Literature DB >> 20926099

Connecting instances to promote children's relational reasoning.

Ji Y Son1, Linda B Smith, Robert L Goldstone.   

Abstract

The practice of learning from multiple instances seems to allow children to learn about relational structure. The experiments reported here focused on two issues regarding relational learning from multiple instances: (a) what kind of perceptual situations foster such learning and (b) how particular object properties, such as complexity and similarity, interact with relational learning. Two kinds of perceptual situations were of interest here: simultaneous view, where instances are viewed at once, and sequential view, where instances are viewed one at a time (one right after the other). We examined the influence of particular perceptual situations and object properties using two tests of relational reasoning: a common match-to-sample task, where new instances are compared with a common sample, and a variable match-to-sample task, where new instances are compared with a sample that varies on each trial. Experiments 1 and 2 indicate that simultaneous presentation of even highly dissimilar instances, one simple and one complex, effectively connects them together and improves relational generalization in both match-to-sample tasks. Experiment 3 shows that simple samples are more effective than complex ones in the common match-to-sample task. However, when one instance is not used a common sample and various pairs of instances are simply compared, as in Experiment 4, simple and rich instances are equally effective at promoting relational learning. These results bear on our understanding of how children connect instances and how those initial connections affect learning and generalization.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20926099      PMCID: PMC2991522          DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  21 in total

1.  Dual representation and young children's use of scale models.

Authors:  J S DeLoache
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr

2.  Why children learn color and size words so differently: evidence from adults' learning of artificial terms.

Authors:  C M Sandhofer; L B Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-12

3.  Relational similarity and the nonindependence of features in similarity judgments.

Authors:  R L Goldstone; D L Medin; D Gentner
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Mathematical problem solving by analogy.

Authors:  L R Novick; K J Holyoak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Learning theory. The advantage of abstract examples in learning math.

Authors:  Jennifer A Kaminski; Vladimir M Sloutsky; Andrew F Heckler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  When actions speak louder than words: improving children's flexibility in a card-sorting task.

Authors:  Jennifer J Brace; J Bruce Morton; Yuko Munakata
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-08

7.  Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer.

Authors:  K J Holyoak; K Koh
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-07

8.  Words as invitations to form categories: evidence from 12- to 13-month-old infants.

Authors:  S R Waxman; D B Markow
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Cognitive control of sequential knowledge in 2-year-olds: evidence from an incidental sequence-learning and -generation task.

Authors:  Andrew J Bremner; Denis Mareschal; Arnaud Destrebecqz; Axel Cleeremans
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-03

10.  The Importance of Being Interpreted: Grounded Words and Children's Relational Reasoning.

Authors:  Ji Y Son; Linda B Smith; Robert L Goldstone; Michelle Leslie
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-03-07
View more
  10 in total

1.  Novel names extend for how long preschool children sample visual information.

Authors:  Paulo F Carvalho; Catarina Vales; Caitlin M Fausey; Linda B Smith
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-12-26

2.  Selective attention, diffused attention, and the development of categorization.

Authors:  Wei Sophia Deng; Vladimir M Sloutsky
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Cross-cultural differences in cognitive development: attention to relations and objects.

Authors:  Megumi Kuwabara; Linda B Smith
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2012-06-05

4.  Parts and Relations in Young Children's Shape-Based Object Recognition.

Authors:  Elaine Augustine; Linda B Smith; Susan S Jones
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2011-10

5.  Costs of Selective Attention: When Children Notice What Adults Miss.

Authors:  Daniel J Plebanek; Vladimir M Sloutsky
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-04-07

6.  Selective attention, filtering, and the development of working memory.

Authors:  Daniel J Plebanek; Vladimir M Sloutsky
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2018-09-24

7.  The Importance of Being Interpreted: Grounded Words and Children's Relational Reasoning.

Authors:  Ji Y Son; Linda B Smith; Robert L Goldstone; Michelle Leslie
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-03-07

8.  The Role of Representations in Executive Function: Investigating a Developmental Link between Flexibility and Abstraction.

Authors:  Maria Kharitonova; Yuko Munakata
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-30

9.  Planning following stroke: a relational complexity approach using the tower of london.

Authors:  Glenda Andrews; Graeme S Halford; Mark Chappell; Annick Maujean; David H K Shum
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Comparison versus reminding.

Authors:  Jonathan G Tullis; Robert L Goldstone
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2016-12-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.