Literature DB >> 20926311

Optimal screw placement for base plate fixation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

James Guido DiStefano1, Andrew Y Park, Thuc-Quyen D Nguyen, Gerd Diederichs, Jenni M Buckley, William H Montgomery.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Scapular cortical thickness has not been fully characterized from the perspective of determining optimal screw placement for securing the glenoid base plate in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve fresh frozen cadaveric scapulae underwent high resolution CT scans with 3-dimensional reconstructions and wall thickness analysis. Digital base plates were positioned and virtual screws were placed according to 2 scenarios: A - intraosseous through the entire course and exits a "safe region" with no known neurovascular structures; B - may leave and re-enter the bone and penetrates the thickest cortical region accessible regardless of adjacent structures.
RESULTS: For scenario A, the optimal screw configurations were: (superior screw) length = 35 mm, 9° superior, 2° posterior; (inferior screw-A) length = 34 mm, 16° inferior, 5° anterior; (inferior screw-B) length = 31 mm, 31 inferior, 4 posterior; (posterior screw) length 19 mm, 29° inferior, 3° anterior. For scenario B: (superior screw) length = 36 mm, 28° superior, 10° anterior; (inferior screw) length = 35 mm, 19° inferior, 4° anterior; (posterior screw) length 37 mm, 23° superior, 3° anterior. The anterior screw was consistent between scenarios A and B, averaged 29 mm in length and was directed 16° inferior and 14° posterior.
CONCLUSION: Thicker cortical regions were present in the lateral aspect of the suprascapular notch, scapular spine base, anterior/superior aspect of inferior pillar and junction of glenoid neck and scapular spine. Regions with high cortical thickness were accessible for both scenarios except for the posterior screw in scenario A.
Copyright © 2011 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20926311     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  15 in total

1.  Acromial and scapular spine fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ian P Mayne; Simon N Bell; Warwick Wright; Jennifer A Coghlan
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-01-25

2.  Glenoid morphology and the safe zone for protecting the suprascapular nerve during baseplate fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yuhui Yang; Jianlin Zuo; Tong Liu; Pu Shao; Haihe Wu; Zhongli Gao; Jianlin Xiao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Thinking outside the glenohumeral box: Hierarchical shape variation of the periarticular anatomy of the scapula using statistical shape modeling.

Authors:  Matthijs Jacxsens; Shireen Y Elhabian; Sarah E Brady; Peter N Chalmers; Andreas M Mueller; Robert Z Tashjian; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 4.  Acromial fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Simon C Lau; Richard Large
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-10-04

5.  Glenoid morphology in light of anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a dissection- and 3D-CT-based study in male and female body donors.

Authors:  Sandra Mathews; Marco Burkhard; Nabil Serrano; Karl Link; Martin Häusler; Nakita Frater; Ingeborg Franke; Helena Bischofberger; Florian M Buck; Dominic Gascho; Michael Thali; Steffen Serowy; Magdalena Müller-Gerbl; Gareth Harper; Ford Qureshi; Thomas Böni; Hans-Rudolf Bloch; Oliver Ullrich; Frank-Jakobus Rühli; Elisabeth Eppler
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Influence of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty baseplate design on torque and compression relationship.

Authors:  Miguel A Diaz; Jason E Hsu; Eric T Ricchetti; Grant E Garrigues; Sergio Gutierrez; Mark A Frankle
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-04-28

7.  Effect of baseplate size on primary glenoid stability and impingement-free range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Soo-Won Chae; Soung-Yon Kim; Haea Lee; Joung-Ro Yon; Juneyoung Lee; Seung-Ho Han
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  CT scan evaluation of glenoid bone and pectoralis major tendon: interest in shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  Laurent Obert; Christelle Peyron; Etienne Boyer; Gauthier Menu; François Loisel; Sébastien Aubry
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2016-10-07

9.  Trabecular bone density distribution in the scapula relevant to reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matt A Daalder; Gabriel Venne; Varun Sharma; Michael Rainbow; Timothy Bryant; Ryan T Bicknell
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2018-08-01

10.  Classification and Morphological Parameters of the Scapular Spine: Implications for Surgery.

Authors:  Hua-Jun Wang; Hugo Giambini; Da-Biao Hou; Song-Wei Huan; Ning Liu; Jie Yang; Chao Chen; Yan-Ping Gao; Ru-Guo Shang; Yi-Kai Li; Zhen-Gang Zha
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.