.96 | 6.6 | 6.45 | 6.70 | -1.70 | 5.4 |
| Severe | 22.5 | 22.21 | 22.83 | 9.4 | 9.27 | 9.61 | 13.08 | 20.2 |
| Past history of lid | ||||||||
| surgery | ||||||||
| No | 6.6 | 6.58 | 6.72 | 7.3 | 7.19 | 7.33 | -0.61 | |
| Yes | 15.7 | 15.41 | 15.94 | 12.3 | 12.10 | 12.57 | 3.34 | 3.9 |
| Site of TT before surgery | ||||||||
| Medial 1/3 | 10.9 | 10.77 | 10.97 | 9.7 | 9.63 | 9.82 | 1.15 | 8.0 |
| Middle 1/3 | 3.7 | 3.49 | 3.88 | 10.6 | 10.23 | 10.88 | -6.87 | |
| Lateral 1/3 | 10.5 | 10.00 | 11.05 | 4.0 | 3.66 | 4.34 | 6.53 | 13.4 |
| Surgeon | ||||||||
| 1 | 7.6 | 7.24 | 8.03 | 25.6 | 24.97 | 26.27 | -17.99 | |
| 2 | 3.6 | 3.30 | 3.97 | 0.0 | 3.64 | 21.6 | ||
| 3 | 11.7 | 11.03 | 12.37 | 26.5 | 25.59 | 27.43 | -14.80 | 3.2 |
| 4 | 20.0 | 19.13 | 20.87 | 1.4 | 1.13 | 1.64 | 18.61 | 36.6 |
| 5 | 6.4 | 6.10 | 6.72 | 7.5 | 7.20 | 7.87 | -1.12 | 16.9 |
| 6 | 7.8 | 7.37 | 8.28 | 13.2 | 12.63 | 13.78 | -5.38 | 12.6 |
| 7 | 10.1 | 9.73 | 10.39 | 0.0 | 10.06 | 28.0 | ||
| 8 | 6.8 | 6.41 | 7.26 | 0.0 | 6.84 | 24.8 | ||
| Suture adjustment | ||||||||
| No | 7.0 | 6.89 | 7.02 | 8.1 | 7.99 | 8.13 | -1.11 | |
| Yes | 16.8 | 16.46 | 17.23 | 9.4 | 9.13 | 9.73 | 7.41 | 8.5 |
| Total | 8.87 | 8.81 | 8.93 | 8.74 | 8.68 | 8.79 | 0.13 | |
We weighted the recurrence based on the one eye and two eyes of the same person was operated to manage trachomatous trichiasis.
While calculating the percentage of recurrence in 1 to 2 years we subtracted eyes that had recurrence in 1st year from the denominator.
Predictors of recurrence in eyes at 1 year 8 2 years following modifi ed Cuneod Nataf surgery
| Gender | Male | 1.003 | 1.99 | 0.99 | 0.33 | 0.11 | 0.99 | 0.05 | |
| Female | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Age | 0.98 | 0.96 | 1.01 | 0.21 | 1.09 | 1.04 | 1.14 | 0.0002 | |
| Past history of lid | No | 0.72 | 0.38 | 1.38 | 0.33 | 0.71 | 0.35 | 1.47 | 0.36 |
| surgery | Yes | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Trachomatous Scarring | Mild | 0.63 | 0.31 | 1.27 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.31 | 1.27 | 0.63 |
| Moderate | 0.39 | 0.19 | 0.81 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.19 | 0.81 | 0.39 | |
| Severe | 1.00 | 1 | |||||||
| Sutures adjusted after surgery | Yes | 0.78 | 0.38 | 1.58 | 0.49 | 0.28 | 0.13 | 0.60 | 0.001 |
| No | 1 | ||||||||
| Study site | Vinh Phuc | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.99 | 0.05 | 0.53 | 0.21 | 1.34 | 0.18 |
| Ha Nam | 0.00 | 0.99 | 0.62 | 0.29 | 1.34 | 0.22 | |||
| Thanh Hoa (Tho Xuan) | 0.15 | 0.005 | 0.19 | 0.02 | 1.64 | 0.13 | |||
| Thanh Hoa (Vinh Loc) | 1 | 0.04 | 0.56 | 1 | |||||
| Surgery in one eye | |||||||||
| Surgery in both eyes | 0.74 | 0.39 | 1.40 | 0.35 | 0.89 | 0.42 | 1.91 | 0.77 | |
| eyes | 1 | ||||||||
Adjusted odd's ratio is calculated after weighing for one and both eyes of same person operated and using denominator as eyes not having recurrence in the 1st year. We used binominal regression analysis.