Literature DB >> 20925446

Exploring the aneugenic and clastogenic potential in the nanosize range: A549 human lung carcinoma cells and amorphous monodisperse silica nanoparticles as models.

Laetitia Gonzalez1, Leen C J Thomassen, Gina Plas, Virginie Rabolli, Dorota Napierska, Ilse Decordier, Mathieu Roelants, Peter H Hoet, Christine E A Kirschhock, Johan A Martens, Dominique Lison, Micheline Kirsch-Volders.   

Abstract

We explored how to assess the genotoxic potential of nanosize particles with a well validated assay, the in vitro cytochalasin-B micronucleus assay, detecting both clastogens and aneugens. Monodisperse Stöber amorphous silica nanoparticles (SNPs) of three different sizes (16, 60 and 104 nm) and A549 lung carcinoma cells were selected as models. Cellular uptake of silica was monitored by ICP-MS. At non-cytotoxic doses the smallest particles showed a slightly higher fold induction of micronuclei (MNBN). When considering the three SNPs together, particle number and total surface area appeared to account for MNBN induction as they both correlated significantly with the amplitude of the effect. Using nominal or cellular dose did not show statistically significant differences. Likewise, alkaline comet assay and FISH-centromeric probing of MNBN indicated a weak and not statistically significant induction of oxidative DNA damage, chromosome breakage and chromosome loss. This line of investigation will contribute to adequately design and interpret nanogenotoxicity assays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20925446     DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2010.501913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanotoxicology        ISSN: 1743-5390            Impact factor:   5.913


  13 in total

1.  Inorganic nanovectors for nucleic acid delivery.

Authors:  Sandhya Pranatharthiharan; Mitesh D Patel; Anisha A D'Souza; Padma V Devarajan
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.617

2.  Biological effects of inhaled hydraulic fracturing sand dust. III. Cytotoxicity and pro-inflammatory responses in cultured murine macrophage cells.

Authors:  Nicole S Olgun; Anna M Morris; Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Lauren N Bowers; Alycia K Knepp; Matthew G Duling; Robert R Mercer; Michael L Kashon; Jeffrey S Fedan; Stephen S Leonard
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 3.  The nanosilica hazard: another variable entity.

Authors:  Dorota Napierska; Leen C J Thomassen; Dominique Lison; Johan A Martens; Peter H Hoet
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 9.400

Review 4.  Current investigations into the genotoxicity of zinc oxide and silica nanoparticles in mammalian models in vitro and in vivo: carcinogenic/genotoxic potential, relevant mechanisms and biomarkers, artifacts, and limitations.

Authors:  Jee Young Kwon; Preeyaporn Koedrith; Young Rok Seo
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-12-15

5.  Genotoxic effects of synthetic amorphous silica nanoparticles in the mouse lymphoma assay.

Authors:  Eşref Demir; Vincent Castranova
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2016-10-20

6.  The Comet Assay as a Tool to Detect the Genotoxic Potential of Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Alba García-Rodríguez; Laura Rubio; Laura Vila; Noel Xamena; Antonia Velázquez; Ricard Marcos; Alba Hernández
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 7.  Oxidative DNA damage from nanoparticle exposure and its application to workers' health: a literature review.

Authors:  Kyung-Taek Rim; Se-Wook Song; Hyeon-Yeong Kim
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2013-08-20

8.  Genetic toxicity assessment of engineered nanoparticles using a 3D in vitro skin model (EpiDerm™).

Authors:  John W Wills; Nicole Hondow; Adam D Thomas; Katherine E Chapman; David Fish; Thierry G Maffeis; Mark W Penny; Richard A Brown; Gareth J S Jenkins; Andy P Brown; Paul A White; Shareen H Doak
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 9.400

Review 9.  The safety of nanostructured synthetic amorphous silica (SAS) as a food additive (E 551).

Authors:  Claudia Fruijtier-Pölloth
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 5.153

10.  The Size-dependent Cytotoxicity of Amorphous Silica Nanoparticles: A Systematic Review of in vitro Studies.

Authors:  Xuemeng Dong; Zehao Wu; Xiuping Li; Liyan Xiao; Man Yang; Yang Li; Junchao Duan; Zhiwei Sun
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-11-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.